Americans making excuses for Fury

[BangEM]

Apart from the British idiots on YouTube who don't want to look ****** after declaring Fury as the best thing since slice bread, BTSports and a handful of boxers that suck Fury off - most Brits aren't making excuses for Fury. This isn't the first time he got beat up pretty bad. We grew up seeing McDermott beat him up really bad. Cunningham and Pajkic putting him on his arse. Stinking up the whole place with Kevin Johnson. And going life and death with Chisora in their first fight. So it was expected albeit the only thing that's shocking is that he's yet to have a L on his record. Then again, this is the second time he has been saved by the ref.

However, with the yanks, they just can't accept the fact that the guy who made their idol, Wilder, look like a bum just got his eye splattered everywhere by a Uber driver, lol. It's obviously going to make Wilder look like the TRUE BUM that he's and they have to keep propping up Fury to make Wilder look good, lool. I guess that's why all the excuses are coming from fat yanks.

[Longhaul]

You sound like a female emotion based cuck.

[BangEM]

You sound like a female emotion based cuck.

Says a receiver that loves getting fu..cked with no Vaseline, lol.

[Marchegiano]

Remember when molina and duhaupas were "better than we knew" and "underrated" ? Them jokers is nowhere to be found now right?

That's all this is. Otto made a bunch of people look silly and rather than bringing down Fury they'll elevate Wallin.

For Wilder, honestly, the fans who defend his boxing skill set are just confused or overly defensive. You're not winning a Wilder fight if you're winning on points. You're just winning on points. The only way to beat Wilder, or even draw him, is to cut off his ability to guile a good one. Oh yeah, Artur too, wwaaaaayyy better than we expected right? No, bum city. Just because he got success on points doesn't mean he had success in shutting down Wilder's modus operandi.

Same thing here, when was Otto winning on points? Maybe early? Like how Mayweather gives away early rounds maybe? Then he got smoked like a joker. Landing one good one on Tyson does not make you anything more than a bum. Tyson's hit himself even. Taking Tyson out, or, beating Tyson on points, that's impressive.


So, yeah, I reckon in both cases what the man is good at gets a little exaggerated and we pretend it'll cover their ass for what they're bad at. No one says Wilder's a great points fighter, but his haters do point out how he's bad at it and when his fans defend they go too far in their claims. Tyson is bad puncher, but since he's so good at angles and depth we pretend like his boxing will carry in a puncher's situation. It doesn't. Twice now it doesn't.

Neither man has picked up a loss but it's pretty clear how they would if they did. You already knew before Wilder ever fought Szplika he could be outboxed, Tyson proved it. You already knew before Tyson got cut by Wallin he could be outpunched, and Wilder proved that.


Wallin's still a bum, Tyson's still the best of one of them, nothing's really changed except people laid in too deep and feel a little sheepish because the picture they paint is always one-sided and then the fights have struggle and excitement and they feel a need to explain that.

Wallin's better than we thought though. Give Artur credit, he was ahead...yada bul****. Bull**** to save face. Tyson's still the mack daddy of movement in the division and Wilder's still the most dangerous puncher in the division. The bums proved nothing. These two need to fight until one gets their damn W.

[KillaMane26]

I can almost predict every thread you make lmao.

[removed]

Wallin won 3 rounds at best.

AJ got knocked out by a fat Mexican.

/thread

[Floyd is TBE]

Nope. I've always maintained Fury's performance against Wilder has been vastly overrated by delusional Brits. Fury outweighed Wilder by 40 pounds but still nearly got stopped and knocked on his ass twice. Y'all trying this ******ed triangle theory **** while ignoring that Fury did not look good against Wilder.

[BangEM]

Nope. I've always maintained Fury's performance against Wilder has been vastly overrated by delusional Brits. Fury outweighed Wilder by 40 pounds but still nearly got stopped and knocked on his ass twice. Y'all trying this ******ed triangle theory **** while ignoring that Fury did not look good against Wilder.

Great post.

Fury didn't look good against Wilder but because Wilder was just telegraphing his Windmill and Fury had enough awareness to make him miss like Spizkla - everyone turned him into Ali. It's just similar to how some people have crowned Wilder the GOAT due to knocking out a guy like Breazeale who blocks punches with his face.

Anyway, Fury just showed everything I've been saying in one fight. Once you have a good left hook and you know how to go the body, you'll beat him. That's basically why I said Dillian Whyte beats Fury (ditto AJ). And what's Dillian Whyte great at? - left hook and body shot.

[BangEM]

Remember when molina and duhaupas were "better than we knew" and "underrated" ? Them jokers is nowhere to be found now right?

That's all this is. Otto made a bunch of people look silly and rather than bringing down Fury they'll elevate Wallin.

For Wilder, honestly, the fans who defend his boxing skill set are just confused or overly defensive. You're not winning a Wilder fight if you're winning on points. You're just winning on points. The only way to beat Wilder, or even draw him, is to cut off his ability to guile a good one. Oh yeah, Artur too, wwaaaaayyy better than we expected right? No, bum city. Just because he got success on points doesn't mean he had success in shutting down Wilder's modus operandi.

Same thing here, when was Otto winning on points? Maybe early? Like how Mayweather gives away early rounds maybe? Then he got smoked like a joker. Landing one good one on Tyson does not make you anything more than a bum. Tyson's hit himself even. Taking Tyson out, or, beating Tyson on points, that's impressive.


So, yeah, I reckon in both cases what the man is good at gets a little exaggerated and we pretend it'll cover their ass for what they're bad at. No one says Wilder's a great points fighter, but his haters do point out how he's bad at it and when his fans defend they go too far in their claims. Tyson is bad puncher, but since he's so good at angles and depth we pretend like his boxing will carry in a puncher's situation. It doesn't. Twice now it doesn't.

Neither man has picked up a loss but it's pretty clear how they would if they did. You already knew before Wilder ever fought Szplika he could be outboxed, Tyson proved it. You already knew before Tyson got cut by Wallin he could be outpunched, and Wilder proved that.


Wallin's still a bum, Tyson's still the best of one of them, nothing's really changed except people laid in too deep and feel a little sheepish because the picture they paint is always one-sided and then the fights have struggle and excitement and they feel a need to explain that.

Wallin's better than we thought though. Give Artur credit, he was ahead...yada bul****. Bull**** to save face. Tyson's still the mack daddy of movement in the division and Wilder's still the most dangerous puncher in the division. The bums proved nothing. These two need to fight until one gets their damn W.

LMAO at Molina and Duhuapas being good. Wilder has also started bragging about boxing not being themselves after fighting him, lol. What else does he want bums to turn into after fighting him? He'd have to fight a decent boxer first before running his mouth.

Fury has never been a good boxer. He just knows how to use his height/reach and run for 12rds with that awkward erky jerky style. He has always struggled with boxers that can throw hooks and fight on the inside, hence he has been well matched throughout his career.

Wallin is going to get knocked out in his next fight if he goes anywhere near any of the boxers in the top-10. He needs to keep fighting uber drivers on his level. Or he can fight Hughie Fury.

[Phenom]

You just repeating yourself now mate ...