Should be a DQ. But Edwards was getting beat up and on his way out. The late punch was a gift from the gods for Edwards. Best thing that coulda happened to him In the fight.
Comments Thread For: WBC's Sulaiman Did Not Make Edwards Decision Alone
Collapse
-
-
Hearn had nothing to do with the decision. This piece quite clearly points that out. And if cheating like Martinez did is against the rules, why the f3ck would Eddie need to pay anything?
Now go away you village idiot.Comment
-
So you think the clear foul by Martinez should have stood? He's lucky he wasn't DQ'd. That's what should have happened. But it isn't surprising to see you with this opinion because your a biased nationalist. Had it been done to a Mexican though, you would scream in the other direction. Therefore, you're pathetic.
Hearn had nothing to do with the decision. This piece quite clearly points that out. And if cheating like Martinez did is against the rules, why the f3ck would Eddie need to pay anything?
Now go away you village idiot.
As for the incident only a true fckin imbecile would say such ****** things when Hearn jumped into the ring & demanded his fighter get to keep his paper title,& then the wbc/& bboc that are on Hearns payroll does the most unprecedented rule breaking in its history to facilitate it after your British eurobum was put on ***** street where he belongs.
Only a truly deluded dumb gimp like you would spew such novice ******ity that demonstrates you don't even understand the rules of boxing,since the referee did not rule it an infraction it means the mexican was supposed to be the at least temp winner by TKO, which means only an official meeting at wbc headquarters should overturn the result,but your so deluded in your man love for jizzrag eddie that you talk outta your ass & make a buffoon outta yourself daily.:
Ps im american you fckin *****,& you sure had nothing to say when ggg did far worse to lemule after he was with his face hanging down & kd on the mat, your ****** ass would defend any euro hypejob to the ends of the earth,then have the audacity to contradict it when your pimp hearns involvedLast edited by kushking; 09-06-2019, 08:21 AM.Comment
-
Once again you act like a nationalistic twat,then call me one & surely won't respond after you run away like a coward after I own your sorry ass. Or you'll respond with more racist nationalistic diatribe like the tribalistic twat you are.
As for the incident only a true fckin imbecile would say such ****** things when Hearn jumped into the ring & demanded his fighter get to keep his paper title,& then the wbc/& bboc that are on Hearns payroll does the most unprecedented rule breaking in its history to facilitate it after your British eurobum was put on ***** street where he belongs.
Only a truly deluded dumb gimp like you would spew such novice ******ity that demonstrates you don't even understand the rules of boxing,since the referee did not rule it an infraction it means the mexican was supposed to be the at least temp winner by TKO, which means only an official meeting at wbc headquarters should overturn the result,but your so deluded in your man love for jizzrag eddie that you talk outta your ass & make a buffoon outta yourself daily.
Ps im american you fckin *****,& you sure had nothing to say when ggg did far worse to lemule after he was with his face hanging down & kd on the mat, your ****** ass would defend any euro hypejob to the ends of the earth,then have the audacity to contradict it when your pimp hearns involved
You're now repeating back to me what I said to you a few weeks ago in not running away and refusing to reply? Well, they do say imitation is the sincerest form of flattery don't they...
I'll ask the question again that you ran from...
Is David Benevidez a drug cheat. Yes or no?
Hearn actually did nothing when he stepped into the ring. It was the crowd that started booing when they thought the cheat was going to be able to walk away with a stolen belt. But Sulimain saw the illegal shot in real time so set about making it a no contest. The WBC replay was set up to make sure the cheat didn't prosper. Hearn didn't need to do anything. But you think following the rules as it was set up is the biggest rule break in history? You're really f3cked up in the head aren't you? You just project after getting called out for being a clearly biased nationalist that refuses reality to benefit another one of your Mexican cheats. Seriously, you're damaged in the head, man. That WBC rule has been around for years. It's the rules. Hitting someone with a big shot when you know they were down is cheating. The fact you support it and actually claim Martinez was the one cheated shows what an absolute scum bag loony you are.
You're questioning if I now what the rules are? You don't know what irony is do you? You're too ****** for words. You're only fit to be laughed at and mocked as the village idiot you clearly are.
Gennady did hit Lemieux when he was down. But not with a shot anywhere near to the one Martinez wound up. Gennady did so by accident after a combination. whereas Martinez moved to the side when he knew Edwards was down, would up a big shot, then drilled him. That's a big difference. Watch the two of the situations side by side to see the difference. Gennady didn't even hit Lemieux with a big shot. Martinez very much would his punch up as much as he could with intent.
Euro hype job? You mean the "Euro hype job" that beat Canelo the drug cheat twice only to be ripped off twice? The "Euro hype job" that made your cheat bend his knee like a punk and hand over his title because he thought Gennady had too much juice left so wanted to age him out a bit more? This after lying about wanting to fight him by calling his name after one of his fights and calling him to the ring and acting like a fake tough guy? Yeah, Gennady sure made b1tches out of you hoes didn't he. Haha. Everyone knows who won those fights. Everyone knows who the corrupt punk is. Everyone knows who has rehydration clauses on his opponents to weaken them to give him an even bigger advantage. Everyone knows that joke is Canelo. Your corrupt, punk, hero. How very sad.Comment
-
I'm a nationalist for wanting the rules to be upheld, but you're not for wanting cheating to be allowed? Do you even read the nonsense you come out with? Even the American haters agree he should have been DQ'd. Look at the comments you village idiot.
You're now repeating back to me what I said to you a few weeks ago in not running away and refusing to reply? Well, they do say imitation is the sincerest form of flattery don't they...
I'll ask the question again that you ran from...
Is David Benevidez a drug cheat. Yes or no?
Hearn actually did nothing when he stepped into the ring. It was the crowd that started booing when they thought the cheat was going to be able to walk away with a stolen belt. But Sulimain saw the illegal shot in real time so set about making it a no contest. The WBC replay was set up to make sure the cheat didn't prosper. Hearn didn't need to do anything. But you think following the rules as it was set up is the biggest rule break in history? You're really f3cked up in the head aren't you? You just project after getting called out for being a clearly biased nationalist that refuses reality to benefit another one of your Mexican cheats. Seriously, you're damaged in the head, man. That WBC rule has been around for years. It's the rules. Hitting someone with a big shot when you know they were down is cheating. The fact you support it and actually claim Martinez was the one cheated shows what an absolute scum bag loony you are.
You're questioning if I now what the rules are? You don't know what irony is do you? You're too ****** for words. You're only fit to be laughed at and mocked as the village idiot you clearly are.
Gennady did hit Lemieux when he was down. But not with a shot anywhere near to the one Martinez wound up. Gennady did so by accident after a combination. whereas Martinez moved to the side when he knew Edwards was down, would up a big shot, then drilled him. That's a big difference. Watch the two of the situations side by side to see the difference. Gennady didn't even hit Lemieux with a big shot. Martinez very much would his punch up as much as he could with intent.
Euro hype job? You mean the "Euro hype job" that beat Canelo the drug cheat twice only to be ripped off twice? The "Euro hype job" that made your cheat bend his knee like a punk and hand over his title because he thought Gennady had too much juice left so wanted to age him out a bit more? This after lying about wanting to fight him by calling his name after one of his fights and calling him to the ring and acting like a fake tough guy? Yeah, Gennady sure made b1tches out of you hoes didn't he. Haha. Everyone knows who won those fights. Everyone knows who the corrupt punk is. Everyone knows who has rehydration clauses on his opponents to weaken them to give him an even bigger advantage. Everyone knows that joke is Canelo. Your corrupt, punk, hero. How very sad.Comment
-
You still running away from my question of whether David Benevidez is a drug cheat according to you? And this after you lied about me running away from questions when it was clearly you. You're doing it again now with this deflection like a punk.
The WBC rules are very clear. But you think the rules are cheating? You're a nationalist to your core.
I've said Gennady did hit Lemieux when he was down. But it was an accident after throwing a combination. You can see Gennady pulled the shot at the very last moment. Martinez wound his up when it was clear Edwards was down and hit him. There's a big difference. You know it too but you can't bare the truth. You're just a coward and corrupted like Canelo is.
Now run away from the question again like you've done so twice now because you're a biased nationalist and a coward.Comment
Comment