If I'm wrong I can admit I'm wrong. Its easy to do, but I'm not gonna admit I'm wrong for something I'm not wrong about.
Analyzing with bias and without goes a far way. For some people the color of their skin is enough to make someone dislike a fighter. Is that right? In my opinion absolutely not.
So when people say things and cant back it up I do have a problem with that. Ignorant criticisms if I ever saw any.
As for best, there is definitely a way to fight who is considered "best"
Again. Take Lomachenko and Canelo.
Lomachenko is and has been fighting the best at 135. If you could name some fighters better than:
Linares (WBA champ)
Pedraza (WBO champ)
Luke Campbell (vacant WBC)
All guys who could be considered top 5 and at the top of the division. One guy lost by TKO, and two other guys lost in WIDE decisions. Competitive but clear results.
Compare that to Canelo 160+
Chavez Jr (at SMW 164)
GGG (WBA,WBC, IBO)
GGG2(WBA, WBC, IBO)
Fielding (168 Regular WBA)
Jacobs (IBF)
Two of those 5 fights were easy wins. Two of then highly debated and controversial. One a complete snooze fest against Jacob's who didnt even make weight.
Not mention now instead of facing the best available, Andrade, Derevychanko, or Charlo he wants to fight Kovalev?
If you're the "best" chances are you're the champion of your division. If you're the best you could have the resume to prove it. And Iife you're the best you've beaten everyone at your weight.
Let me ask you this. Do you think Mikey Garcia fought the "best" when he chose to fight Spence? Or should he have just fought Lomachenko?
Analyzing with bias and without goes a far way. For some people the color of their skin is enough to make someone dislike a fighter. Is that right? In my opinion absolutely not.
So when people say things and cant back it up I do have a problem with that. Ignorant criticisms if I ever saw any.
As for best, there is definitely a way to fight who is considered "best"
Again. Take Lomachenko and Canelo.
Lomachenko is and has been fighting the best at 135. If you could name some fighters better than:
Linares (WBA champ)
Pedraza (WBO champ)
Luke Campbell (vacant WBC)
All guys who could be considered top 5 and at the top of the division. One guy lost by TKO, and two other guys lost in WIDE decisions. Competitive but clear results.
Compare that to Canelo 160+
Chavez Jr (at SMW 164)
GGG (WBA,WBC, IBO)
GGG2(WBA, WBC, IBO)
Fielding (168 Regular WBA)
Jacobs (IBF)
Two of those 5 fights were easy wins. Two of then highly debated and controversial. One a complete snooze fest against Jacob's who didnt even make weight.
Not mention now instead of facing the best available, Andrade, Derevychanko, or Charlo he wants to fight Kovalev?
If you're the "best" chances are you're the champion of your division. If you're the best you could have the resume to prove it. And Iife you're the best you've beaten everyone at your weight.
Let me ask you this. Do you think Mikey Garcia fought the "best" when he chose to fight Spence? Or should he have just fought Lomachenko?
That's straight up on some DUMB SHET. Even Bud had to put fat dan Rafael in his place for talking that dumb shet. And why do you talk about Anthony Crolla like he's some good fighter? I know, its cuz l0m0 knocked him out & you want to make l0m0 look good to overrate like you guys always do....LMMFAO! You dudes aint slick.
OF COURSE he has & his name is SALIDO
I said l0m0 is good but NOT great.
Comment