Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Hearn: I Don't How You Beat Lomachenko; Who's Gonna Beat Him

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Originally posted by angkag View Post
    Only outweighed by 10lbs, ONLY outweighed by 10 lbs......
    He looked huge compared to rig. And you cry about weight???

    Comment


    • #92
      Originally posted by Socialtwinkie View Post
      Let me get this right. You're telling me to beleive you but you have no evidence whatsoever. I have evidence and you do not.
      So, when you've been proved utterly WRONG you feel the absurd need to project your pathetic self onto myself?
      That's pretty damn funny considering one, you've been a member far longer than myself two you post more often then myself.
      Over 8900 posts in 7 years compared to what, 700 in 2 years for myself?
      You got time to do the math BUB?
      P.S. I didnt search for nothing because I watched the whole card with friends. I was there in real time.
      Articles? Please. It was not 5 minutes into then post fight interview that the above was mentioned.
      I would suggest you take the L. I know you ain't gonna look for **** because and I quote
      LOL!!! I tell ya, bubba... I have absolutely nothing against women... but you're definitely sounding like the most whiny of ladies I have ever heard.

      Attack me all you want, I make comments more than you because I'm an old retired man. And I've been into boxing nearly 60 years, so it's fun to me.

      But to the bigger picture, like I said, I'm not going to go digging up stories I read where Loma did say he had some tough moments this past Saturday. And you need to stop insisting it was some super easy fight for him. He was tested, he admits it... just like his opponent admitted he was tested. Just let it the fek go, kid. You're sounding more like a social reject loser with each post.

      Comment


      • #93
        Originally posted by PunchyPotorff View Post
        LOL!!! I tell ya, bubba... I have absolutely nothing against women... but you're definitely sounding like the most whiny of ladies I have ever heard.

        Attack me all you want, I make comments more than you because I'm an old retired man. And I've been into boxing nearly 60 years, so it's fun to me.

        But to the bigger picture, like I said, I'm not going to go digging up stories I read where Loma did say he had some tough moments this past Saturday. And you need to stop insisting it was some super easy fight for him. He was tested, he admits it... just like his opponent admitted he was tested. Just let it the fek go, kid. You're sounding more like a social reject loser with each post.
        You keep talking **** and putting words in peoples mouths and you cant even find any evidence of what anyone actually said.

        For and old man you're dumb as f uck. You claim to be old and retired so you have PLENTY of time to find the article you want but I know you wont find any. Why? Because I already looked because you didnt.

        Did I say it was easy for Lomachenko? No. It was competitive and then it wasnt. Lomachenko was never in trouble of losing and according to himself he was never hurt.

        Tell me old man where in the real damn world you can state your case without any evidence to back it up and expect people to believe you?

        Oh. You're old. I'm expected to take your word for it. Oh. You like throwing passive aggressive shade. Cool story bro.

        Throw all the shade you want. I'm gonna get the last laugh. Wont be me struggling for my last few breaths in a couple years now will I?

        Now go away old man. Idgaf what you have to say because you have nothing

        Comment


        • #94
          Originally posted by Socialtwinkie View Post
          You keep talking **** and putting words in peoples mouths and you cant even find any evidence of what anyone actually said.

          For and old man you're dumb as f uck. You claim to be old and retired so you have PLENTY of time to find the article you want but I know you wont find any. Why? Because I already looked because you didnt.

          Did I say it was easy for Lomachenko? No. It was competitive and then it wasnt. Lomachenko was never in trouble of losing and according to himself he was never hurt.

          Tell me old man where in the real damn world you can state your case without any evidence to back it up and expect people to believe you?

          Oh. You're old. I'm expected to take your word for it. Oh. You like throwing passive aggressive shade. Cool story bro.

          Throw all the shade you want. I'm gonna get the last laugh. Wont be me struggling for my last few breaths in a couple years now will I?

          Now go away old man. Idgaf what you have to say because you have nothing
          See that bolded part? Yeah, that’s very low, and that’s where you prove that you’re an insecure immature little bitch.

          Comment


          • #95
            Originally posted by Vlad_ View Post
            See that bolded part? Yeah, that’s very low, and that’s where you prove that you’re an insecure immature little bitch.
            You act as if I threw that out there because I got emotional about it. No. I knew exactly what I said and how I intended it. It was the lowest if the low and in my opinion deserved.

            He wants to continue to throw passive aggressive shade? GOOD. He wants to believe no evidence is the best evidence and his word is true? GOOD

            I'm not gonna sit here and entertain none of that ****.

            You want to think less of me? Good for you. Ask me how much I care?

            Comment


            • #96
              Originally posted by Socialtwinkie View Post
              You keep talking **** and putting words in peoples mouths and you cant even find any evidence of what anyone actually said.
              For and old man you're dumb as f uck. You claim to be old and retired so you have PLENTY of time to find the article you want but I know you wont find any. Why? Because I already looked because you didnt.
              Did I say it was easy for Lomachenko? No. It was competitive and then it wasnt. Lomachenko was never in trouble of losing and according to himself he was never hurt.
              Tell me old man where in the real damn world you can state your case without any evidence to back it up and expect people to believe you?
              Oh. You're old. I'm expected to take your word for it. Oh. You like throwing passive aggressive shade. Cool story bro.
              Throw all the shade you want. I'm gonna get the last laugh. Wont be me struggling for my last few breaths in a couple years now will I?
              Now go away old man. Idgaf what you have to say because you have nothing
              "It was competitive and then it wasnt"

              Typical DA millennial. Nothing but hot air on steroids.

              Comment


              • #97
                Originally posted by Truth Serum View Post
                "Hurt" in Ukrainian means "tickled my balls"... Remember that low blow?
                HAHA thats funny.... no i didnt see the low blow, in fact i didnt even watch the fight i just saw the highlights,

                but i just heard the interview where loma said he hurt him and he had alot of power!!

                Comment


                • #98
                  I made an account because I'm a boxing fan

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    Originally posted by MrShakeAndBake View Post
                    You made an account just for this ? lol
                    I made an account because I'm a boxing fan

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP