Comments Thread For: Commey: Canelo, Crawford, Spence, Wilder Are Above Loma

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Rip Chudd
    1 John 2:22
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jun 2010
    • 22689
    • 1,932
    • 1,321
    • 260,351

    #91
    Originally posted by Nay_Sayer
    Like what? LOSE?
    Nope, beat the caliber of people he has. His resume is better than both. Wilder also lost to Fury but was saved on the cards. Dude has one good win on his resume in Ortiz. Being undefeated means nothing if you aren't beating the other good fighters in your division

    Comment

    • JakeTheBoxer
      undisputed champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Dec 2014
      • 21129
      • 4,620
      • 2,797
      • 123,960

      #92
      Originally posted by Rip Chudd
      Nope, beat the caliber of people he has. His resume is better than both. Wilder also lost to Fury but was saved on the cards. Dude has one good win on his resume in Ortiz. Being undefeated means nothing if you aren't beating the other good fighters in your division
      Yes. Crawford and Spence being undefeated means nothing because they beat nearly nobody in 147 division.

      Comment

      • TSA20
        Amateur
        Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
        • Aug 2019
        • 4
        • 0
        • 0
        • 1,221

        #93
        I'm with Comment, lomachenko is so overrated, let's see him fight someone, rigondeaux moved up two weight classes to fight him,let's see lomachenko move up and fight Crawford,Mayweather started off at lightweight and moved all the way up dominating every division while moving up, let's see lomachenko do that, this guy hasn't fought anyone

        Comment

        • ShoulderRoll
          Join The Great Resist
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Oct 2009
          • 56067
          • 10,100
          • 5,028
          • 763,445

          #94
          Originally posted by Shape up
          Then by that explanation everything Canelo can do lomachenko does it better and then some
          Not really. They have different styles and skillsets.

          And as we know the Mexican style already gave Lomachenko fits and handed him his first loss.

          Comment

          • BoZz
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Apr 2009
            • 8812
            • 876
            • 779
            • 45,907

            #95
            Of course they are because bumachenko is a cherry picking fraud but mentioning wilder the guy who got toyed by fury is plain ******ed...#1 p4p is tyson fury..a 35% fury toyed with the so called American HW champ...the rest is not important...all those names he mentioned are people who made a name for themselves fighting bums..i gotta show respect to Canelo tho..the kid fights who ever they put in front of him and he exposed the fraud bumlovkin lol

            Comment

            • Tosaken
              Contender
              • Aug 2019
              • 109
              • 39
              • 15
              • 2,515

              #96
              Loma should fight Pacquiao or Mikey Garcia at 140.

              Comment

              • j.razor
                Undisputed Champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jun 2007
                • 23786
                • 265
                • 0
                • 227,586,034

                #97
                Originally posted by Joe shmo
                👌 Sure thing buddy, whatever u say. I'll just go ahead and let u tell it.
                That's exactly what you do....

                Comment

                • The Big Dunn
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Sep 2009
                  • 69632
                  • 9,697
                  • 8,013
                  • 287,568

                  #98
                  I have Crawford at 1 and Loma at 2. Canelo and Spence IMO are top 6, behind both of these guys, Usuk and Inoue.

                  Wilder is nowhere near the even the top 20 p4p imo. Frankly I would he hard pressed to put him on the top 50.

                  Comment

                  • j.razor
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Jun 2007
                    • 23786
                    • 265
                    • 0
                    • 227,586,034

                    #99
                    Originally posted by daggum
                    no he hasn't. he's beaten one top guy in the division. usyk beat gassiev who is ranked #1 right now, breidis who is ranked #2 right now and glowacki who is ranked #4 right now and was even higher ranked when usyk beat him. brook is a good win but mikey garcia was laughable. thats like usyk beating callum smith
                    That one top guy is better than usyk's whole career. Stop playin' your games just cuz YOU like usyk. When he gets K.O.'d by D.Wilder you gon keep singing that same B.S. OH WAIT, he aint got the balls to fight D.Wilder!

                    Comment

                    • j.razor
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Jun 2007
                      • 23786
                      • 265
                      • 0
                      • 227,586,034

                      #100
                      Originally posted by steeve steel
                      I agree with most... but to pretend Spence has a better resume than Usyk, well... that's just nonsense.
                      He has, usyk hasn't beat any good fighters better than brook, its not really his fault cuz there was no one at CW but now he's at HW so I bet he won't beat Fury, D.Wilder, Ruiz or Ortiz. If Errol gets past porter then that's another good fighter & unification of another belt from a solid champion.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP