How do people determine if ur #1 p4p

[Divine Hammer]

That’s horrible. Lmao seriously horrible. It’s Really bad. Fix it.

its the only correct non biased top 5. how does spence deserve top 5?????? crawford beat who recently???? and crawford best win still a small past prime gamboa. joke. canelo failed multiple drug tests so he is automatically will forever be off my list. disqualified.

[Ritz Kola]

its the only correct non biased top 5. how does spence deserve top 5?????? crawford beat who recently???? and crawford best win still a small past prime gamboa. joke. canelo failed multiple drug tests so he is automatically will forever be off my list. disqualified.

Who said anything about Spence or Crawford lmao. It’s strange you singled out those two particular fighters who have something genetic in common. Can’t quite put my finger on it tho...

But that list was horrible. I didn’t say anything about biased either but I’m glad you’re feeling guilty and telling on yourself.

Just fix the list.

[Real King Kong]

Four Things

Record: W/L/D + KOs

Resume: Names. Meaning “who” or better, “what” caliber of opponents

I’ll interlude here to to explain the difference. Fight A can be 13 n 0 (record) against nobodies (resume). Fighter B can be 12-4 with 3 elite names; of those names he lost to and one he beat. Fighter A has the better record but Fighter B has the better resume.

Accolades/Accomplishments: What have they accomplished in the sport. How many times have they been champion or have they never lost? How many divisions? We’re they unified? Undisputed? What this doesn’t include is arbitrary and irrelevant things like FOTY or How much money they make...that’s personal bias or promoter concerns.

Performance: This isn’t about if you like a certain style or find a fighter boring or exciting. It’s about what it says- Performances. Do they struggle with every opponent or do they make it look easy?

I’ll give an example here too. Fighter A gets knocked down three times against Jim but comes back to end the fight in the 10th by KO. Fighter B breezes through every round against Jim, winning the fight by UD- there were no Knockdowns. Fighter B performed better. You preferring A because he got up 3x and it excited you is irrelevant and personal. Fighter B performs much better at his job.

That’s the best way to gauge p4p and that’s how I do so. It’s unbiased and touches all bases.

The fantasy p4p distinction was made to compare fighters of different weights head to head. Who would beat who, all things equal. It’s now morphed into something different.