Comments Thread For: Derevyanchenko's Trainer: Triple-G Fighting Rolls Was Ridiculous

[GhostofDempsey]

Canelo (more like GBP) Call Triple Gåy for a fight in May and he decline it back in january-february and some of you Fåggs defended that bïtch move by saying he was within his right to refuse it because Canelo does not dictate GGG's career. What changed?

Another clown writing his own story here. Canelo don’t want that rubber match, not then and not now. He knows he lost those fights and Santa came early.

[aboutfkntime]

a shame that Golovkin's idiot fanbase needed Rozier to tell them that Steve Rolls was a shltty UNNECESSARY opponent

[Realizniguhnit]

Canelo haters justify Rolls and say GGG needed a “stay busy” after a long layoff whereas Canelo right after GGG fought Fielding to “stay busy.”

GGG fanboys are the gayest breed of gay

My comment had nothing to do with Canelo, I don't hate Canelo but I don't have his nutz all in my mouth like you do.

[whoseyourdaddy]

Wrong , CANELO was & still is fighting the best while Andrade & Charlo fought & fight the rest.

For example CANELO fought the undefeated Austin Trout in a unification fight while Charlo's best win is an old shot Trout. Andrade's resume is so trash I don't even know who his best win is. Plus CANELO fought & best Lara while Charlo & Andrade ducked Lara.

At 160 CANELO fought GGG twice & Jacobs, who has Andrade & Charlo fought at 160? Boxing is about walking the walk not talking the talk.

And many if not most people saw Trout edge that fight.

[whoseyourdaddy]

Man mfers love acting like GGG the first mfer to take a bs opponent keep busy fight. You'd think GGG invited the whole concept of the bs opponent how some mfers talk like.

Well when your whole career consists of 95% tomato cans one would think GGG went above and beyond that concept.

[aaronbnb]

People thought Pacquiao might be past it after so many wars so Pac went out and fought a young, undefeated champion in Thurman. Even already having earned the right to take whatever fight. Coming off draw/loss that GGG thought he actually won, GGG fought Vanes and Steve Rolls. That's all that needs to be said about the two.

[whoseyourdaddy]

Ahh picking someone from the bottom of the barrel. Reminds me of Wilders whole career till he fought a senior citizen in Ortiz. Clenero had his Fielding, ggg had his Rolls. Alot of boxers do that to stay busy.
Stop hating or you'll get high blood pressure like Ortiz.

The problem is that GGG also has the Ishidas, the Wades, the Rosado, McKlins, the Proskas, Stevens, the Guiles, Rolls, and the list goes on and on and on. Or in other words, 95% of his career consists of taco vendors, janitors and Uber drivers.

[whoseyourdaddy]

Another clown writing his own story here. Canelo don’t want that rubber match, not then and not now. He knows he lost those fights and Santa came early.

Fuçk out of here, the report was written here on this site now you conveniently don't remember? you were one of those fåggs defending GGG from that bïtch move so now you suffer from Alzheimer's? GTFOH!!

[whoseyourdaddy]

My comment had nothing to do with Canelo, I don't hate Canelo but I don't have his nutz all in my mouth like you do.

No you dont have them in your mouth but up your @ss.

[Thuglife Nelo]

My comment had nothing to do with Canelo, I don't hate Canelo but I don't have his nutz all in my mouth like you do.

So let’s review your *****ness:

GGG fanboys and supposed non Canelo haters like yourself can’t conpare that Canelo’s tune-up with Fielding 3 months after the GGG rematch isn’t justified yet GGG was allowed a tune up with Rolls more than 9months away.

To say that’s nuts in a mouth clearly shows that you’re a hom0sexual loving GGG. Your only salvation is to say, “tbh, I just hate Canelo.” At least that would be honest and non gay. Otherwise you ain’t fooling anybody. Stick to boxing analytics, not *****ness