Comments Thread For: Figueroa-Chacon Main Event on FS1 Peaked At 421,000 Viewers

[Albertocrn]

Ok so to you he’s not a “true boxing fan”.....now do you feel like you have a giant swanstuka?

First of all wtf is a swanstuka?? You mean a swastika??? Second what does supposedly having that have to do with anything what me and the other dude were talking about??? I ain't white so explain...

[killakali]

You’re delusional if you think 400k people paid $20 to watch Estrada vs Beamon.

FOX killing DAZN. #facts

FS1 is in almost as many homes as espn yet doesn’t get half the views. #facts

Plus on espn Deportes in Mexico Estrada got more than double the views this fs1 Card headlines by a Mexican got #facts

[Bob Haymon]

PBC even had some shoulder programming for this "world title" fight and is trying to make Figueroa into a star. This is a total flop. Google Trends had this fight at 198th place on their realtime chart. The Kovalev fight which was in the morning and on ESPN+ was able to make it into the top 10 and the Estrada fight which was also a mismatch was also significantly higher than PBC. FS1 can't even manage to get Fury-Schwarz Prelim numbers. FS1 is the real dead zone.

[KTFOKING]

Interested in seeing what kind of gate this card did. Looked like a decent amount of people showed up, but just how many of those were actually from paid tickets?

[Bob Haymon]

Actual footage of PBC viewership on FS1:

[IMG]https://media.*****.com/media/1Zbeweu52ZaQE/*****.gif[/IMG]

[asgarth]

You’re delusional if you think 400k people paid $20 to watch Estrada vs Beamon.

FOX killing DAZN. #facts

You dont really understand how subscription services work. People don't pay for a particular card. It''s either for a month or for a year.

If you really like boxing, there is no reason for not paying the 99$ for a year, because you already get two canelo fights which under past circumstances would have cost more than that.

If you still dont think it's good value for the money, you probably will never be convinced, because you are 1) a pbc fanboy (see oldskoolg), which is ******

and/or 2) someone who cant adapt to new technology (see oldskoolg).

and/or 3) too cheap, but then you should also complain about the flood of PPVs currently.

[Stokely]

Actual footage of PBC viewership on FS1:

[IMG]https://media.*****.com/media/1Zbeweu52ZaQE/*****.gif[/IMG]

Haha if FS1's viewership is a desert then what is DAZN's? Based on google trends, Brandon Figueroa got more attention fighting on FS1 than Juan Francisco Estrada did on DAZN.

Stay mad fan boy

[Bob Haymon]

Haha if FS1's viewership is a desert then what is DAZN's? Based on google trends, Brandon Figueroa got more attention fighting on FS1 than Juan Francisco Estrada did on DAZN.

Stay mad fan boy

And yet Bellator was higher on Nielsen's social content ratings charts despite having even fewer viewers than FS1.
nielsensocial.com/socialcontentratings/weekly/#SeriesSpecials
You're only seeing what you want to see and using the data which fits your narrative.

The Estrada fight was ranked much higher on the Google Trends realtime trends chart which is a more accurate representation of live viewership. The Estrada fight wasn't even in the US so it makes sense there wasn't as much buzz, but realtime interest was still much higher for that fight. Another chart that doesn't fit your narrative is this one: https://trends.google.com/trends/exp...ker%20figueroa
When you remove the ambiguety due to their common names and search for their nicknames "Gallito Estrada" has a lot more interest than "Heartbreaker Figueroa".

[YoungManRumble]

Nothing about this event was worth bragging about.

[Stokely]

And yet Bellator was higher on Nielsen's social content ratings charts despite having even fewer viewers than FS1.
nielsensocial.com/socialcontentratings/weekly/#SeriesSpecials
You're only seeing what you want to see and using the data which fits your narrative.

The Estrada fight was ranked much higher on the Google Trends realtime trends chart which is a more accurate representation of live viewership. The Estrada fight wasn't even in the US so it makes sense there wasn't as much buzz, but realtime interest was still much higher for that fight. Another chart that doesn't fit your narrative is this one: https://trends.google.com/trends/exp...ker%20figueroa
When you remove the ambiguety due to their common names and search for their nicknames "Gallito Estrada" has a lot more interest than "Heartbreaker Figueroa".

First of all, that's Bellator on Paramount which is a TV channel. Not Bellator on DAZN. Try again idiot. Second of all, you inserted their nicknames "gallito estrada" and "heartbreaker figueroa" to skew the results. When you insert their actual names, "Brandon Figueroa" and "Juan Francisco Estrada" then you'd see that Figueroa got the higher interest score which means he got more attention fighting on FS1 than Estrada did fighting on DAZN. In this screenshot, I included Estrada's nicknames to the searches just like you did but on the August 24th date, the day they both fought, you can still see that Figueroa dwarfs Estrada when it comes to attention garnered.


So my question to you again; If FS1's viewership is a desert, then what does that make DAZN's? Since a relatively unknown prospect in Figueroa was viewed by more people than the supposed P4P Estrada.