GGG's resume is better than you think, definitely HOF worthy

[Boxing_1013]

the word i used was prime, so yes it would appear there is someone here who "just wants to argue" unabated.

try again, this time use the post not your imagination.

it certainly wasnt a stellar win, nowhere near it.
But it's still a good win and when you combine that win with about 15 other ones of the same nature...except in all the other ones G showed no real signs of vulnerability at all...well I just think that is exceptional for any fighter, and history proves that to be correct when you look at other greats' resumes...if that upsets you and you want to try to spin it to suit your worldview, feel free my friend!! Have a great day, sincerely

[/QUOTE]

Ok man have a great day!

[aboutfkntime]

Boxing1013..... WALL OF ******ITY

guys, if anyone is ****** enough to take Boxing1013 seriously...

this is his legacy...


thinks that Golovkin has a better resume than Canelo.....

I just made a thread about specifically why people rate Canelo's resume as better than GGG's...and I laid out my case as to why I rate GGG's better.....
https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...d.php?t=820918

----------------------------

thinks that one of the " killers " on Golovkin's resume could have beaten Canelo.... but he will not say which one LMAO

I don't think Canelo would have gotten all of his guys out by KO and maybe would not have 'won' all of them.....
https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...820918&page=10

----------------------------

thinks that Murray Lemieux Monroe and Vanes, are better wins for Golovkin..... than Lara Cotto Trout and Mosley, are for Canelo.....

Canelo's top wins would be Lara..Jacobs and Cotto imo...GGG's would be Jacobs, Murray and Lemieux...I don't see a ton of separation there..... winning 7-5 vs a great Lara...and going 12 with a shot fat Cotto...is not imo better than 8 Round destruction of Lemieux...and 11 round destruction of Murray..... Vanes was inactive and moving up in weight...but he wasn't shot like SSM more or less was..... I don't think going 12 with Mosley when Canelo did, or 12 with Trout, are better wins than GGG running through Monroe and Geale.....
https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...820918&page=16

----------------------------


thinks that Andre Ward is no better than Bika Barrera and Miranda

I just never really saw the skills from him..... if he was born in a different country I don't think he would have been looked at much differently than Bika Barrera or Miranda etc.....
https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...2#post19903762

----------------------------

thinks that Golovkin has 5-6 'great' wins..... but cannot even name 1 of those 'great' wins

Yeah he has about 10+ good wins imo...and 5-6 'great' wins if you want to term it that...great fighter, great career...an ATG at MW...that's pretty clear I think..... If a great win is a dominant win over another prime great fighter...I would say GGG has quite a few tbh.....
https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...821123&page=20

----------------------------

creates a thread misquoting Steve Weisfeld.....

Boxing1013 attempted to remove defence, ring generalship, and effective aggression, as official scoring criteria..... to justify why he thinks Golovkin beat Canelo in their rematch..... but, had NO IDEA that Steve Weisfeld was AN OFFICIAL JUDGE at the Canelo/Golovkin rematch..... and Weisfeld scored that fight for Canelo looool
https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...d.php?t=818903

-------------------------------

thinks that Golovkin has faced more quality opposition than almost any other fighter in history.....

never had a slip up against quality opposition, and he faced probably more of them than almost any other fighter in history...

https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...d.php?t=824905

-------------------------------

thinks that Lemieux, Murray... are the same level of Canelo/Jacobs

Lemieux, Murray pretty clearly around the level of SD Canelo Jacobs...
https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...9#post20112309

[ralph-p4p]

I thought the first fight vs canelo was a draw due to canelo landing the cleaner punches and more power punches and canelo did win the second.

[Boxing_1013]

guys, if anyone is ****** enough to take Boxing1013 seriously...

this is his legacy...


thinks that Golovkin has a better resume than Canelo.....


----------------------------

thinks that one of the " killers " on Golovkin's resume could have beaten Canelo.... but he will not say which one LMAO


----------------------------

thinks that Murray Lemieux Monroe and Vanes, are better wins for Golovkin..... than Lara Cotto Trout and Mosley, are for Canelo.....


----------------------------


thinks that Andre Ward is no better than Bika Barrera and Miranda


----------------------------

thinks that Golovkin has 5-6 'great' wins..... but cannot even name 1 of those 'great' wins


----------------------------

creates a thread misquoting Steve Weisfeld.....


-------------------------------

thinks that Golovkin has faced more quality opposition than almost any other fighter in history.....

If anyone wishes to engage in gentlemanly debate with me about Canelo/GGG resumes...Ward's career relative to Bika/Barrera and Miranda etc...why those 4 wins for GGG are impressive (hint dominant stoppages matter more than 12 round tight 'wins')...I am all ears...always up for a good friendly debate.

I've listed GGG's best wins...they are obvious...I've listed the guys on G's resume who I think could have given Canelo trouble...and I said one of them could have beaten him...let me bold this for you - this means that out of 5 guys that would be bad matchups for Canelo, while he would be the favorite in maybe all of them, he very possibly could lose one of them.

Not really earth shattering stuff...not sure why you take everything so personal lol...you get so emotional man lol...already addressed the Weisfeld thing as well...waste of time with you lol

[ruedboy]

Lara, Cotto, Trout and Mosley are considered top wins by diva fans.
Lara, Contoversial SD
Cotto,small, faded, had already lost 4X and been KO'd 2X
by the time he lost by UD to Alvarez.
Trout, a guy who loses (5X) every time he steps up in class
Mosley, 42 yrs old, and a 7X loser when he lost to the diva by decision.
Both Cotto and Mosely stood toe to toe with the diva and lost by decisions. The much smaller Pacquiao had Cotto down a few times before they finally stopped the slaughter. Mosley got knocked down in the 3rd and spent the rest of the fight just trying to survive.
The diva's wins were better than losing, but Pac's wins are what you call a good win.

[aboutfkntime]

Golovkin's resume is rubbish

name a supposed top fighter with a worse resume than Golovkin?

promised the world:
" anyone from 154-168 "

delivered almost nothing:
- Jacobs*
- Lemieux
- Murray

that is the very dictionary definition of an underachiever

name a supposedly top fighter with a worse resume than Golovkin?

fans (rightly) criticize Arturo Gatti for being in the HOF

but Gatti probably has a better resume than Hypekin

Gatti knocked out all those mid-level guys... just like Hypekin did

#underachiever

[DreamFighter]

what great wins has Canelo got? I dont get it....it took him to the age of 35 to make a single good defence against a the top contender with jacobs, let alone a great win.

Lemieux is a good win, but great? Lemmys haircut was greater than his resume.

You know, I'm not knocking his 3 year run from Lemieux to Canelo, its very respectable for a champion. But thats all it is, dont make out its some ATG/HOF title run.... if it is then the HOF/ATG ranks just got quadrupled in size with all the other people with runs like Golovkin.

Dont give GGG a free pass just cos hes called GGG, he should earn his place along with everyone else.