Let's have removed the Pac/Floyd investigation thread.

[Nash out]

It's absolutely ******, four years overdue its welcome, there never was need for an investigation or debate, only a minor review of a fight TBE dominated from start to finish (except R4 and R6) 118-110. It makes us boxing fans look ****** having such a brainless thread go on and on and on to try and make it seem like Pac was robbed in a fight he loss very easily.

I'm sick of seeing it and all the idiot comments. Who's in favour for its removal?

[Marchegiano]

Of the ****ing passport spam....**** these mods are ****.

Y'all read that, you know it's true; you ****.

[daggum]

or you could just not go in it? floyd didn't dominate. pac landed the better punches. this is a boxing forum. dont try to eliminate all other opinions. deal with it.

[Nash out]

or you could just not go in it? floyd didn't dominate. pac landed the better punches. this is a boxing forum. dont try to eliminate all other opinions. deal with it.

TBE won at least 9 rounds. It was one-sided, let's get real. I'm a ATG and HOF poster on here, so I know what I'm talking about. Anyone trying to say Pac won, or drew or that is was very close, should go and watch another sport. Netball is very simple to follow, try that.

[FredWreck]

TBE won at least 9 rounds. It was one-sided, let's get real. I'm a ATG and HOF poster on here, so I know what I'm talking about. Anyone trying to say Pac won, or drew or that is was very close, should go and watch another sport. Netball is very simple to follow, try that.

Dominated how?
By running hugging and clinching? He literally didn’t do anything bro. He beat him “on points”. It was pathetic.

[daggum]

TBE won at least 9 rounds. It was one-sided, let's get real. I'm a ATG and HOF poster on here, so I know what I'm talking about. Anyone trying to say Pac won, or drew or that is was very close, should go and watch another sport. Netball is very simple to follow, try that.

ok you are the greatest of all time poster. that is clear, but since you are the greatest you should be able to explain how it was one-sided. your evidence is...what? compubox? compubox is straight up wrong. it said floyd landed 10 power shots in round 3. he landed zero. thats a pretty big disparity so we can throw that crap out. is your argument that it was boring and slow paced? didnt know that meant floyd auto-wins. you should be asking who did better in the slow paced boring fight. who landed the beter puncher in the slow paced boring fight. i can tell you it wasn't floyd. there is no substance to say floyd dominated besides appealing to popularity.

[WholeSoul75]

These debate is a classic who won the street fight vs boxing match. If clinching was a part of fighting then we know who won the fight.

But this was last Vegas boxing. Not a fight between two warriors.

[QueensburyRules]

It's absolutely ******, four years overdue its welcome, there never was need for an investigation or debate, only a minor review of a fight TBE dominated from start to finish (except R4 and R6) 118-110. It makes us boxing fans look ****** having such a brainless thread go on and on and on to try and make it seem like Pac was robbed in a fight he loss very easily.

I'm sick of seeing it and all the idiot comments. Who's in favour for its removal?

- -Obviously TUE 50-0 filled the vacuousness of yer noggin'

That giant sucking sound was his multi retirement fights.

Nobody that counts misses him.

[daggum]

These debate is a classic who won the street fight vs boxing match. If clinching was a part of fighting then we know who won the fight.

But this was last Vegas boxing. Not a fight between two warriors.

so if someone hits you with 10 flush power shots and you graze him with a couple jabs and clinch him you won the fight? i dont understand. good clinch cheats like ward and wlad always landed the better punches to go with the clinching(cept against kovalev of course) but floyd didnt do that. he got outlanded in hard clean shots so his strategy didn't even work. i mean it worked to prevent pac from hitting him even more but it didnt work to give him the overall advantage(unless you believe compubox which would be ****** since they think he landed 10 power punches in round 3 when he landed zero)

[WholeSoul75]

so if someone hits you with 10 flush power shots and you graze him with a couple jabs and clinch him you won the fight? i dont understand. good clinch cheats like ward and wlad always landed the better punches to go with the clinching(cept against kovalev of course) but floyd didnt do that. he got outlanded in hard clean shots so his strategy didn't even work. i mean it worked to prevent pac from hitting him even more but it didnt work to give him the overall advantage(unless you believe compubox which would be ****** since they think he landed 10 power punches in round 3 when he landed zero)

I agree with Pac, Floyd lost the fight. In this sport, Floyd was allowed to fight a certain way and win a boxing match with 3 judges deciding. Hey you can lose a fight but be awarded a win. But the beautiful thing is we all have our own opinion.