he's only lost to top guys, and has some really good scalps on his record. his upset of browne was huge. i think he's vastly underrated.
pascal resume
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Bute, Dawson, I thought he won the first Hopkins fight, and Diaconu is a really good scalp IMO, and he's got it twice.
but agreed, no HOF. Though had he gotten the win over Hopkins, that would give him wins over Diaconu, Branco, Diaconu, Dawson and Hopkins in five straight fights. Might be a different discussion had that happened.Comment
-
I’ve never been that high on Bute tbh man, I always thought he was an accident waiting to happen after the Andrade fights and Froch completely exposed him and he was never the same IMO.Bute, Dawson, I thought he won the first Hopkins fight, and Diaconu is a really good scalp IMO, and he's got it twice.
but agreed, no HOF. Though had he gotten the win over Hopkins, that would give him wins over Diaconu, Branco, Diaconu, Dawson and Hopkins in five straight fights. Might be a different discussion had that happened.
I had the first Hopkins fight 114-112 to B-Hop. Pascal just couldn’t adjust in the mid to later rounds after B-Hop worked him out.
Dawson was a great win, he was the next big thing at 175 before he ran into Pascal.
Fair point, Diaconu was a solid win(s) too, he was a decent fighter.
Pascal’s had a good career but unless he does something spectacular in his last few fights, the HOF is step too far.Comment
-
Comment
-
Pascal win over Browne was good but it only highlighted frochs resume to me. After that polish no hopes froch fought nothing but killers(and yusaf mack) one of the best consistent runs of top quality opposition I of recent years undoubtedly. Which highlights wards resume.Comment
Comment