If Floyd was a cherry picker then what are your current fighters picking??

[BoloShot]

???????????????? Not ATG?

Would you consider a top 50 fighter ever ATG? I don't know what kind of bar you're setting so please explain.

[Code Red]

So, that answer is none?
IF he went up to 160 to fight GGG, the betting odds would not be worse than in Pac fighting him

That would have been like Leonard fighting Hagler .

Except you're wrong, Ray started his career at 147, Floyd 130, you don't see a significant size and weight difference?

[OCPancho]

Except you're wrong, Ray started his career at 147, Floyd 130, you don't see a significant size and weight difference?

Don't matter.
Leonard fought Hagler and was 3-1 underdog going in the week of the fight .
He was also off for years .

That would be like Floyd coming back now and fighting someone and be a 3-1 underdog.
No matter what weight division .

Floyd has never been 3-1 underdog EVER.
Pac and Hopkins have been .

[Buckfever]

I don't think he was a cherry picker per se. I think he looked at the situation with Golden Boy and how he felt he wasn't being compensated commensurate with his skills and then became very strategic as to how he selected his opponents to shift the dollars in his favor.

I think he woke up and realized that the game had changed so that compensation was no longer based on merit and responded accordingly.

[djtmal]

https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...d.php?t=308325

Hatton, Corrales, and Alvarez are the best prime guys. I don't think anybody's mistaking them for high rank prime atg fighters.*
Take it for what it's worth.*

Floyd Boys get the sniffles that there isn't more widespread respect for the resume post Oscar, but fear not Floyd Boys. For your never ending loyalty Floyd has free tickets for you for his next sideshow, um I mean boxing match.

You want to do some research? Google Floyd cherrypicking and see what happens.

Anyways don't worry Larry. Dunn, Iron Dan, and the rest of the Floyd Boys will help you dig up old posts of mine. Lol.

[UNBIASED BOXING]

ok??? same Salido YEARS!!!!!!!!!!!! LATER BEAT LOMA

LMAO, For years everyone on here ragged on Loma for losing to Salido. "Uber driver", "Bum", "so many losses on his record". They still do even though he's beaten better fighters since then.

Now you're trying to claim it as a great win for an ATG boxer?

Hypocrisy at it's finest

[daggum]

I don't think he was a cherry picker per se. I think he looked at the situation with Golden Boy and how he felt he wasn't being compensated commensurate with his skills and then became very strategic as to how he selected his opponents to shift the dollars in his favor.

I think he woke up and realized that the game had changed so that compensation was no longer based on merit and responded accordingly.

what you just described is cherry picking

[Larry the boss]

LMAO, For years everyone on here ragged on Loma for losing to Salido. "Uber driver", "Bum", "so many losses on his record". They still do even though he's beaten better fighters since then.

Now you're trying to claim it as a great win for an ATG boxer?

Hypocrisy at it's finest

show me where i said that

[Larry the boss]

OP will gladly pay for this:

yes i would for my son, he would remember it forever

[daggum]

yes i would for my son, he would remember it forever

he would remember how you wasted your money and lose all respect for you forever