Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Max Kellerman: Manny Pacquiao has a case for the best pound-for-pound fighter ever

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by The Noose View Post
    why does boxrec say "suspended by Nevada Athletic Commission until 2019-08-20"??


    ummm..... wtf ?


    Manny Pacquiao ID# 006129
    suspended by Nevada Athletic Commission until 2019-08-20
    https://boxrec.com/en/proboxer/6129

    Comment


    • Originally Posted by aboutfkntime
      FACT: there is only one criteria for greatness

      WHO did you beat, with consideration given to when/how

      paper titles mean absolutely nothing, because.....

      FACT: if Armstrong fought in a era that had 100+ world "titles", and 17 different divisions..... rather than a era with 8 world champions, and 8 divisions..... he would have truckloads of the rubbish that Max calls "achievements"

      which is why Mayweather is CLEARLY greater than Pacquiao

      Pac has anonymous paper " titles "..... Mayweather has names

      " margarito "
      " David Diaz "
      " Chris Algieri "
      " Thurman "

      whoop-de-shlt




      Originally posted by puga View Post
      lol and you had the nerve to tell others here they dont know **** about boxing , pretentious lil ****er


      what was incorrect in that post, you silly pacstain ?

      aside from struggling to match the height of Mayweather's best wins, you cannot be losing to average guys like Torrecampo, Sungsurat, Horn..... and go life-n-death with fighters who are not on Floyd's level, like Marquez and Bradley..... and then expect to be rated higher than Floyd..... it makes no sense

      Comment


      • Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
        ummm..... wtf ?


        Manny Pacquiao ID# 006129

        https://boxrec.com/en/proboxer/6129
        Because he can’t fight there again so soon after he has just fought. I believe it’s at least a month after a 12 round fight, and more if it was a knockout loss

        Comment


        • Originally posted by ikigai View Post
          Pac is pretty high up there but I would put him below Ali, Lennox Lewis, Sugar Ray leonard, Marvin Hagler, Bernard Hopkins.

          I have Manny Pacquiao right under Bernard Hopkins.
          Heavies need not apply to p4p lists. You must be a noob or casual

          Comment


          • Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
            what was incorrect in that post, you silly pacstain ?

            aside from struggling to match the height of Mayweather's best wins, you cannot be losing to average guys like Torrecampo, Sungsurat, Horn..... and go life-n-death with fighters who are not on Floyd's level, like Marquez and Bradley..... and then expect to be rated higher than Floyd..... it makes no sense
            Your just a complete blatant comedian , trying to be serious?
            Pac s best wins easily surpass floyds the world knows that.
            Pac can lose to Torecampo and sungsurat as he was not at his best or prime he was work in progress back then, and malnourished and no proper trainer so those losses impact very little on Pacs legacy. If Pac lost to those guys in his prime there would be grounds for discussion though.
            Floyd went life and death with guys not on Pac s level. You can't be losing to guys like Castillo in prime and making guys like maidana look elite and beating common opponents not as dominant as Pac, and having not as in depth resume, with CWs and bloating up 2 divisions whilst cheating scales as best wins, and be rated higher than pac. It makes no sense
            Last edited by hugh grant; 08-04-2019, 05:27 PM.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by hugh grant View Post
              Your just a complete blatant comedian , trying to be serious?
              Pac s best wins easily surpass floyds the world knows that.
              Pac can lose to Torecampo and sungsurat as he was not at his best or prime he was work in progress back then, and malnourished and no proper trainer so those losses impact very little on Pacs legacy. If Pac lost to those guys in his prime there would be grounds for discussion though.
              Floyd went life and death with guys not on Pac s level. You can't be losing to guys like Castillo in prime and making guys like maidana look elite and beating common opponents not as dominant as Pac and be rated higher than pac. It makes no sense
              Aboutfkntime is a comedian. LMAO.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by pasawayako View Post
                Aboutfkntime is a comedian. LMAO.
                Yes he's a blatant, not very subtle comedian.
                He thinks Torecampo loss should impact Pac s legacy? But you look at Pac back then compared to now Pac is completely different. If you look at Floyd at 18 years old he probably isn't much different to 25 year old Floyd or 34 year old. So it wasn't really necessary for floyd to pad out early career with so many bums
                Last edited by hugh grant; 08-04-2019, 05:43 PM.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by hugh grant View Post
                  Your just a complete blatant comedian , trying to be serious?
                  Pac s best wins easily surpass floyds the world knows that.
                  Pac can lose to Torecampo and sungsurat as he was not at his best or prime he was work in progress back then, and malnourished and no proper trainer so those losses impact very little on Pacs legacy. If Pac lost to those guys in his prime there would be grounds for discussion though.
                  Floyd went life and death with guys not on Pac s level. You can't be losing to guys like Castillo in prime and making guys like maidana look elite and beating common opponents not as dominant as Pac, and having not as in depth resume, with CWs and bloating up 2 divisions whilst cheating scales as best wins, and be rated higher than pac. It makes no sense



                  then..... NAME THAT WIN, YOU SHlT-TALKING CLOWN !!

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by hugh grant View Post
                    Yes he's a blatant, not very subtle comedian.
                    He thinks Torecampo loss should impact Pac s legacy? But you look at Pac back then compared to now Pac is completely different. If you look at Floyd at 18 years old he probably isn't much different to 25 year old Floyd or 34 year old. So it wasn't really necessary for floyd to pad out early career with so many bums



                    nope.....

                    I think that the MANY losses, some by KO... taint Pac's career

                    only in La-La land... and in Pacquiao-Land... do losses not count

                    Mayweather has better wins than Pacquiao, and NO losses

                    Mayweather > Pacquiao, it is... NOT..... EVEN..... CLOSE !!

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
                      nope.....

                      I think that the MANY losses, some by KO... taint Pac's career

                      only in La-La land... and in Pacquiao-Land... do losses not count

                      Mayweather has better wins than Pacquiao, and NO losses

                      Mayweather > Pacquiao, it is... NOT..... EVEN..... CLOSE !!
                      You don't sound very convinced. People who don't sound gentlemanly are never convincing. Your as convincing as Calzaghe fans saying Calzaghe has better wins than bh. But you don't find Calzaghe fans acting as unreasonable as floyd fans. Floyd fans are pompous and love sound of own voices
                      Last edited by hugh grant; 08-04-2019, 07:26 PM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP