Max Kellerman: Manny Pacquiao has a case for the best pound-for-pound fighter ever
Collapse
-
-
Michael Buffer announcing all of Manny “PacMan” Pacquiao’s achievements... what an introduction and what a legacy Manny will leave!#Boxing @MannyPacquiao @Michael_Buffer pic.twitter.com/iQdnAd62bo
— The Boxing Feed (@TheBoxingFeed) June 20, 2019
But 50-0 has been broken already by that thai minimum weight champ. That 50-0 record nearly broke by Wilder. Gilberto Ramirez is 10 fights away from being 50-0. Chocolatito almost had it. This all hapanned right after Floyd retired. And his legacy is already on question.
So, you can see being 50-0 is actually way easy than people thought it would be.Comment
-
I honestly don't see it happening any time soon. There are candidates out there like Inoue who could probably go up to featherweight, that would make him 5 divisions. But his power might dilute then. He has the same frame as Manny.
��Michael Buffer announcing all of Manny “PacMan” Pacquiao’s achievements... what an introduction and what a legacy Manny will leave!#Boxing @MannyPacquiao @Michael_Buffer pic.twitter.com/iQdnAd62bo
— The Boxing Feed (@TheBoxingFeed) June 20, 2019
But 50-0 has been broken already by that thai minimum weight champ. That 50-0 record nearly broke by Wilder. Gilberto Ramirez is 10 fights away from being 50-0. Chocolatito almost had it. This all hapanned right after Floyd retired. And his legacy is already on question.
So, you can see being 50-0 is actually way easy than people thought it would be.Comment
-
That was right after Floyd retired and someone legit almost beat his record. It was that easy.Comment
-
nobody ignored the largely-unproven mid-level welter, Thurman
he simply isn't that memorable
his best win is scraping past another mid-level guy, Shawn Porter..... and that was 3 years ago
only silly casual-fans think that the number of divisions you represented has anything to do with greatness
FACT: there are fighters greater than Pac, who only ever fought in 1 division
the number of divisions mean nothing
when you have to mention rubbish that is not genuine criteria for greatness..... rather than names, which is the ONLY genuine criteria for greatness..... then you know you lost
1) the divisions you refer to did not even exist back when many great fighters were campaigning..... so, WHO FKN CARES?
2) even if divisions were relevant, and they are not.....not even silly casual-fans think that Pac was ever a JMW, let alone a JMW champ..... Pac never fought and beat the best above 130, so mentioning those divisions is pointless..... and what about at featherweight, FACT: Manny never won a title at featherweight
people LITERALLY just give him a sympathy title at featherweight..... which is INSANE
it is literally insane to award a fighter a title that he did not win..... just because it makes a cool story bro
current era fools go lala over Pac..... future historians will not, they will keep it real..... all of the usual nonsense that happens before/after every Pac fight will not be remembered by historians..... they will look at names, nothing else, because they hype and nonsense will be all gone by then
who did you beat, with consideration given to when/how
that is all that matters
oh, how could I forget..... there is also some (not as much, but some) consideration given to..... LOSSES!!
FACT: there are fighters greater than Pac, who only ever fought in 1 division"
the number of divisions mean nothing and...
"who did you beat, with consideration given to when/how
that is all that matters"
wow, surely you still do not get what the p4p is all about....that's why you confuse it yourself with the issue of greatness...from the onset i made it clear that i deal with these topics separately...and also i made it clear that for me Ali is the goat....
you belittle the lower weight classes of today..i think you call them rubbish... and you are entitled to your opinion...
the fact that a filipino midget was able to do what others have not duplicated or surpass to date is widely heralded by boxing enthusiasts world wide...Comment
-
"only silly casual-fans think that the number of divisions you represented has anything to do with greatness
FACT: there are fighters greater than Pac, who only ever fought in 1 division"
the number of divisions mean nothing and...
"who did you beat, with consideration given to when/how
that is all that matters"
wow, surely you still do not get what the p4p is all about....that's why you confuse it yourself with the issue of greatness...from the onset i made it clear that i deal with these topics separately...and also i made it clear that for me Ali is the goat....
you belittle the lower weight classes of today..i think you call them rubbish... and you are entitled to your opinion...
the fact that a filipino midget was able to do what others have not duplicated or surpass to date is widely heralded by boxing enthusiasts world wide...
Pac is an excellent P4P fighter
same as MANY other fighters who are also NOT the greatest of all time
you just go, too far
keep it realComment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
tangalog, there is a reason why you just asked for names.....
because, names are the only things that matter... right ?
so, give me 3 names on Pac's resume who are better than.....
defusing Pacquiao, at 38yo
schooling Canelo, at 36yo
schooling Marquez, at 32yo
go..... !!
tell you what, I will give you a chance..... just give me 1 win on Pac's resume that is better than any 1 of those wins on Mayweathers resume..... just one name.....
you are on the ropes nowComment
Comment