Comments Thread For: Hearn Backs Whyte, But Admits He Should Be Banned if Guilty

[SchoolTheseCats]

Hearn admits in the ifl interview also that the test was conducted a month prior and results coming back 3 days before fight took place.... should not take a month to get results back from any testing agency with technology Available today

[texasboi15]

Eddie “Lucifer” Hearn needs to be booted out of boxing for good....that is after he “takes over American boxing” like all the little British casual nerds were claiming yesteryear

BWaHaahaHA!!

[Eff Pandas]

Its fine....just a lil bit of anabolic steroids fell into Whyte's lunch one day. I can't count all the times I ingested anabolic steroids on accident. I mean if I had a penny for every time that happened....I'd be rich.

[BoloShot]

We’ve heard his tired mantra for weeks - as if Whyte is the only guy who’s waited long because sanctioning bodies are bent. And Hearn was ****ily spewing this propaganda in the ring after the Rivas fight when he knew his guy came up dirty. Obnoxious con man. Only a total Wilder hater or Hearn suckler thinks Whyte could beat Wilder. Wilder’s resume is meh but if Rivas and Parker put Whyte down, Wilder would put him in a body cast

Thing is Whyte is still skilled and Wilder's chin is not as good as Parker's or Rivas' by any means. So why would you buy into nonsense claiming that you have to be a Hearn suckled or Wilder hater to call a Wilder loss on that fight.

[uppercut510]

This is not a good look all the way around for hearn, the uk, or whyte

[STREET CLEANER]

Its fine....just a lil bit of anabolic steroids fell into Whyte's lunch one day. I can't count all the times I ingested anabolic steroids on accident. I mean if I had a penny for every time that happened....I'd be rich.

LOL, that steroid happen to fall on his food the day before the testing. What are the odds?

[Loque-san]

Hearn is probably spending his days making phone calls, ready to spend absurd amounts of cash to get his hands on Whyte's B-sample.

[Alan Smithee]

Its fine....just a lil bit of anabolic steroids fell into Whyte's lunch one day. I can't count all the times I ingested anabolic steroids on accident. I mean if I had a penny for every time that happened....I'd be rich.

lol and even if he is claiming a tainted supplement then he should have cleared them with the testing agencies first. There are several unscrupulous companies with shoddy practices who have been cited and sued. Ask before taking! Deontay Wilder claims to contact Dr. Margaret Goodman (head of VADA) before taking any supplemements. Below is a link about unsavory supplement suppliers:

https://www.sportsintegrityinitiative.com/3-supplement-manufacturers-charged-in-criminal-cases/

[Gentblue]

Why am I thinking of Manuel Charr all of a sudden.......didn’t he come up dirty but they messed up his B sample by delaying it or something and even thought he was caught dead to rights got off due to a technicality..... is that what this delay is for?


Edit: found it

According to the WBA resolution, “WADA’s rules provide that an athlete has the right to be notified of “the scheduled date, time and place for the B-Sample analysis...” “Doping Control”, Part 1, section 7.3.

They also provide that an athlete must be provided notice of “the opportunity for the Athlete and/or the Athlete’s representative to attend the B Sample opening and analysis...” Section 7.3e.
“The second sample opening and testing was presumably conducted at a WADA-approved laboratory. There is no evidence that the laboratory separately informed Charr or his representative of the place, date, and time for opening and testing of the second sample. Neither VADA nor the WBA has adopted the WADA protocols or rules except for the prohibited substances list.”
Charr’s appeal of the WBA ruling was filed under these grounds, along with proof of a clean test result conducted by VADA on September 29, the day of the scheduled fight.


Given the lapse in testing between the “A” and “B” samples of the original test, the WBA had no choice but to rule in favor of reinstating him as the “regular” champ. The official ruling was rendered final on December 18, with the sanctioning body notifying all parties affected—all involved in the still-to-be-rescheduled Charr vs. Oquendo clash, along with interim titlist Trevor Bryan and top contender Jarrell “Big Baby” Miller.

https://www.boxingscene.com/charr-wins-appeal-reinstated-wba-titlist-box-off-follow--135605

Does the WBC have this rule also??

[Alan Smithee]

Thing is Whyte is still skilled and Wilder's chin is not as good as Parker's or Rivas' by any means. So why would you buy into nonsense claiming that you have to be a Hearn suckled or Wilder hater to call a Wilder loss on that fight.

Whyte does have some skills. A terrific left hook and decent jab. The problem is that he is easy to hit and his chin is certainly not steel either. Wilder at 6' 7" is quicker and it would be very difficult for that left hook to reach his body because getting inside leaves you open to one of the better right hands in recent years. Whyte's one chance would be that sweet left hook to the jaw but easier said than done!