NSAC vs. UKAD

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ShaneMosleySr
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Mar 2019
    • 10325
    • 1,049
    • 903
    • 276,311

    #1

    NSAC vs. UKAD

    The Nevada State Athletic Commission refused to license Canelo Alvarez over a failed drug test and suspended him. By doing so, they destroyed the biggest fight of the year on the biggest fight weekend of the year.

    UKAD couldn’t even be bothered to suspend Dillian Whyte for the Oscar Rivas fight.

    Why does everyone is England think UKAD is on the up and up while state athletic commissions in the US aren’t?
  • deathofaclown
    Undisputed Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Apr 2015
    • 16319
    • 3,918
    • 50
    • 98,604

    #2
    UKAD are just the testing agency. Why can’t people grasp this?

    Your real argument needs to be BBBoC v NSAC.

    Anyway i think BBBoC and their process of not stopping a fighter fighting until the process is completed is ****** and it’s a disgrace when they don’t inform the other fighter and their team.

    The good thing about BBBoC is that they actually hand out lengthy bans when they do ban fighters, usually 2 years. 6 month bans are nonsense. Canelo just squeezed another fight in at the end of the year and still got his 2 paydays, so the ban was useless.
    Last edited by deathofaclown; 07-30-2019, 12:07 PM.

    Comment

    Working...
    TOP