I'm calling it now. Whyte will be cleared.

[lolpz]

You do know hair can be drug tested right?

Was he supposed to
have every hair follicle from his scalp surgically removed after testing positive or something?

Even bald people have hair.

[P4P Forever]

1 drug was found. A steroid that needs to be taken consistently for weeks to be useful. If he was doing that VADA would have found it, or VADA is useless.

You your self are saying one drug was found. Right. So you agree there is a 0 tolerance policy in place for the one drug found. Right end of story.

Cmon Robbie why was it there? Are you backing this or just saying they will white wash the whole mess??? Just trying to understand where your coming from. I guessing you would not want to be in Rivas position in this one.

[Biolink]

I could see it being a rare case of cross contamination taking in all the evidence and the timeline, but isn't his innocence staked on the B-sample coming back clean?

Either way it goes just like in the Clenelo situation WADA says the athlete is responsible for what's in their body regardless of the circumstances. I can't see this ending well for Whyte if that's the case, unless miraculously the B-sample comes back good. Even then his path looks bleak. And we haven't even gotten into the civil lawsuit territory which I'm sure Rivas' team will exercise at some point.

[Left Hook Tua]

He's got the VADA tests as evidence. He's also kept his hair for a reason, that will be tested too. Someone guilty would be shaving that **** off and disposing of it. He will be cleared. Of course people with no common sense will cry corruption, but who cares about fools like that anyway?

Get off his ****, fecking mong

[Left Hook Tua]

A lot of guys here **** ride Pacquiao, Mayweather

Older greats like Chavez, Ali, Trinidad, Tyson, etc

This aussie ***** is white knighting dillian whyte

Lmfao

[LetOutTheCage]

Only thing here is he could face minor penalty for unknowingly taking a tampered product which still may get him banned for a short time which is ****** but its in the rules or within the rules. hope hes cleared I would like to see the idots who went on the attack in the media including Mr. Hauser lawyer supreme . lol

I guess it depends, if the supplements were originally cleared by UKAD, VADA and it was later found that it had been tampered with or ingredients changed/hidden then he is well within his right to dispute any potential punishment. In fact he should look to take legal action if this is indeed the case.

Time will tell if he is innocent or not, if he is then I expect all these US posters to apologise for already deciding he is guilty and making multiple posts/threads accusing him and UK boxing in general of cheating

[_Maxi]

Robbie keeps showing he's ******ed. Ultra trace amounts? the **** do you know? weren't it just rumours? him passing VADA has nothing to do, since testing is not perfect. It could be a timing problem.

[Alan Smithee]

He's got the VADA tests as evidence. He's also kept his hair for a reason, that will be tested too. Someone guilty would be shaving that **** off and disposing of it. He will be cleared. Of course people with no common sense will cry corruption, but who cares about fools like that anyway?

Typical Barrett response! Shaving his hair? His entire body?


Body hair drug testing is usually performed when head hair testing cannot occur due to a lack of sufficient head hair or in cases where a history of use is suspected, but the approximate time of use isn't known or isn't important.

Unlike head hair testing, body hair drug testing does not have a hair length requirement, only a volume requirement. In general, a viable body hair sample is about the size of a large cotton ball (approximately 1 inch in diameter when bunched). If a donor is not able to provide enough of a hair sample, nail testing may be an option.

Body hair drug testing has been used successfully in legal proceedings.


Hey Barrett do you ever have a clue? As far as Whyte it all depends on the UKAD "B" sample. Passing a VADA test on the 15th doesn't necessarily clear him if he failed a UKAD test on the 17th. Whether he is cleared or not there is more to this story! D-ball and also the changing of the gloves. British heavyweights need every advantage that they can find. The skill just isn't there!

[Alan Smithee]

Only thing here is he could face minor penalty for unknowingly taking a tampered product which still may get him banned for a short time which is ****** but its in the rules or within the rules. hope hes cleared I would like to see the idots who went on the attack in the media including Mr. Hauser lawyer supreme . lol

Idiots who went on the attack? His "A" sample came up positive for Dianabol metabolites. The amount is irrelevant. The "B" sample will provide more clarity. How about the changing of the gloves? What is the deal with that? Unfair advantage?

https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/boxing/oscar-rivas-lodged-appeal-before-18776478

The complaint was made before the fight so it is not sour g****s. Figures that you would defend Whyte! Typical!

[Alan Smithee]

Was he supposed to
have every hair follicle from his scalp surgically removed after testing positive or something?

Even bald people have hair.

What do you expect from Robbie Barrett (know it all who know's little). Shave his head,lol! What a clown!