Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

So Manny beats the No.1 WW and.....

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #71
    Losses to Jeff horn, floyd, marquez, Bradley 2,4,7 years ago doesn't matter

    Wins over cotto, clottey 9-10 years ago do




    Dont forget ray Leonard's run in the 1980s

    Put sugar gay #1 at ww

    Comment


    • #72
      Originally posted by Boxing Goat View Post
      .....He is ranked 3rd by The Ring mag! lol

      How is it that he beats a better, higher ranked fighter than either Crawford or Spence ever have at WW but they are ranked ahead of him? I don't think so.

      Let's examine Spence's best 3 WW wins.....

      1) Brook, who was shot after the GGG fight and did little before that really.
      2) Garcia, who had never even fought WW and was a dwarf compared to Spence.
      3) Lamont Peterson.....do I even need to mention him?

      Mediocre at best.

      Ok, now Crawford's....

      1) Horn, who Manny already beat.
      2) Khan, who is old news trash, easy to hit with a China chin.
      3) Benavidez......who? Has zero good wins.

      So he's done very, very little at WW.

      Now, let's examine Manny's last 3....

      1) Thurman.....No.1 WW, the rest is self explanatory.
      2) Broner, who on any given day can be a WW titlist and had drew with Jessie Vargas in his previous fight.
      3) Mattysse ...world champ with an obvious reputation.

      Now, who really deserves to be the #1 WW?

      It's Manny and there's no denying that in my mind.
      If you have another opinion on it, let's discuss civilly. Thanks.


      Keith Thurman wasnt the number one welterweight you reject

      Comment


      • #73
        Originally posted by Left Hook Tua View Post
        Losses to Jeff horn, floyd, marquez, Bradley 2,4,7 years ago doesn't matter

        Wins over cotto, clottey 9-10 years ago do




        Dont forget ray Leonard's run in the 1980s

        Put sugar gay #1 at ww
        Yeah, a loss to Bradley and Horn never happened and he just beat Thurman. Don't be dumb......if you can help it, of course.

        Comment


        • #74
          Originally posted by el*** View Post
          Keith Thurman wasnt the number one welterweight you reject
          He was prior to his injury and nothing anyone else has done has proven that anyone else is better, aside from Manny. Spence and Crawford's records at WW are garbage.

          Nice screen name. Fitting for you

          Comment


          • #75
            Originally posted by Boxing Goat View Post
            Yeah, a loss to Bradley and Horn never happened and he just beat Thurman. Don't be dumb......if you can help it, of course.
            Uh huh

            You're complaining about the opinions of ppl that follow boxing for a living

            They've forgotten more fights than your ask has even seen highlights off

            Rankings are just opinions

            Opinions from boxing ppl who know a lot more than your dumbass

            Deal with it, crybaby

            Comment


            • #76
              Manny is 41 yrs old

              And this idiot wants to rank him like its 2008

              Comment


              • #77
                Originally posted by el*** View Post
                Keith Thurman wasnt the number one welterweight you reject
                His argument is Keith Thurman was #1 3 yrs ago

                Comment


                • #78
                  Originally posted by Left Hook Tua View Post
                  I think the govt passed a law that says if u have a loss on your record to Jeff horn, you can never be ranked #1 in that division ever again

                  Comment


                  • #79
                    Originally posted by Left Hook Tua View Post
                    Arent most rankings based on opinion?

                    Unless you have a computer ranking like boxrec or something.

                    And those are even more wrong than opinion based rankings.
                    my bad...i was not so clear cut on my earlier post..

                    what i really mean is that opinions of those responsible for the ranking must be fights results oriented...based on concluded fights....rather than on their opinions on WHO would win in a possible match up...say between pac vs spence or pac vs crawford....i can't recall how many in NSB call that kind of fight....i just can't fathom why rankings have to be based not on results of actual fights but on imagined outcome of what if fights...

                    Comment


                    • #80
                      Originally posted by Left Hook Tua View Post
                      Uh huh

                      You're complaining about the opinions of ppl that follow boxing for a living

                      They've forgotten more fights than your ask has even seen highlights off

                      Rankings are just opinions

                      Opinions from boxing ppl who know a lot more than your dumbass

                      Deal with it, crybaby
                      I can guarantee that I've followed boxing longer, watched more fights and know more about this sport than you or anyone else you know. Of course its just my opinion. Wtf do you think any of us are here for ya fkn moron? The difference is that i have FACTS that support my opinion! I've stated them many times in my thread. And also, Manny is in FACT ranked ahead of Crawford in the ESPN rankings, which is also a panel of boxing experts. mr. genius.
                      Now, go fck yourself you disrespectful c@nt

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP