Whyte still has options, right?

[juggernaut666]

No sir it would not be defamation of character. That is the legal term for slandering a person verbally.
Lible is the term used for slandering a person in print.

Heres another mistake you made looking this up, being libel doesn't have to be in print if a third person is involved if words are exchanged which is the one who the accusations are aimed at. What you're posting is clearly false .

[juggernaut666]

No sense in arguing with you on this.
Just like your comments on the Ruiz breach of contract. You have your opinion we will leave it as such.
Have a good night

Yea whatever kid ,keep pretending to be a lawyer, im sure the dopes will fall for it. ..just remember Libel and slander are both types of defamation it doesn't have to be VERBAL, SIR.lol

[daggum]

pbc and wilder paid off the testers. this is so obvious. dont pretend like they wouldn't. this is a muti million almost billion dollar operation here. there are no rules

[Oldpops]

Yea whatever kid ,keep pretending to be a lawyer, im sure the dopes will fall for it. ...lol

I never said I was a lawyer. I said i studied law. Reading is fundamental.
I dropped out and went into pharmaceutical sales.
But I stand by all I've stated

[juggernaut666]

I never said I was a lawyer. I said i studied law. Reading is fundamental.
I dropped out and went into pharmaceutical sales.
But I stand by all I've stated

Yea that's not hard to believe I can see why, as you don't understand lible and slander are both types of Defimation of character. If you don't understand this that written documents of any kind is easier to prove defimation as opposed to verbal I really would be curious about your grades in law ? lol

[juggernaut666]

Slander = verbal.
Libel = written.

At least historically and in my country, as per first year law.

Also generally you don't need to prove the accusations to be false for it to be libelous, just harmful to reputation and made with malice or negligence, although true is generally an absolute defense.

Both are forms of defamation of character but that knuckle head alt ( whoever that is ) who claims to study law thinks defamation is only verbal this is what he said . This is the problem with ppl pretending to know what theyre talking about. Defamation of character is easier to prove when written .

At least he didn't say DEFORMATION ,I actually had posters like him telling me DEFORMATION. lol

[MusoMeanderings]

There should be a separate WBSS tournament for proven PED cheats with no testing.

[LetOutTheCage]

Two time steroid cheat and complaints about his gloves, of course ***** tit juggernaut is on the “conspiracy” bandwagon. Foil hat covers his bald spot better than his greasy combover does.

Whyte is finished in competitive boxing if these stories are proven accurate

If they are proven accurate then he should be banned for life, the recent deaths of two fighters should highlight to everyone that boxing is not a game and there are consequences. Lets see what the results of the B sample first are

[Dontbeahater]

Both are forms of defamation of character but that knuckle head alt ( whoever that is ) who claims to study law thinks defamation is only verbal this is what he said . This is the problem with ppl pretending to know what theyre talking about. Defamation of character is easier to prove when written .

At least he didn't say DEFORMATION ,I actually had posters like him telling me DEFORMATION. lol

Why should we believe you? Do you have credentials or experience?

Are you speaking of UK libel laws or US laws which are different?
No one knows since you are passing off your non professional opinion as facts.

[Dontbeahater]

Both are forms of defamation of character but that knuckle head alt ( whoever that is ) who claims to study law thinks defamation is only verbal this is what he said . This is the problem with ppl pretending to know what theyre talking about. Defamation of character is easier to prove when written .

At least he didn't say DEFORMATION ,I actually had posters like him telling me DEFORMATION. lol

slander. n. oral defamation, in which someone tells one or more persons an untruth about another, which untruth will harm the reputation of the person defamed. Slander is a civil wrong (tort) and can be the basis for a lawsuit

I wouldn't say anything but you are trolling so hard that I have to educate you. Who cares what your fake legal opinion is.
Take this L and move on. You don't know what you're talking about and that's ok. It's classic dunning-Kruger here.

When you realize you don't know what that means then get mad and get emotional, just remember you didn't know the difference between slander and libel or how it relates to defamation... Instead you repeatedly attacked someone trying to educate you with facts... Don't go out and troll more people up now because you are raging.