So Whyte has been doing VADA for years and they never caught him?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Robbie Barrett
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Nov 2013
    • 40891
    • 2,779
    • 667
    • 570,921

    #31
    Originally posted by Zaryu
    Does this really mean VADA sucks? VADA has caught many cheaters before. I don't think any one drug testing organization can catch every cheater every single time. It's random drug testing after all, not daily drug testing.
    They failed to detect a drug that stays in a persons system for 19 days. That's pretty bad when they were being paid to to do advanced testing during a fighters training camp.

    Comment

    • Zaryu
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Nov 2010
      • 3087
      • 177
      • 426
      • 31,274

      #32
      Originally posted by Robbie Barrett
      They failed to detect a drug that stays in a persons system for 19 days. That's pretty bad when they were being paid to to do advanced testing during a fighters training camp.
      Well, it sounds like something they should have caught. I wonder if they didn't test enough and missed the window or if it passed undetected through their system.

      Comment

      • ShaneMosleySr
        Banned
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Mar 2019
        • 10325
        • 1,049
        • 903
        • 276,311

        #33
        First Dillian Whyte was the victim of a smear job.

        But now that we know he’s not, let’s make this about VADA and testing in the United States.

        Comment

        • thesmokingman
          Contender
          Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
          • Jul 2014
          • 379
          • 18
          • 33
          • 13,655

          #34
          Originally posted by Robbie Barrett
          They failed to detect a drug that stays in a persons system for 19 days. That's pretty bad when they were being paid to to do advanced testing during a fighters training camp.
          Wrong, but that's no surprise. Both long and short metabolites were found. That means the dude literally popped a pill days before test.

          "The primary urinary metabolites are detectable for up to 3 days, and a recently discovered hydroxymethyl metabolite is found in urine for up to 19 days after a single 5 mg oral dose."

          Comment

          • Robbie Barrett
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Nov 2013
            • 40891
            • 2,779
            • 667
            • 570,921

            #35
            Originally posted by thesmokingman
            Wrong, but that's no surprise. Both long and short metabolites were found. That means the dude literally popped a pill days before test.

            "The primary urinary metabolites are detectable for up to 3 days, and a recently discovered hydroxymethyl metabolite is found in urine for up to 19 days after a single 5 mg oral dose."
            1 pill? That's your story? You think people cycle with 1 single pill? If he was cycling he was on it for weeks.

            Comment

            • thesmokingman
              Contender
              Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
              • Jul 2014
              • 379
              • 18
              • 33
              • 13,655

              #36
              Originally posted by Robbie Barrett
              1 pill? That's your story? You think people cycle with 1 single pill? If he was cycling he was on it for weeks.
              Why don't you go troll and whine to UKAD?

              Comment

              • Robbie Barrett
                Banned
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Nov 2013
                • 40891
                • 2,779
                • 667
                • 570,921

                #37
                Originally posted by thesmokingman
                Why don't you go troll and whine to UKAD?
                UKAD wasn't being paid to their advanced and stringent testing, VADA was. UKAD was just doing their standard testing.

                Comment

                • BobLoblaw
                  Interim Champion
                  Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                  • Jun 2017
                  • 727
                  • 40
                  • 33
                  • 15,921

                  #38
                  When is the B Sample being released?

                  Comment

                  • MastaBlasta
                    Undisputed Champion
                    • Jul 2017
                    • 1856
                    • 236
                    • 328
                    • 36,075

                    #39
                    Originally posted by Robbie Barrett
                    They actually check the other samples etc before ruining a athletes career. They don't release names either until they're proven guilty, someone must have leaked it.

                    In America they have no mandatory testing and the voluntary VADA isn't looking so great now is it?
                    VADA does do random testing also. A note from an article when Miller was caught: In a twist worthy of Hercule Poirot, ESPN reports Jarrell Miller has tested positive for the performance-enhancing substance GW1516 ahead of his June 1st bout with Anthony Joshua. The positive result came from a random VADA test on March 20th."

                    - https://www.badlefthook.com/2019/4/1...ails-drug-test

                    As usual you are either sadly misinformed or lying or both.

                    Regardless: ALL TESTING IS GOOD. Because an athlete passes one test does not guarantee they will pass the next ... and vice versa. More testing is better for this reason. VADA, UKAD, etc tests can miss or catch cheating at any time. Because an athlete didn't get caught doesn't invalidate the testing.

                    Also, athletes can only be caught when PEDS are in their system. Whyte may have been clean when VADA testing was done Test were administered at different times. If tests were administered at the same time you might have the 1st step of an argument of which test were better/more accurate. Even then there are lots of variables.

                    Bottom line, Whyte is caught, again. Because he had passed ANYONES tests in the past means nothing in relation to the testing done THAT DAY.

                    Comment

                    • thesmokingman
                      Contender
                      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                      • Jul 2014
                      • 379
                      • 18
                      • 33
                      • 13,655

                      #40
                      Originally posted by Robbie Barrett
                      UKAD wasn't being paid to their advanced and stringent testing, VADA was. UKAD was just doing their standard testing.
                      Sorry, did I ask you that? Again, why aren't you whining like a biotch about UKAD?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP