So Whyte has been doing VADA for years and they never caught him?
Collapse
-
-
Well, it sounds like something they should have caught. I wonder if they didn't test enough and missed the window or if it passed undetected through their system.Comment
-
First Dillian Whyte was the victim of a smear job.
But now that we know he’s not, let’s make this about VADA and testing in the United States.Comment
-
Wrong, but that's no surprise. Both long and short metabolites were found. That means the dude literally popped a pill days before test.
"The primary urinary metabolites are detectable for up to 3 days, and a recently discovered hydroxymethyl metabolite is found in urine for up to 19 days after a single 5 mg oral dose."Comment
-
1 pill? That's your story? You think people cycle with 1 single pill? If he was cycling he was on it for weeks.Wrong, but that's no surprise. Both long and short metabolites were found. That means the dude literally popped a pill days before test.
"The primary urinary metabolites are detectable for up to 3 days, and a recently discovered hydroxymethyl metabolite is found in urine for up to 19 days after a single 5 mg oral dose."
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
VADA does do random testing also. A note from an article when Miller was caught: In a twist worthy of Hercule Poirot, ESPN reports Jarrell Miller has tested positive for the performance-enhancing substance GW1516 ahead of his June 1st bout with Anthony Joshua. The positive result came from a random VADA test on March 20th."They actually check the other samples etc before ruining a athletes career. They don't release names either until they're proven guilty, someone must have leaked it.
In America they have no mandatory testing and the voluntary VADA isn't looking so great now is it?
- https://www.badlefthook.com/2019/4/1...ails-drug-test
As usual you are either sadly misinformed or lying or both.
Regardless: ALL TESTING IS GOOD. Because an athlete passes one test does not guarantee they will pass the next ... and vice versa. More testing is better for this reason. VADA, UKAD, etc tests can miss or catch cheating at any time. Because an athlete didn't get caught doesn't invalidate the testing.
Also, athletes can only be caught when PEDS are in their system. Whyte may have been clean when VADA testing was done Test were administered at different times. If tests were administered at the same time you might have the 1st step of an argument of which test were better/more accurate. Even then there are lots of variables.
Bottom line, Whyte is caught, again. Because he had passed ANYONES tests in the past means nothing in relation to the testing done THAT DAY.Comment
-
Comment
Comment