Is the WBA the Worst and most greedy organization out of the big 4?

[cupocity303]

Jesus Effin' Christ, I just scrolled through the list of Title holders in each division on ESPN:

https://www.espn.com/boxing/story/_/...champions-list

They literally got a Interim and Regular Champ at the same time in almost every division. The WBA Champ doesn't even need to fight the other organization's belt holders to unify. The WBA could hold their own tournament just to have a Undisputed WBA Champion.

[vaynardevil]

maybe WBC could rival from the way they ****** canelo's **** recently

[aboutfkntime]

Jesus Effin' Christ, I just scrolled through the list of Title holders in each division on ESPN:

https://www.espn.com/boxing/story/_/...champions-list

They literally got a Interim and Regular Champ at the same time in almost every division. The WBA Champ doesn't even need to fight the other organization's belt holders to unify. The WBA could hold their own tournament just to have a Undisputed WBA Champion.

so, we currently have 85 world champions..... ?

amazing

wait.....

The Ring " belt ".....

so, we now have 102 world..... " champions "

let's face it, it is sooooo much easier to win a belt these days

they can - and have - LITERALLY given those fkn things away

these are my rankings at welter.....

1) Crawford..... NOT based on " achievement ", based on..... who I think would win between him and Spence

2) Spence

3) Pacquiao

4) Porter..... same as above, I think he beats Thurman now

5) Thurman..... I will give him the benefit of the doubt over Danny Garcia, but not a hundred percent sure

despite the fact that Thurman is not one of the top welters, and may no longer even be a genuine top 5..... Hugh Grant is on the other thread insisting that Pacquiao is greater than Robinson, Armstrong, Leonard, and Mayweather..... because they never won a welterweight title at 40yo, despite the fact that most of the shltty "titles" today, did not even exist back when those legends were doing their thing

the sloppy standards within the ABC bodies have eroded the standards within boxing..... and fans are buying it, if it benefits their guy

we saw the same thing when Golovkin fans happily approved Gennady equaling Hopkins record for middleweight defences, despite only defending a junior title that did not even exist back when Hopkins was doing his thing

it has been clearly obvious for DECADES, that the ABC organisations are the worst thing for boxing..... that is why our sport is so fragmented and has so many undecipherable problems

TV networks are the second worst..... they are just cancer

then promoters