I never realised Crawford's reach is 74'

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Brz_Pugilist
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • May 2005
    • 1242
    • 94
    • 1
    • 9,559

    #11
    Reach is overrated in my opinion. Gamboa had a 65 reach was still able to get inside crawford’s reach advantage.

    Comment

    • elfag
      Alpha fäggot
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Jan 2008
      • 15617
      • 3,487
      • 302
      • 65,929

      #12
      Originally posted by GrandpaBernard
      I think it's a typo error

      All Crawford's tales of the tape list his reach at 70"


      That makes more sense.

      McGreggor had 74" reach, Crawfords arms dont seem as long as mcgreggors.

      Comment

      • South Champion
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • May 2018
        • 1370
        • 102
        • 3
        • 75,497

        #13
        Originally posted by travestyny
        I just mentioned the same thing today. 2" more than Mayweather and Spence. Crazy.
        5' 9"
        Kell Brook: 69" reach
        Yordenis Ugas: 69" reach
        Jeff Horn: 68"reach

        5' 8"
        Amir Khan: 71" reach
        Danny Garcia: 68" reach

        5' 7"
        Keith Thurman: 69" reach

        5' 6"
        Porter: 69" reach
        Mikey Garcia: 68" reach
        Pacquiao: 67" reach

        Comment

        • elfag
          Alpha fäggot
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Jan 2008
          • 15617
          • 3,487
          • 302
          • 65,929

          #14
          Originally posted by Brz_Pugilist
          Reach is overrated in my opinion. Gamboa had a 65 reach was still able to get inside crawford’s reach advantage.

          It varies but it is a definite advantage or even necessity for an outside fighter.

          Fury with his height and reach almost no heavy can even find his head.

          Sure some guys with T rex arms like Hatton and Tyson were effective but a long reach is almost always a big advantage. You can have a long reach and still have good inside game. Floyd, lennox and hopkins all had great inside and outside game and a long reach.

          Comment

          • KTFOKING
            Undisputed Champion
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Jun 2018
            • 14399
            • 1,266
            • 284
            • 344,781

            #15
            Originally posted by Brz_Pugilist
            Reach is overrated in my opinion. Gamboa had a 65 reach was still able to get inside crawford’s reach advantage.
            It absolutely isn't overrated. I mean can you get inside a longer reach? That goes without saying, but a fighter with Crawford's type of skill set can dictate the entire fight with his arm length/reach. He can keep you at bay and just pick you off.

            Gamboa had quicker hands than Crawford but after the 4th round, proceeded to get his a$$ whooped.

            Comment

            • boxinggod101
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Apr 2012
              • 7404
              • 352
              • 413
              • 70,840

              #16
              This guy should leave Arum. He will waste his prime years fighting nobodies. He has the skill to beat everyone at WW. He's now what? 31? His resume is sh#tty for a top P4P fighter with that kind of skills.

              Comment

              • spenz
                Contender
                Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                • Feb 2012
                • 472
                • 11
                • 0
                • 20,102

                #17
                That is a hell of an asset if a fighter can utilize it well.

                Comment

                • GrandpaBernard
                  Banned
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • May 2010
                  • 17156
                  • 4,480
                  • 2,947
                  • 114,399

                  #18
                  Originally posted by el***
                  That makes more sense.

                  McGreggor had 74" reach, Crawfords arms dont seem as long as mcgreggors.
                  exactly

                  Originally posted by el***
                  It varies but it is a definite advantage or even necessity for an outside fighter.

                  Fury with his height and reach almost no heavy can even find his head.

                  Sure some guys with T rex arms like Hatton and Tyson were effective but a long reach is almost always a big advantage. You can have a long reach and still have good inside game. Floyd, lennox and hopkins all had great inside and outside game and a long reach.
                  yep I rather have long arms and learn how to fight inside than t-rex arms learning how to box outside

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  TOP