No matter how you look at it floyd is above manny.

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • siablo14
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jan 2006
    • 39348
    • 2,604
    • 12,396
    • 2,257,607

    #41
    Originally posted by Szef
    Not at the age pac is he wouldnt

    he looked shot to **** vs mcgregor
    Red - Floyd wasn't taking that fight serious.

    Comment

    • daggum
      All time great
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Feb 2008
      • 43562
      • 4,589
      • 3
      • 166,270

      #42
      pac landed the much cleaner punches and beat floyd. you didnt pay attention when watching the fight. its already been analyzed to death but stay ignorant. its for your own mental stability. you would never want to admit what really happened. you cant

      Comment

      • BoloShot
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • May 2019
        • 2786
        • 119
        • 391
        • 56,635

        #43
        Originally posted by The tucker
        Most the men you named that he beat more convincingly was either coming off a loss or has looked bad coming into the fight with manny. Floyd fought delahoya at his rules and weight. Fought a undefeated hatton and mosley after destroying margarito.

        Manny got them after they lost to floyd or didn’t look good in there previous fight.

        And if floyd fought the likes of a Jeff horn or Chris algirie he would get crucified.
        I don't see how there's much of a difference between Algieri and Horn and say a Victor Ortiz and Andre Berto. Mosley and Cotto were faded for both men, but beaten worse by Pac. Mayweather didn't fight Hatton at his weight, Pac did and knocked him out so sweetly. Marquez is Floyd's best win IMO, his fight against De La Hoya was close, not a dominant Floyd for certain. In fact he rarely dominated top fighters. Maidana made him struggle badly the first time out. Guerrero was an alright win in fairness. He has a very good resumé does Floyd, but its not as good.

        Comment

        • daggum
          All time great
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Feb 2008
          • 43562
          • 4,589
          • 3
          • 166,270

          #44
          Originally posted by Godsfly
          On all time rankings manny will never ever be higher then floyd. Those who are bringing up lomata to robinson or louis to Marciano it's not the same as floyd pac. Marciano and lomata had critically critically weak resumes in comparison to Robinson and louis. Very weak by comparison. Mayweather and pac had almost a tic for tact resume with pac edging it. The problem is both fought and pac won no more then 3 rounds.....with such close resumes that catapulted mayweather far ahead of manny in greatness perspective. Manny would have to beat Crawfords Spence's guys like that.
          really now? please tell me the 7 rounds floyd clearly won and we can analyze them. clean punch for clean punch. you didnt pay attention to the fight. at all. i can understand someone who just took a broad view of the fight thinking floyd just edged it but to say he won it that clearly is just absurd. just because it was a boring slow fight doesnt mean floyd was winning it. its called clean punching and one guy was getting his head smashed around and it wasnt pac. oh no watch out for that lil grazing jab from floyd! i guess he wins the round!

          Comment

          • Left Hook Tua
            VATNIK
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Apr 2008
            • 62306
            • 7,010
            • 1,581
            • 951,318

            #45
            Floyd has nothing in his career to match

            Barrera, Marquez, Morales

            Floyd wouldn't fight cotto or margarito

            Floyd has never come back from a loss or been a last minute replacement or scored an upset win in the champions country

            Greatness = manny

            Now if you wanna say floyd can beat manny head to head

            Sure the styles matchup favors floyd as do size

            But floyd doesn't have pacs balls

            Comment

            • The tucker
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Aug 2014
              • 2009
              • 435
              • 297
              • 33,113

              #46
              Originally posted by BoloShot
              I don't see how there's much of a difference between Algieri and Horn and say a Victor Ortiz and Andre Berto. Mosley and Cotto were faded for both men, but beaten worse by Pac. Mayweather didn't fight Hatton at his weight, Pac did and knocked him out so sweetly. Marquez is Floyd's best win IMO, his fight against De La Hoya was close, not a dominant Floyd for certain. In fact he rarely dominated top fighters. Maidana made him struggle badly the first time out. Guerrero was an alright win in fairness. He has a very good resumé does Floyd, but its not as good.
              There are major differences . NOBODY KNEW Jeff horn and was known for nothing before the fight with Pac. Ortiz had fight of the year and won a world title in beating the unbeaten berto before fighting Floyd. And algirie its best known for his back flips in the ring and beating ruslan.

              Manny fought the same guys coming off of losing streaks or they didn’t look good in the previous fight.

              Comment

              • Xi_
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Nov 2013
                • 3957
                • 193
                • 6
                • 13,179

                #47
                You morons are actually using this Thurman win as if it catapults Pacquiao over Floyd? Lmao. What a joke.

                Comment

                • EdWins
                  Winning
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Mar 2011
                  • 3808
                  • 179
                  • 94
                  • 63,466

                  #48
                  [QUOTE=deathofaclown;19920343]Do what? It was a very competitive fight with the right winner

                  FLoyd would almost shut out someone basic like Thurman

                  Anyway, If you wanna compare their careers then you could say Pac has had a better or more exciting career but Floyd was a still the better fighter anyway.[/QUOTE]

                  actually i would say its the other way around.

                  Floyd had the overall better career, he finished undefeated, rarely ever looked vulnerable

                  Pac tho has always been the better more exciting fighter that people actually pay to see whereas people pay to see floyd fights in hopes to see him lose.

                  Comment

                  • RetroSpeed05
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Mar 2014
                    • 4720
                    • 351
                    • 13
                    • 192,403

                    #49
                    Originally posted by The tucker
                    Who refused the drug test? And now feels 20 yers old at 40 with no vada testing lol.
                    Not to accuse anyone but its crazy how Pac got this reputation of a drug cheat when he never had rumors of failing any test he took.

                    Floyd had more circumstantial evidence of doping than Pac ever did.

                    Vampire facials, Illegal IV's, Making usada wait for a piss test for hours when they came for the Mosley fight, rumors that he failed 3 drug tests.

                    Also this

                    An example of what they might have found was uncovered by SB Nation in lab reports from the Nevada commission. Mayweather recorded abnormally low testosterone-to-epitestosterone ratios before two fights — the subtext: epitestosterone can be used to attempt to counterbalance performance-enhancing testosterone use before a test.)

                    Comment

                    • Slicc
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Oct 2017
                      • 1198
                      • 143
                      • 456
                      • 45,107

                      #50
                      Originally posted by hugh grant
                      What your basically saying is your a Floyd fanboy and there’s nothing pac can do to be greater! But fanboys like yourself aren’t realistic now are you?
                      People wanted the fight without cw but nobody was saying it was a historically great fight for Floyd as Floyd was beating a great champ. People thought it was too soon for nelo. Nelo was unknown so they fast tracked him to become known with ssm fight. Nelo only win of note was trout as he’d beaten cotto. But even trout was one hit wonder.
                      PACs always been above Floyd even when koed by jmm and losing to floyd. People may have naively thought otherwise. But that’s down to naivety
                      Let's not forget that it wasn't just a catchweight either. Floyd put a rehydration clause on top of the catchweight, so Canelo was drained af.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP