The sport of boxing disgusts me sometimes. They rather retire you and watch you laid on the canvas rather than have you retire with all your wits and brain cells intact. What an unscrupulous fanbase.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Ellerbe: Floyd's Very Content; No Interest In Pacquiao Rematch
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by hugh grant View PostPac should leave the Floyd rematch if Floyd don't want it. Its Floyds best win, but not a great win anyway because Pac was not the Pac tearing through people and not far removed from ko loss to JMM so was gun shy.
But the win for Floyd is not a decider historically for being greater than Pac, the win was full of controversy which hurts Floyd more than Pac.
Pac should just continue to beat the likes of Thurman who Floyd ducked. That will increase the distance between Pac and Floyd even more.
Lmao. I don’t even know what to say..
Comment
-
Originally posted by SkillspayBills View PostThe sport of boxing disgusts me sometimes. They rather retire you and watch you laid on the canvas rather than have you retire with all your wits and brain cells intact. What an unscrupulous fanbase.
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Big Dunn View PostI think you treat posters based on what they write.
IMO the Thurman win is a very good win and is great for Manny and the sport. Shows how great he is. Now if you get the slimy Manny fans that want to use this win to discredit Floyd, then give them the same as they give-don't give Manny any credit.
Truly sad that this board has so many disgraceful cretins that behave like Hugh Grant and diving hammer.
Comment
-
Originally posted by john l View PostOf course I treat poster's based on what they write if its something silly then yea I do. Also I do give Manny credit but beating an inactive and clearly not the same Thruman is not the same as beating Canelo at 36 while giving up 20+ pds its clearly a better win.
Thurman looked fine to me in the Pac fight so quit with the excuses. Nel o was green and it was a cw and not even that good back then he barely beat trout. He was untested and nobody knew who nel o was a year or so before floyd beat him.
Floyd fought with a cw, so you live by the sword you die by it. You can't expect the win to not be lessened. Floyd knew he'd be criticised but with Floyd its short term gain which is only what Floyd cares about, it helped him win but long term it's going to hurt you. Floyd mightve beat nel o without cw but we will never know now for sure but the thing is nel o wasn't prime then and has improved so much since anyway. So either way you can't make the win more than it was.
If Floyd didn't use cw the only critiscm people could use was nel o was green and inexperienced at highest level and not that good back then he's improved so much since. But Floyd makes it easy to criticise him. If your fighting a green fighters do you even need a cw?. It was Floyd so scared to lose unbeaten record and the unbeaten record is floyds selling point, what floyds fans use to promote idea how good Floyd is.
Pac s win over thurman is historically better than anything on floyds resume. History has seen much weaker ww champs than thurman was, yet no 40 something year old fighters have been able to take advantage of far weaker champs than thurman was. Not srr, not srl, they couldn't do what Pac did and they're natural WWs..
Perspective please. That's all anyone asks forLast edited by hugh grant; 07-24-2019, 02:35 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by hugh grant View PostPac s win over thurman is better than anything on floyds resume. What Pac did, no fighter in history has done.
Thurman looked fine to me in the Pac fight so quit with the excuses. Nel o was green and it was a cw and not even that good back then he barely beat trout. He was untested and nobody knew who nel o was a year or so before floyd beat him.
Floyd fought with a cw, so you live by the sword you die by it. You can't expect the win to not be lessened. Floyd knew he'd be criticised but with Floyd its short term gain which is only what Floyd cares about, it helped him win but long term it's going to hurt you. Floyd mightve beat nel o without cw but we will never know now for sure but the thing is nel o wasn't prime then and has improved so much since anyway. So either way you can't make the win more than it was.
If Floyd didn't use cw the only critiscm people could use was nel o was green and inexperienced at highest level and not that good back then he's improved so much since. But Floyd makes it easy to criticise him. If your fighting a green fighters do you even need a cw?. It was Floyd so scared to lose unbeaten record and the unbeaten record is floyds selling point, what floyds fans use to promote idea how good Floyd is.
Pac s win over thurman is historically better than anything on floyds resume. History has seen much weaker ww champs than thurman was, yet no 40 something year old fighters have been able to take advantage of far weaker champs than thurman was. Not srr, not srl, they couldn't do what Pac did and they're natural WWs..
Perspective please. That's all anyone asks for
Comment
Comment