Comments Thread For: Tyson Fury Names Jarrell Miller, Bryan Among Choices For October

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Roberto Vasquez
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jul 2013
    • 3996
    • 740
    • 139
    • 46,352

    #31
    Originally posted by SteveM
    If you say so. Fury bat Wilder in most people's eyes.
    Check the punches-landed statistics - was about 10 punches in it and Wilder knocked Fury down twice. Too many Fury fans chose not to see Wilder''s jabs that he was landing.

    Also the referee gave a long count - yes it's in the rules but it's not fair when other fighters don't get that long to get up.

    Comment

    • Adamsc151
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Sep 2018
      • 1520
      • 42
      • 47
      • 26,819

      #32
      Fury did plenty of time out of the ring after being busted for PED's, even if most of that time was mental health recovery. Miller's failed tests are still pretty fresh; ethically he shouldn't be fighting anyone until Spring 2020, and then not straight in against one of the top HW's. Put him in with Charles Martin or Dom Breazeale for his comeback, and make Fury-Bryan fight. Not seen much on Bryan, and intrigued as to whether he justifies a lofty ranking with the WBA.

      Comment

      • SteveM
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Feb 2015
        • 8300
        • 2,303
        • 1,212
        • 35,733

        #33
        Originally posted by Roberto Vasquez
        Check the punches-landed statistics - was about 10 punches in it and Wilder knocked Fury down twice. Too many Fury fans chose not to see Wilder''s jabs that he was landing.

        Also the referee gave a long count - yes it's in the rules but it's not fair when other fighters don't get that long to get up.
        its scored round by round and punches landed is not the only criteria. the kd.s were taken into account and most neutral judges had it 114-112 taking into account the kd.s.

        not fair to other fighters? whats that got to do with fury/wilder? you yourself said it's in the rules and so it is

        Comment

        • Roberto Vasquez
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jul 2013
          • 3996
          • 740
          • 139
          • 46,352

          #34
          Originally posted by SteveM
          its scored round by round and punches landed is not the only criteria. the kd.s were taken into account and most neutral judges had it 114-112 taking into account the kd.s.

          not fair to other fighters? whats that got to do with fury/wilder? you yourself said it's in the rules and so it is
          Like you said 'it's in the rules'. That fight was judged to be a draw - it's in the rules. So Fury didn't beat Wilder like you said. You can't pick and choose with rules you agree with

          Comment

          • PunchyPotorff
            Undisputed Champion
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Dec 2012
            • 10384
            • 525
            • 1,304
            • 49,687

            #35
            Wow, your head must've taken a SHIIIIII-LOAD of punches. Maybe you should've learned some DEFENSE whenever you were in the ring.

            Most think Fury won, and that the draw was to guarantee the rematch and the resultant big $$.

            Read THAT again. MOST THINK does not mean OFFICIAL VERDICT, idiot boi.

            And AGAIN, DA, I said Wlad was out of the 3 year time frame: 'Or for that matter, Wlad'

            Get back with me after you take a reading comprehension course. Otherwise, stop wasting my time with your ****** comments.

            Comment

            Working...
            TOP