Bigger robbery. Pac vs marquez or canelo vs ggg

[aboutfkntime]

All their fights combined which one is a bigger robbery

Pacquiao/Marquez III

[boliodogs]

Pac vs Marquez 3.

Canelo vs GGG wasn't even a damn robbery Lol. Just bitter GGG fans that can't handle the L their boy took.

"Ay Lo Guize Im redy For Canelo"

Sure, you say that because you are an extreme Canelo lover and GGG hater. Most neutrals thought GGG won both fights and thought the 1st fight was a robbery and the 2nd fight was closer and not a true robbery but a bad decision, Canelo won the 2nd fight by the smallest possible amount in Canelo loving Vegas and one judge had it a draw. Had those fights been in an neutral place GGG would have won them both. Canelo will only fight top competition in Vegas because he likes that Vegas advantage.

[GrandpaBernard]

Marquez won 9 rounds and gave manny a boxing lesson.

Canelo/3G were actually close fights

[boliodogs]

I don't think any of the fights were true robberies but I think the GGG fights were incorrect decision and GGG should have won both fights, the first one by a wider margin, I scored the 2nd fight 7 rounds to 5 for GGG so a can't call two judges having it 7 rounds to 5 for Canelo a robbery. It was a god close fight and they are evenly matched with different fighting styles.

[strykr619]

PAC vs JMM I - judge Clements failed to score first round properly, cost PAC the fight.

This was the obvious robbery. Anyone ways saying any of the rematches are robberies are just fanboi's they were very competitive.

[strykr619]

GGG-Canelo 1 was a robbery, and this is why, Canelo won the rematch because he was the aggressor the whole fight, but in the first match GGG was the aggressor but some how Canelo got the draw. At this point its moot because we know Canelo won't give him the 3rd fight till he is 40.

GGG's problem in the rematch is he became a headhunter and did beat that body to a pulp. If he had spent the first 3-5 rounds with bodyshot, Canelo would of shelled up and made himself more of a target.