Comments Thread For: DAZN Narrows Field For Canelo 9/14 Opponent Selection

[TonyGe]

Isn't that what he said in the first place. What is gained by trying to argue that GGG Brook was less trash than Alvarez Khan? They were trash fights for different reasons. Why is there always some slick angle to try and paint GGG has better or different from other fighters or to distract from ducking and business decisions.

Remember when Jacobs was the guy who didn't deserve the fight cuz he'd get iced like Pirog iced him? Now he is his 2nd best win. See how GGG fans oscillate....

Both situations were not the same. Brooke was bigger than Khan. Brook was undefeated. Golovkin was negotiating to fight Eubank when his father scuttled them by being unreasonable. Getting Brook as a substitute allowed Golovkin to keep the fight in England .

[aboutfkntime]

as usual your facts are screwed up. Canelo fought khan, and then followed it up by moving down to 154 to fight Smith and then jumoing past a weight he said he needed to grow into for ggg to fight that bum Chavez Jr.

Smith was a championship level fight you moron, at 154

Khan was a filler/tune-up for Canelo...

Brook was showcase opportunity for Hypekin LMAO

Now I already acknowledged both brook and khan were trash fights but there's levels to this and khan was by far the easier of the two.

they were both shlt, nothing else matters

Canelo's filler, was shlt... and Golovkin's showcase, was shlt

Just struggled with algieri, had been ko'd twice at much lighter weights and hadn't held any world title in almost half a decade. Oh, and the brook fight only happened because Eubank Jr backed out of a deal. Canelo wanted no smoke with ggg at that time. Not sure when you Canelo cult cuck boys are gonna learn not to test me, you get sonned every time.

stop crying about nothing, you whiney bltch

only a total golov-tard, or a total fkn idiot... would attempt to question Canelo's resume, while defending Golovkin's resume LMAO... which one are you?

we have already established you are not a golov-tard, which leaves...

son, if you are trying to bash Canelo..... then you will need to use a bigger bat than Golovkin's resume

[Jab jab boom]

Smith was a championship level fight you moron, at 154

Khan was a filler/tune-up for Canelo...

Brook was showcase opportunity for Hypekin LMAO





they were both shlt, nothing else matters

Canelo's filler, was shlt... and Golovkin's showcase, was shlt





stop crying about nothing, you whiney bltch

only a total golov-tard, or a total fkn idiot... would attempt to question Canelo's resume, while defending Golovkin's resume LMAO... which one are you?

we have already established you are not a golov-tard, which leaves...

son, if you are trying to bash Canelo..... then you will need to use a bigger bat than Golovkin's resume

I stopped reading after you said beefy Smith (the weakest of all the 154 pound belt holders at the time) was a championship fight. You have no shame. Lmaoooooooooo

[Jsmooth9876]

Dazn had been doing this for two minutes. Oscar had been about that life. What makes you think they got one over on him?

Perhaps it was the contract they signed to have 11 fights on DAZN.

[Jab jab boom]

Your history and the tone of your posts say otherwise. Be it as it may, what's the value of pointing out the Khan fight? It was a money grab. End of. That's the real reason they fight. Not for fan bragging rights.

again, you should read the previous posts if you feel compelled to chime in. In a previous post, I proved that I critize both Canelo and ggg for things such as cherry picking and ducking. So the other guy asked why do i criticize canelo more and I said it's because there's more to criticize. Fighting a former lightweight in khan for a mw title defense was 1 example, testing positive for PEDs is another, not facing 2 wbc mandatories was another, as is the wbc creating fake belts strictly for his benefit. Now you're all caught up.

[Jsmooth9876]

... no way, kid!... do you really think that DAZN paid canelo $300 million in advance???



... Oscar was a "fight-by-fight" PPV guy, he never signed a 5 years deal with a "no name" in boxing...

Of course they didn't but they signed him to an 11 fight deal. They're not letting him walk away any time soon unless it makes no sense financially for THEM.

[aboutfkntime]

I stopped reading after you said beefy Smith (the weakest of all the 154 pound belt holders at the time) was a championship fight. You have no shame. Lmaoooooooooo

the guy was holding a title you fkn moron

meaning, that was a championship level fight

nobody said that he was the best jmw

Khan was a filler/tune-up for Canelo... but Brook was huge showcase opportunity for Hypekin LMAO

[aboutfkntime]

Of course they didn't but they signed him to an 11 fight deal. They're not letting him walk away any time soon unless it makes no sense financially for THEM.

he should demand Andrade, then claim breach of contract and walk

DAZN would then quickly... " approve "... Andrade

DAZN refusing to approve a undisputed unification title fight is... insane

I think that DAZN would immediately approve Andrade regardless as to whether they think Canelo could successfully argue a breach of contract

they would simply approve Andrade just to keep Canelo happy, and to avoid the bad press that would arise from a public split..... because, Andrade is a good championship-level fight anyway..... and because they can still get what they want next fight, if they play their cards right

speaking on DAZN playing their cards right.....

so, it really never occurred to DAZN to insist that Golovkin should fight Andrade to setup the trilogy with Canelo..... like Canelo insisted?..... and like everyone can see would be plain obvious common-sense

really ?

it sounds like they have a lot of faith in one of those guys..... but not much faith in the other

[aboutfkntime]

so, DANZ will not approve Andrade for Canelo.....

but, they will approve Rolls for Golovkin..... ?

wtf ???

you guys who continually bash Haymon for killing fights and protecting his investments..... where you at ?

you will not see a better example of killing fights and protecting investments than that LMAO

glaringly fkn obvious

[BeLikeWater]

Perhaps it was the contract they signed to have 11 fights on DAZN.

Well in that case...