It will be a big upset to most boxing fans but not to us Pacfans coz we always know that Pac would KO Morales.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
F**k Morales.
Collapse
-
I'm so dense, I don't get it! Some say, MAB fell to Pacquiao because Morales had done so much earlier damage on MAB in their two meetings. And then, in the same breath they say that Morales would axe Pacquiao down, no sweat! That's saying that the two Morales-Barrera fights were walks in the park by Morales; that Barrera barely touched Morales; that it was only Barrera who suffered; that Morales emerged not merely unscathed but even better for the experience! The controversy surrounding those humdingers do not tend to bear out those observations. Most experts believe that while Morales got the first decision, it should have gone to Barrera; and while Barrera got the second, it should have gone to Morales. In fights that close, how could one or the other have emerged unscathed?So ok, Morales is younger than Barrera and may have better recuperative powers, but any trainer worth his salt will tell you close fast paced, power punching contests leave permanent marks on the fighters that fought them, regardless of age. Pacquiao hasn't had any close fights, save arguably the last (vs. Marquez), that comes anywhere near the kind Morales and Barrera fought on those two times that they met. Pacman just simply rolled over his foes since Ldwaba. Even Barrera managed to sting Pacman only once or twice (the Nady-declared first round KD cannot be counted), before and after falling to Pacman's fists.
Comment
-
Originally posted by grayfistI'm so dense, I don't get it! Some say, MAB fell to Pacquiao because Morales had done so much earlier damage on MAB in their two meetings. And then, in the same breath they say that Morales would axe Pacquiao down, no sweat! That's saying that the two Morales-Barrera fights were walks in the park by Morales; that Barrera barely touched Morales; that it was only Barrera who suffered; that Morales emerged not merely unscathed but even better for the experience! The controversy surrounding those humdingers do not tend to bear out those observations. Most experts believe that while Morales got the first decision, it should have gone to Barrera; and while Barrera got the second, it should have gone to Morales. In fights that close, how could one or the other have emerged unscathed?So ok, Morales is younger than Barrera and may have better recuperative powers, but any trainer worth his salt will tell you close fast paced, power punching contests leave permanent marks on the fighters that fought them, regardless of age. Pacquiao hasn't had any close fights, save arguably the last (vs. Marquez), that comes anywhere near the kind Morales and Barrera fought on those two times that they met. Pacman just simply rolled over his foes since Ldwaba. Even Barrera managed to sting Pacman only once or twice (the Nady-declared first round KD cannot be counted), before and after falling to Pacman's fists.
Comment
-
Originally posted by m00ksYou'd think that's reason enough to at least give Pac the benefit of the doubt but I guess not. I guess they'll believe it when they see it. Pleasant surprises in life sometimes...
Comment
-
Originally posted by zaqwerMORALES is a chicken!!!!1
I respect Morales but his style is tailor-made for Pac. Marquez style is the one to give pac problems. I remember Pac going up against another ****er in Nedal Hussein but he still prevailed.
Comment
-
Originally posted by m00ksHows it going man.Thanks for asking! You? How ya doin'?
Comment
-
Originally posted by grayfistFinally got a few gigs and will've to forego this fun stuff for a while, starting in a couple of days. Damn! Life really can get in the way of fun!Thanks for asking! You? How ya doin'?
Comment
Comment