Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Sorry, but GGG is a FRAUD.

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Why aren’t you on Carl Frampton case for taking a tune up after a loss?

    Oh that’s right, because it’s completely normal LOL

    Originally posted by Robbie Barrett View Post
    Lame excuse. After talking years about all the titles he dropped one so he could fight an easy fight.

    This year he had a chance to fight for a title and chose Rolls instead. Now he's going to duck the title fight again for another garbage fight.

    The guy is a cherry picking POS. All he's ever had interest in is huge pay days against Canelo. He fed his fans garbage about all the belts and anyone from 154 to 168 and you clowns ate it up.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by ShaneMosleySr View Post
      Why aren’t you on Carl Frampton case for taking a tune up after a loss?

      Oh that’s right, because it’s completely normal LOL
      frampton and GGG are quite similar, true. One title, 2-3 year span titlists.
      Last edited by DreamFighter; 07-02-2019, 01:32 PM.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by ShaneMosleySr View Post
        Why aren’t you on Carl Frampton case for taking a tune up after a loss?

        Oh that’s right, because it’s completely normal LOL
        Nice that you acknowledge he lost.

        Comment


        • #34
          Yeah he lost the fight. Everyone has a tune up after a loss, unless they get the immediate rematch.

          GGG is the first fighter to ever be criticized for taking a tune up after a loss.

          Originally posted by Robbie Barrett View Post
          Nice that you acknowledge he lost.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by ShaneMosleySr View Post
            Yeah he lost the fight. Everyone has a tune up after a loss, unless they get the immediate rematch.

            GGG is the first fighter to ever be criticized for taking a tune up after a loss.
            How many fighters have a chance at another title fight after a loss and turn it down? Most fighters need to rebuild to get another shot. Golovkin didn't it was there for him and he chose to cherry pick instead.

            What's your excuse for him not wanting a title shot in September and going for Mungia instead?

            He's playing it safe like he did throughout his career. Just like when he refused to give Jacobs a rematch after scraping by. All he cares about is Canelo.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by KingHippo View Post
              GGG is slightly better than Danny Jacobs
              Originally posted by Jewish-Reptile View Post
              So we running with the notion Jacobs never beat GG I know the history books tell us GG did him fact beat him but NSB tried to rewrite history didn’t I’ll have to go through your history to find up who you thought won the fight or you could save me the trouble.
              Just state a fact and the micropeens go wild lol

              GGG fans are the biggest f@g$ in boxing

              Comment


              • #37
                He’s not most fighters, he can get a title shot whenever he wants it.

                Munguia is a bigger draw than Andrade and less risky.

                Why would he ever fight Andrade when he’ll eventually get a shot at Canelo again?

                The ultimate goal is to fight Canelo again and make the most money possible.

                That’s in the bag if he just keeps winning.

                So why would he fight a super risky fight against a guy that could beat him for a fraction of what he would get for fighting Canelo?

                If he did that, he’d be ******.

                So everyone is mad at him for not being ******, it’s hilarious. It’s the same thing with Derevenchenko. Why would he fight that guy before fighting Canelo? That’s just ******. No one would do it, unless they were ******.

                And btw, he didn’t play it safe his whole career. He unified three titles and defended them 20 times. He fought everyone at middleweight, he just hasn’t fought the two newest title threats yet. He fight Canelo twice and wants to fight him again. It’s insane to say he’s played it safe.

                Originally posted by Robbie Barrett View Post
                How many fighters have a chance at another title fight after a loss and turn it down? Most fighters need to rebuild to get another shot. Golovkin didn't it was there for him and he chose to cherry pick instead.

                What's your excuse for him not wanting a title shot in September and going for Mungia instead?

                He's playing it safe like he did throughout his career. Just like when he refused to give Jacobs a rematch after scraping by. All he cares about is Canelo.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by ShaneMosleySr View Post
                  He’s not most fighters, he can get a title shot whenever he wants it.

                  Munguia is a bigger draw than Andrade and less risky.

                  Why would he ever fight Andrade when he’ll eventually get a shot at Canelo again?

                  The ultimate goal is to fight Canelo again and make the most money possible.

                  That’s in the bag if he just keeps winning.

                  So why would he fight a super risky fight against a guy that could beat him for a fraction of what he would get for fighting Canelo?

                  If he did that, he’d be ******.

                  So everyone is mad at him for not being ******, it’s hilarious. It’s the same thing with Derevenchenko. Why would he fight that guy before fighting Canelo? That’s just ******. No one would do it, unless they were ******.

                  And btw, he didn’t play it safe his whole career. He unified three titles and defended them 20 times. He fought everyone at middleweight, he just hasn’t fought the two newest title threats yet. He fight Canelo twice and wants to fight him again. It’s insane to say he’s played it safe.
                  So you make threads saying Canelo is ducking fighter and then defend Golovkin cherry picking.

                  Golovkin did the exact same thing you just said his whole career. Take no risks and just keep winning until he got the big payday. Feed the fans garbage about wanting to fight anyone and wanting all the belts in the process.

                  You're ridiculously biased and a hypocrite.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by ShaneMosleySr View Post
                    H
                    And btw, he didn’t play it safe his whole career. He unified three titles and defended them 20 times. He fought everyone at middleweight, he just hasn’t fought the two newest title threats yet. He fight Canelo twice and wants to fight him again. It’s insane to say he’s played it safe.
                    no he won his first title in 2015. The others were handed to him outside the ring. That is not unification.

                    He defended his won title about 5 times? thereabouts.

                    He certainly didnt fight everyone at MW, in fact he fought everyone below a certain tier level.

                    But yes he did start facing top contenders with jacobs and canelo.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Damn right he is.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP