Login or Sign Up
Logging in...
Remember me
Log in
Or
Sign Up
Forgot password or user name?
Log in with
Forums
News
Schedule
Search
Galleries
New Topics
Today's Posts
Help
Member List
Calendar
Forums
News
Schedule
Search
Galleries
New Topics
Today's Posts
Help
Member List
Calendar
Home
Forum
Boxing Forums
Non Stop Boxing
The 'Non Stop Boxing' forum is visible to all users. To see additional forums please
register
or login.
Why were late 90s and early 2000s welterweights so short?
Collapse
Sign in or register here to comment
X
Collapse
Posts
Latest Activity
Photos
Sign In / Register
Page
of
2
Filter
Time
All Time
Today
Last Week
Last Month
Show
All
Discussions only
Photos only
Videos only
Links only
Polls only
Events only
Filtered by:
Clear All
new posts
Previous
1
2
template
Next
dibzvincent143
Undisputed Champion
Join Date:
Mar 2009
Posts:
5343
Received
359
Given
204
Points:
52,527
Share
Tweet
#11
06-28-2019, 01:29 AM
Originally posted by
The Problem
Pac 5'5, Floyd 5'7. Mosley 5'8. Cotto 5'7
You asked why the 90s wws are short but those dudes were not even welters at that point.
So i thought u’ll give examples on that time frame
Comment
Post
Cancel
OCPancho
Undisputed Champion
Join Date:
Apr 2014
Posts:
2139
Received
54
Given
17
Points:
31,860
Share
Tweet
#12
06-28-2019, 01:39 AM
Originally posted by
dibzvincent143
You asked why the 90s wws are short but those dudes were not even welters at that point.
So i thought u’ll give examples on that time frame
2009 must have been early 2000's. lol
Comment
Post
Cancel
ramses07
Undisputed Champion
Join Date:
Apr 2011
Posts:
2006
Received
226
Given
88
Points:
23,870
Share
Tweet
#13
06-28-2019, 01:52 AM
Ike, tito, Oscar and Vernon were huge for that weight class
Comment
Post
Cancel
Sign in or register here to comment
Previous
1
2
template
Next
Working...
Yes
No
OK
OK
Cancel
😀
😂
🥰
😘
🤢
😎
😞
😡
👍
👎
☕
TOP
Sign In
USERNAME
PASSWORD
Forgot password?
Remember Me
SIGN IN
Register
Get in on the latest boxing conversations in our Forum and comment on articles.
JOIN NOW
Comment