Tweet
Whoa whoa whoa. Cry like a bIetch ? 
Wth is wrong with you dude ? We're just talking boxing here. Seems like you take this stuff WAY too personal and heavy. I'm not into all that name calling and derogatory slander.
Check my history, you got the wrong dude. I'm about as objective as they come, and I NEVER initiate trash talk.
I just thought that "Daddy" talk was a bit far fetched and reeked of some sort of Hispanic bias.
Not all W's are created equal, and you HAVE to know this. Being someone's "Daddy" implies that they thoroughly wiped the floor with them and totally outclassed them. That was NOT the case in the Salido fight. Nobody said a close win wasn't a W ! I'm just saying a close win is not "Daddy" material.
What the heck is wrong with you, man ? You seem extremely defensive like you are harboring a vendetta... You throw a lot of hate and shade on this forum.
I don't mind trash-talk, fandom, and bias, as long as it is lighthearted and fun.
I have ZERO tribal favorites. Again, check my posts.
I've worked with an all-Guatemalan crew for 18 years and speak fluent Spanish, so if anything, Hispanics are my homies. I just gave a fair, objective, and contextual overview of that fight. You obviously don't care to talk objectively, and I suspect I could find 20 people on NSB who concur with me.
You might need to chill out a bit or take some time off. That kind of talk is uncalled for. Anybody can see you have a passionate bias, which is fine... as long as you maintain respect and keep it fun.
Anyhow I don't play that nasty talk, and definitely won't be talking boxing with you again, if you can't discuss with respect and civility.
Peace.
Wth is wrong with you dude ? We're just talking boxing here. Seems like you take this stuff WAY too personal and heavy. I'm not into all that name calling and derogatory slander. Check my history, you got the wrong dude. I'm about as objective as they come, and I NEVER initiate trash talk.
I just thought that "Daddy" talk was a bit far fetched and reeked of some sort of Hispanic bias.
Not all W's are created equal, and you HAVE to know this. Being someone's "Daddy" implies that they thoroughly wiped the floor with them and totally outclassed them. That was NOT the case in the Salido fight. Nobody said a close win wasn't a W ! I'm just saying a close win is not "Daddy" material.
What the heck is wrong with you, man ? You seem extremely defensive like you are harboring a vendetta... You throw a lot of hate and shade on this forum.
I don't mind trash-talk, fandom, and bias, as long as it is lighthearted and fun.
I have ZERO tribal favorites. Again, check my posts.
I've worked with an all-Guatemalan crew for 18 years and speak fluent Spanish, so if anything, Hispanics are my homies. I just gave a fair, objective, and contextual overview of that fight. You obviously don't care to talk objectively, and I suspect I could find 20 people on NSB who concur with me.
You might need to chill out a bit or take some time off. That kind of talk is uncalled for. Anybody can see you have a passionate bias, which is fine... as long as you maintain respect and keep it fun.
Anyhow I don't play that nasty talk, and definitely won't be talking boxing with you again, if you can't discuss with respect and civility.
Peace.
Period.
Deal with that
Salido had a different style, his style was strange, he was not scared about Loma skills and he never respected him
You can say what you want
Salido deserved the win and he won, that can't change .
Salido, his daddy... Like Canelo is the daddy of Lomachenko
WHAT ????? Are you kidding me ? I just wouldn't say that about fighters who risk serious bodily harm in the ring. It's classless and...
Comment