Comments Thread For: Who's Going To Win? The Most Dangerous Question in Boxing

[Terrell1555]

Totally agree with your assessment! I watched Pac VS Broner and yes he won but he wasn’t impressive. He wasn’t sharp and was missing a lot of shot against a Target right there, plus Broner does not let his hands go, and refuses to use his legs. Broner ring IQ is so so crappy! Meanwhile I think Thurman is going to come in sharp and hella prepared! He’s being overlooked by many based on a lack luster performance after a two year two surgery layoff. But against Pac a global superstar he gone bring it and unlike Broner he throws punches! And unlike Bradley he has pop!

[Letmaku]

I really don't care about this fight as and it's a lose/lose for Thurman. If Thurman can't KO and old guy like Manny (Legend but old) than it shows he wasn't as good as he thought. If Manny wins Thurman just lost to an old guy.

If Thurman wins he will be recognized worldwide more than Crawford & Spence!

[Alan Smithee]

I really don't care about this fight as and it's a lose/lose for Thurman. If Thurman can't KO and old guy like Manny (Legend but old) than it shows he wasn't as good as he thought. If Manny wins Thurman just lost to an old guy.

Agreed! This is a nice payday for Keith but he is in a can't win situation. Even an early K.O would be blamed on " beating a 40 year old". The undercard does look decent though!

[pasawayako]

This is the best fight of the welterweight.

[devildg]

Thurman hasnt knocked anyone of significance in his entire career.

He's not knocking out Pacquiao if they fought 10 times. Maybe a lucky liver shot.

If there is anyone with a chance of getting knocked out its Thurman. We've seen him rocked far too many times and by seemingly not so powerful punches. Same cannot be said for Pacquiao, who was last hurt by a punch from Juan Manuel Marquez ages ago.

Still, if you are a betting man the safe bet is with Thurman

[Level37scythe]

Thurman hasnt knocked anyone of significance in his entire career.

He's not knocking out Pacquiao if they fought 10 times. Maybe a lucky liver shot.

If there is anyone with a chance of getting knocked out its Thurman. We've seen him rocked far too many times and by seemingly not so powerful punches. Same cannot be said for Pacquiao, who was last hurt by a punch from Juan Manuel Marquez ages ago.

Still, if you are a betting man the safe bet is with Thurman

Lol you think Marquez ever punched harder than Thurman?

[Oregonian]

“Thurman, a legitimate, 30-year-old 147-pounder with a great deal of talent and advantages” — that’s the only line we need to keep in mind.

PAC has made a great name for himself fighting BUMS like Brandon Rios, Broner, MATHYSSE (all coming off losses), or catch weights (Cotto, Margarito) and both were damaged good by then

This is the first true WW that PAC is facing

[radiotracer]

“Thurman, a legitimate, 30-year-old 147-pounder with a great deal of talent and advantages” — that’s the only line we need to keep in mind.

PAC has made a great name for himself fighting BUMS like Brandon Rios, Broner, MATHYSSE (all coming off losses), or catch weights (Cotto, Margarito) and both were damaged good by then

This is the first true WW that PAC is facing

I’m sure after PAC beats this guy you and many others will make excuses for Thurman. Just like your reasons for Pacs wins.

[PoserExposer]

Add this to your countless plates of crow.

[JERMELL_CHARLO_]

Michael Rosenthal, just stop watching boxing, you don't know shtt about it, you don't understand what you're watching

Same puto who said that GODnelo is not the best fighter right now & that he is just a good boxer not excellent/great.

Michael Rosenthal no vales pito I know you're going to read this maricon de mierda. Your boring ass faves dont have a resume like
GODnelo and YDSAB u lame ass fāggot.