Originally posted by M Bison
View Post
I just tend to in general favor the aggressor in a fight and I don't feel Danny really did enough to win...also, not that it is a scoring criteria - but Danny just 'looked' like he was losing to me as that fight went on...I just found it hard to give him rounds at the end of some of those rounds.
For sure we agree that Canelo as the popular fighter he is, he definitely gets all the help he needs out there. And I certainly agree that he too often fights in spurts...and especially against someone like GGG that is a bad recipe...partially for that reason I felt those 2 fights were pretty straightforward wins for GGG...GGG is so active that many of those rounds were just clear rounds for him based on output.
Canelo to me definitely fought better and was even more consistent with his effort in the 2nd fight...felt he had fewer stamina issues in that one as well...also I felt he put himself in some of the rounds against GGG where GGG outlanded him, because Canelo for me landed the better punch or combo of the round.
But yeah, when you are outlanded by multiple punches almost every round, I mean it is hard to give that guy rounds ya know? At best you can make some of them close rounds and even maybe take a good percentage of those...and I actually did that for Canelo in both fights...but even then it was an 8-4 type victory for GGG in both. Low output vs high output means very few clear rounds for someone like Canelo.
But yeah my friend I definitely agree that it would be nice if fights and fighters could be judged purely on merit and nothing else would matter...sometimes we get that but usually there is some favoritism or home cooking...for that reason it would be great if the real boxing fans on a forum like this would keep it real about what we see in these fights and fighters...but most of us on here are just as bad as anywhere else lol...oh well what can ya do..still a fun sport to analyze and watch and appreciate.
Comment