Comments Thread For: Fury: There Were '3' Horses at Heavyweight - Now There Are '2'

[JERMELL_CHARLO_]

Belts mean nothing.

You want to tell me Ryan Burnett was the best Bantamweight in the world when he had more belts than anyone? Of course not.

Ruiz is a B level fighter that just had a very good win. Fair play to him but he’s not as good as the likes of Fury. He’s on borrowed time with the belts even if he beats AJ again. He will get fed to Wilder, or start losing them in some mandatory defence because he isn’t that good.

Let’s not forget every belt Ruiz has once belonged to Fury and he never lost them in the ring.

That hideous ogre that punches like a HW Paulie would get his ass kicked by Ruiz like ffs even Joshua punches harder than TF. Andy wont need 7 rounds to do it either he would have 5 more as well since the blueprint to get a victory over the Gypsy Fraud is there ever since Deontay W knocked down his ass twice.

[sensfulviolence]

Ruiz is #3. If Fury & Wilder fight, then the winner will be THE MAN at HW, IMO.

But if for some reason that fight doesnt happen, if one of them were to fight the Ruiz/AJ II winner, then whoever wins that is THE MAN.

So you all need to quit w/ the stage shows and showcase fights and fight each other.

[deathofaclown]

That hideous ogre that punches like a HW Paulie would get his ass kicked by Ruiz like ffs even Joshua punches harder than TF. Andy wont need 7 rounds to do it either he would have 5 more as well since the blueprint to get a victory over the Gypsy Fraud is there ever since Deontay W knocked down his ass twice.

Lol, fat boy wouldn’t lay a glove on Fury.

Just because fatty beat this era’s Frank Bruno doesn’t mean he can beat anyone good at the top of the division.

It’s hilarious, people are seething that Fury is no.1 in the heavyweight game.

I’ll guarantee you that this time next year, Andy Ruiz will not be a world champion and Tyson Fury will still be considered a top heavyweight. Even if Ruiz gets past AJ, he’s getting fed to Wilder and demolished.

[TinAgeOfBoxing]

Ruiz and Wilder.

[hitking]

If you're going by that standard, Ruiz should be undefeated I had him winning the fight with Parker by two rounds, and Wilder should not be undefeated as I have him losing to Fury 8-4, so Andy and Fury should be the only undefeated fighters in the division. So in a way Fury is right if you're going for undefeated records.

Unfortunately, your scorecard is irrelevant in both fights. So we’ll have to stick with the official results.

[LoadedWraps]

Best heavyweight of his era and some people can’t handle it.

[hitking]

he accomplished nothing, the guy he fought got hurt and martin was handed a belt literally

I know some boxing fans will never view the belts with the indifference that I do, especially the newer fans. And that’s fine. But when your leads you to making an argument on Charles Martin’s behalf that he was a relevant heavyweight. Its seriously time to sit down and re-evaluate how you follow the sport.

[elfag]

Absolutely.

Joshua was vastly overrated and we were told he was elite level on the same playing field as Wilder and Fury.

Now following Joshua's brutal destruction at the hands of a clinically obese burrito stand dishwasher, we know we were sold a story of lies with Joshua, his chin was always known to be shaky but we didnt know it was 10,000 year old dry brittle pure china.

[Larry the boss]

I know some boxing fans will never view the belts with the indifference that I do, especially the newer fans. And that’s fine. But when your leads you to making an argument on Charles Martin’s behalf that he was a relevant heavyweight. Its seriously time to sit down and re-evaluate how you follow the sport.

Exactly...lol

[Ajvar]

Nobody took Fury’s belts in the ring. He won them all off a proper champ too.

You are as good of a boxer as you were in your last fight.
Fury didn't even show himself at the rematch with Klitschko so that's how he lost belts.
He was "fighting" UK Antidope agency though, you must be a fan of him.