Tyson Fury is a clean fighter

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • removed
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Nov 2008
    • 21479
    • 4,005
    • 831
    • 164,542

    #1

    Tyson Fury is a clean fighter

    Tyson served a backdated ban and thus has served his time. He's a clean fighter until proven otherwise.

    Anyone claiming otherwise is a liar.
  • RoyJonesJrp4pno1
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • May 2005
    • 4617
    • 113
    • 4
    • 39,642

    #2
    If he was clean there would have been no ban. Great thread Einstein.

    Comment

    • removed
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Nov 2008
      • 21479
      • 4,005
      • 831
      • 164,542

      #3
      Originally posted by RoyJonesJrp4pno1
      If he was clean there would have been no ban. Great thread Einstein.
      He's clean now, dumbass.

      Tbf he always was clean, it was a stitch up by UKAD, but i cba going into all that now.

      Comment

      • mlac
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Feb 2014
        • 20337
        • 1,630
        • 1,486
        • 210,093

        #4
        'it was a stich up'

        If you give the benefit of the doubt to Fury popping for Nandrolone and claiming it was 'uncastrated boar'

        Do you also give the benefit of the doubt to Lucas Browne claiming the Russians tainted his water, to Canelo for tainted taco's, Galahad for his brother spiking him with PEDS, to BJS for nasal inhalers?

        basically you have to give the benefit of the doubt to everyone who popped for PEDS, or is just Fury because your a fangirl?

        Comment

        • removed
          Undisputed Champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Nov 2008
          • 21479
          • 4,005
          • 831
          • 164,542

          #5
          Originally posted by mlac
          'it was a stich up'

          If you give the benefit of the doubt to Fury popping for Nandrolone and claiming it was 'uncastrated boar'

          Do you also give the benefit of the doubt to Lucas Browne claiming the Russians tainted his water, to Canelo for tainted taco's, Galahad for his brother spiking him with PEDS, to BJS for nasal inhalers?

          basically you have to give the benefit of the doubt to everyone who popped for PEDS, or is just Fury because your a fangirl?
          The facts - https://www.dailystar.co.uk/sport/bo...Doping-hearing

          Comment

          • mlac
            Undisputed Champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Feb 2014
            • 20337
            • 1,630
            • 1,486
            • 210,093

            #6
            Originally posted by denium
            Yes mate because a article in the daily star written by Fury's promoter is definately going to be impartial and fact based

            Comment

            • removed
              Undisputed Champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Nov 2008
              • 21479
              • 4,005
              • 831
              • 164,542

              #7
              Originally posted by mlac
              Yes mate because a article in the daily star written by Fury's promoter is definately going to be impartial and fact based
              Prove me wrong then. Show me the interview of Fury claiming it was due to eating boar?

              You are probably one of these guys who sees "anonymous sources" in a news article and takes it as the truth.

              Comment

              • mlac
                Undisputed Champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Feb 2014
                • 20337
                • 1,630
                • 1,486
                • 210,093

                #8
                Originally posted by denium
                Prove me wrong then. Show me the interview of Fury claiming it was due to eating boar?

                You are probably one of these guys who sees "anonymous sources" in a news article and takes it as the truth.
                seriously? you are talking about credability and 'sources' and you post an article in the daily ****ing star by furys own promotor? FFS.

                The former heavyweight champion of the world has received a two-year ban from boxing which has been backdated to December 2015, UK Anti-Doping has announced


                ''Fury's cousin and fellow heavyweight fighter Hughie, 23, also tested positive for elevated levels of the banned steroid nandrolone.

                Both men blamed the result on eating uncastrated wild boar. It is a similar defence to the one used by Spanish cyclist and two-time Tour de France winner Alberto Contador, who tested positive for the banned steroid in 2010.''

                Comment

                • removed
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Nov 2008
                  • 21479
                  • 4,005
                  • 831
                  • 164,542

                  #9
                  Originally posted by mlac
                  seriously? you are talking about credability and 'sources' and you post an article in the daily ****ing star by furys own promotor? FFS.

                  The former heavyweight champion of the world has received a two-year ban from boxing which has been backdated to December 2015, UK Anti-Doping has announced


                  ''Fury's cousin and fellow heavyweight fighter Hughie, 23, also tested positive for elevated levels of the banned steroid nandrolone.

                  Both men blamed the result on eating uncastrated wild boar. It is a similar defence to the one used by Spanish cyclist and two-time Tour de France winner Alberto Contador, who tested positive for the banned steroid in 2010.''
                  When did Fury claim it was due to eating boar? Who did he claim it to? Just because a journalist states something, doesn't mean it's true.

                  I posted a direct statement from Frank Warren, written by him, the paper/website is irrelevant.

                  Comment

                  • mlac
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Feb 2014
                    • 20337
                    • 1,630
                    • 1,486
                    • 210,093

                    #10
                    Originally posted by denium
                    When did Fury claim it was due to eating boar? Who did he claim it to? Just because a journalist states something, doesn't mean it's true.

                    I posted a direct statement from Frank Warren, written by him, the paper/website is irrelevant.
                    The statement from Warren is irrelevant, of course hes going to defend his own fighter you complete mong.

                    Fish eyes never denies they popped for Nandrolone, all he says is ' but they havent popped since' lol. and he claims Fury said it was a due to a 'high protein diet'.

                    Wild boar / Eating meat. same ****ing thing.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP