Who will rank higher in history: Canelo or Golovkin?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bigdunny1
    Undisputed Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Mar 2015
    • 14762
    • 382
    • 2
    • 167,136

    #21
    bumping for Boxing1013

    Comment

    • bigdunny1
      Undisputed Champion
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Mar 2015
      • 14762
      • 382
      • 2
      • 167,136

      #22
      Bump......

      Comment

      • Curtis Harper
        Banned
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Dec 2018
        • 10114
        • 254
        • 446
        • 303,080

        #23
        If only everything in life was as easy as this poll.....

        Comment

        • ruedboy
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jul 2015
          • 4164
          • 386
          • 381
          • 101,745

          #24
          After 2 close fights, if there's no 3rd fight, history will show Alvarez wasn't willing to fight a 3rd time.
          Fans will see this according to their bias.
          Either Alvarez's agenda didn't include Golovkin or that he ducked.

          Comment

          • Real King Kong
            Undisputed Champion
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • May 2010
            • 12017
            • 454
            • 24
            • 105,905

            #25
            Canelo, but I’m not sure why people would be concerned with this when both guys are still active and should be fighting each other. We could be discussing who will win their fight in September if the fight was actually happening, not looking for some other way to compare them.

            Comment

            • Nige
              Up and Comer
              Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
              • Jun 2019
              • 74
              • 12
              • 44
              • 3,691

              #26
              Originally posted by boliodogs
              I think GGG is a little better and I don't think Canelo can change that. They had two fights and I think GGG won both fights. In the first fight Canelo was a prime 27 and GGG was an old 35. In the 2nd fight Canelo was a prime 28 and GGG was an even older 36. When a boxer many years past his prime edges out an 8 year younger boxer in his prime I say the older boxer is better.
              Does age really matter when one was 13 years into a pro career and the other one 12 years into it?

              Comment

              • JakeTheBoxer
                undisputed champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Dec 2014
                • 20983
                • 4,582
                • 2,782
                • 123,960

                #27
                Those who beats Andrade and Jermall.

                Comment

                • QballLobo
                  Undisputed Champion
                  • Nov 2011
                  • 7144
                  • 1,304
                  • 112
                  • 48,002

                  #28
                  Lol is this even a question???

                  Comment

                  • ruedboy
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Jul 2015
                    • 4164
                    • 386
                    • 381
                    • 101,745

                    #29
                    Originally posted by Real King Kong
                    Canelo, but I’m not sure why people would be concerned with this when both guys are still active and should be fighting each other. We could be discussing who will win their fight in September if the fight was actually happening, not looking for some other way to compare them.
                    I agree. It makes you wonder why Alvarez fans are constantly comparing their guy favorably to Golovkin but aren't too interested in a third fight.

                    Comment

                    • AKAcronym
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Jul 2013
                      • 5525
                      • 1,030
                      • 0
                      • 852,072

                      #30
                      Originally posted by Nige
                      Does age really matter when one was 13 years into a pro career and the other one 12 years into it?
                      Yes because the overwhelming amount of boxers/athletes are either retired or perform at a lesser level once in their mid 30's. Golovkin was already showing decline in 2016 and even Hopkins took notice and was making comments. They knew what they were doing by waiting Golovkin out.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP