Hearn said WBO won’t strip Ruiz

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ShaneMosleySr
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Mar 2019
    • 10325
    • 1,049
    • 903
    • 276,311

    #1

    Hearn said WBO won’t strip Ruiz

    And that was only 10 days ago.

    “The rematch takes precedence anyway over the belts,” Hearn said during a post-fight press conference early Sunday morning at Madison Square Garden. “But listen, the next mandatory [due] is the WBO. And I’ve already spoken to [WBO president] Paco Valcarcel, who would have no issues with the rematch anyway. We don’t want Andy Ruiz to lose [a belt]. Anthony don’t wanna lose one of these belts.“

    NEW YORK – Eddie Hearn expects Anthony Joshua to have a chance to win back each of the four heavyweight titles he lost to Andy Ruiz Jr. The only potential problem is that Joshua, had he defeated Ruiz on Saturday night, was expected to make a mandatory defense of the IBF championship against Bulgaria’s Kubrat Pulev in his following fight. Hearn had discussed the possibility of putting together a Joshua-Pulev fight for October or November with representatives of Bob Arum’s Top Rank Inc., Pulev’s promoter.


    What changed?
  • RJJ-94-02=GOAT
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Oct 2017
    • 28912
    • 9,232
    • 2,039
    • 246,831

    #2
    If Hearn had any business sense he’d get the WBO mandatory called ASAP.
    Just think about it...

    The WBO strip Ruiz. The AJ rematch is now for two instead of three belts. Who cares, the fight remains a interesting regardless.

    The WBO would likely order Usyk-Whyte for the vacant title. This GUARANTEES Hearn a piece of the HW title even if AJ loses again.

    It also gives Hearn another fight to put on UK PPV so he can suck more money out of the deluded casuals.

    If AJ does lose to Ruiz, it prevents Haymon from having a HW title monopoly and also gives AJ an opportunity to regain a title, which could plausibly be a rematch with Whyte which would be a big deal over here.

    The problem is: Does Hearn have any business sense?

    Comment

    • _Rexy_
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jan 2018
      • 27929
      • 6,140
      • 3,585
      • 358,040

      #3
      Originally posted by RJJ-94-02=GOAT
      If Hearn had any business sense he’d get the WBO mandatory called ASAP.
      Just think about it...

      The WBO strip Ruiz. The AJ rematch is now for two instead of three belts. Who cares, the fight remains a interesting regardless.

      The WBO would likely order Usyk-Whyte for the vacant title. This GUARANTEES Hearn a piece of the HW title even if AJ loses again.

      It also gives Hearn another fight to put on UK PPV so he can suck more money out of the deluded casuals.

      If AJ does lose to Ruiz, it prevents Haymon from having a HW title monopoly and also gives AJ an opportunity to regain a title, which could plausibly be a rematch with Whyte which would be a big deal over here.

      The problem is: Does Hearn have any business sense?
      if the WBO calls their fight it will be after Saturday. If/when that happens, Fury will be #1 in their rankings. And Usyk has to use his #1 contender card or he'll lose it. So the vacant title could be Fury/Whyte

      Comment

      • Laligalaliga
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Mar 2018
        • 6439
        • 71
        • 11
        • 90,109

        #4
        Originally posted by RJJ-94-02=GOAT
        If Hearn had any business sense he’d get the WBO mandatory called ASAP.
        Just think about it...

        The WBO strip Ruiz. The AJ rematch is now for two instead of three belts. Who cares, the fight remains a interesting regardless.

        The WBO would likely order Usyk-Whyte for the vacant title. This GUARANTEES Hearn a piece of the HW title even if AJ loses again.

        It also gives Hearn another fight to put on UK PPV so he can suck more money out of the deluded casuals.

        If AJ does lose to Ruiz, it prevents Haymon from having a HW title monopoly and also gives AJ an opportunity to regain a title, which could plausibly be a rematch with Whyte which would be a big deal over here.

        The problem is: Does Hearn have any business sense?
        If you have business sense just the way your mind is telling, why aren't you a promoter instead.
        STFU and learn from the masters.

        Comment

        • sicko
          The Truth Hurts
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • May 2010
          • 34211
          • 2,594
          • 839
          • 151,307

          #5
          Hearn behind the scenes begging

          WBC, WBA and IBF

          After that the rest of those belts DON'T MATTER IMO! too many damn Belts!

          Comment

          • Phenom
            Phenomdeaux
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • May 2010
            • 12218
            • 494
            • 363
            • 101,474

            #6
            Seriously people b1tching about Wilder fighting 1 mandatory since 2017 but 3 belts only called 1 mandatory since the same time

            So quick to strip Fury doe...

            Comment

            • Phenom
              Phenomdeaux
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • May 2010
              • 12218
              • 494
              • 363
              • 101,474

              #7
              Originally posted by RJJ-94-02=GOAT
              If Hearn had any business sense he’d get the WBO mandatory called ASAP.
              Just think about it...

              The WBO strip Ruiz. The AJ rematch is now for two instead of three belts. Who cares, the fight remains a interesting regardless.

              The WBO would likely order Usyk-Whyte for the vacant title. This GUARANTEES Hearn a piece of the HW title even if AJ loses again.

              It also gives Hearn another fight to put on UK PPV so he can suck more money out of the deluded casuals.

              If AJ does lose to Ruiz, it prevents Haymon from having a HW title monopoly and also gives AJ an opportunity to regain a title, which could plausibly be a rematch with Whyte which would be a big deal over here.

              The problem is: Does Hearn have any business sense?
              Usyk wouldn't fight for the vacant belt he is not ranked in top 5

              mandatory is different from rankings for vacant belt

              Comment

              • RJJ-94-02=GOAT
                Undisputed Champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Oct 2017
                • 28912
                • 9,232
                • 2,039
                • 246,831

                #8
                Originally posted by Laligalaliga
                If you have business sense just the way your mind is telling, why aren't you a promoter instead.
                STFU and learn from the masters.
                I didn’t have a multi-millionaire Dad who gave me a job as Managing Director in his already successful Promotional company.

                “Masters”😂😂 Pipe down you little clown.

                Comment

                • RJJ-94-02=GOAT
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Oct 2017
                  • 28912
                  • 9,232
                  • 2,039
                  • 246,831

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Phenom
                  Usyk wouldn't fight for the vacant belt he is not ranked in top 5

                  mandatory is different from rankings for vacant belt
                  From what I understand, once Usyk officially moves up he will be installed as #1/mandatory therefore would fight for the WBO title if it became vacant.
                  BJS just done exactly this in his last fight.

                  Comment

                  • RJJ-94-02=GOAT
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Oct 2017
                    • 28912
                    • 9,232
                    • 2,039
                    • 246,831

                    #10
                    Originally posted by _Rexy_
                    if the WBO calls their fight it will be after Saturday. If/when that happens, Fury will be #1 in their rankings. And Usyk has to use his #1 contender card or he'll lose it. So the vacant title could be Fury/Whyte
                    I could see Bob/Frank manoeuvring Fury into #1. Based off the current rankings it would be Usyk and Whyte though.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP