Tweet
As many of you know there has been much speculation about Anthony Joshua use of TUE. For those of you who don’t know what a TUE is. It’s an exemption that allows an athlete to use, for the****utic purposes only, a prohibited substance or method. UKAD was recently contacted about the situation but failed to give an direct answer. Should TUEs be public in a deadly sport such as boxing? They don’t have to give us details they can just confirm yes or no without releasing medical information.
Shouldn’t an opposing fighter have the option of not fighting a fighter who has a TUE. Why wouldn’t the UKAD deny it if AJ truly weren’t receiving TUEs?
Here’s UKAD reply.
They’ve also failed to address Tyson Fury’s victory of Christian Hammer as it was supposed to be a DQ. Badou Jack recently had his loss against Bute changed to a win.
Shouldn’t an opposing fighter have the option of not fighting a fighter who has a TUE. Why wouldn’t the UKAD deny it if AJ truly weren’t receiving TUEs?
Here’s UKAD reply.
They’ve also failed to address Tyson Fury’s victory of Christian Hammer as it was supposed to be a DQ. Badou Jack recently had his loss against Bute changed to a win.
Comment