Comments Thread For: Lubin's Coach: Erickson Would Love To Retire Trout Next!

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • KTFOKING
    Undisputed Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Jun 2018
    • 14399
    • 1,266
    • 284
    • 344,781

    #11
    Originally posted by richardt
    So everyone knows Gausha won and Lubin is calling out the loser of that fight? WTF? Talk about aiming low. He should be fighting Gausha or better yet, Lara but instead he wants the guy who lost to those two fighters. Thats obviously lacking confidence.
    His trainer is calling out Trout, not Lubin himself.

    But I'm fine with the Trout fight. Trout is going to go rounds with everyone and he will make Lubin think even if he's past his physical prime.

    Comment

    • Mr.365
      Undisputed Champion
      • Oct 2018
      • 1233
      • 77
      • 153
      • 36,030

      #12
      Austin Trout wont retire even if he losses 😂 sadly I think it's going to take for him to get really hurt to finally retire

      Comment

      • MasterPlan
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Apr 2014
        • 6386
        • 180
        • 1
        • 57,678

        #13
        Originally posted by Bronx2245
        If you thought Gausha won clearly, why call out Trout? WEAK! Cunnigham should be calling out Lara! He already beat both Trout and Gausha! Lara should be the target, and Florida show be the host! MAN UP!
        You call out the guy with the name. He's doing it right.
        Gausha will be there.

        Comment

        • richardt
          Undisputed Champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Nov 2007
          • 22177
          • 2,644
          • 210
          • 77,067

          #14
          Originally posted by KTFOKING
          His trainer is calling out Trout, not Lubin himself.
          No, his trainer is speaking on Lubin's behalf because he said that Lubin would love the fight so that is synonymous with calling out Trout. Lubin clearly doesnt have his confidence back and is aiming low because he wants to fight a washed up guy instead of either of the two guys who beat him. Trout is no longer a name and beating him is doing nothing notable. Beating Gausha or Lara is notable.
          Last edited by richardt; 05-27-2019, 02:00 PM.

          Comment

          • killakali
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Oct 2010
            • 7197
            • 226
            • 171
            • 87,195

            #15
            The official result is a draw and Austin Trout is a much bigger name and former champion. Not rocket science why he would rather fight Trout.

            Comment

            • Bronx2245
              Undisputed Champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • May 2013
              • 28551
              • 5,435
              • 1,423
              • 162,064

              #16
              Originally posted by MasterPlan
              You call out the guy with the name. He's doing it right.
              Gausha will be there.
              Who has the bigger name, Lara or Trout?

              Comment

              • KTFOKING
                Undisputed Champion
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Jun 2018
                • 14399
                • 1,266
                • 284
                • 344,781

                #17
                Originally posted by richardt
                No, his trainer is speaking on Lubin's behalf because he said that Lubin would love the fight so that is synonymous with calling out Trout. Lubin clearly doesnt have his confidence back and is aiming low because he wants to fight a washed up guy instead of either of the two guys who beat him. Trout is no longer a name and beating him is doing nothing notable. Beating Gausha or Lara is notable.
                If you want to say Lubin's confidence isn't back yet, then why exactly would he feat Gausha who isn't a big puncher himself? I highly doubt Lubin would be turning down a Gausha fight if offered to him. Regardless if Gausha should have gotten the win or not, a Trout fight would still be good for Lubin. He at the very least is going 10 strong rounds with him and will make him think. Lubin can get himself a title shot next year, but he can't skip any steps this time around. Needs a fight against a caliber of Trout/Gausha after his next fight and then someone like Castano would be good. Though I suspect he may have to face someone like Garcia to become a mandatory for the WBC strap....And that would be perfectly fine as well.

                Comment

                • richardt
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Nov 2007
                  • 22177
                  • 2,644
                  • 210
                  • 77,067

                  #18
                  Originally posted by KTFOKING
                  If you want to say Lubin's confidence isn't back yet, then why exactly would he feat Gausha who isn't a big puncher himself? I highly doubt Lubin would be turning down a Gausha fight if offered to him. Regardless if Gausha should have gotten the win or not, a Trout fight would still be good for Lubin. He at the very least is going 10 strong rounds with him and will make him think. Lubin can get himself a title shot next year, but he can't skip any steps this time around. Needs a fight against a caliber of Trout/Gausha after his next fight and then someone like Castano would be good. Though I suspect he may have to face someone like Garcia to become a mandatory for the WBC strap....And that would be perfectly fine as well.
                  It's not about confidence against a puncher - it is about confidence to fight the winner of last Saturday's fight, not the loser. NO ONE wants to see Lubin vs a washed up Trout. Gausha or Lara would be aiming high, Trout is aiming low.

                  Comment

                  • KTFOKING
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Jun 2018
                    • 14399
                    • 1,266
                    • 284
                    • 344,781

                    #19
                    Originally posted by richardt
                    It's not about confidence against a puncher - it is about confidence to fight the winner of last Saturday's fight, not the loser. NO ONE wants to see Lubin vs a washed up Trout. Gausha or Lara would be aiming high, Trout is aiming low.
                    That's fine, he doesn't need to go straight to the top yet. He will get his title shot sometime next year in all likelihood looking at the WBC rankings.

                    So when did Gausha turn into this great fighter? You're acting like he is levels above Trout or something. Don't even compare Lara to Gausha as that's totally different levels....And we say it when those two fought each other.

                    And reading that article, that quote came from Cunningham. Lubin as far as I can tell wasn't even in the building when he said that. Cunningham said Lubin would love to send Trout in retirement since Gausha couldn't. To me that means they expected Trout to win this fight and he had that quote ready for if he got interviewed afterwards. I wouldn't make too much of that quote.

                    Comment

                    • CoachMac34
                      Contender
                      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                      • Sep 2016
                      • 342
                      • 10
                      • 1
                      • 12,880

                      #20
                      Originally posted by Bronx2245
                      Who has the bigger name, Lara or Trout?
                      If you hadn't called Lara's name, no one would've thought of him! Does the guy even still fight?! Lubin is calling out the former champ that just fought, whose name is on the public's conscience right now. Smart move!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP