Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Breazeale: Wilder Had 40 Bogus-Ass Fights; Fought 2 Credible Guys

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Originally posted by Oldskoolg View Post
    One thing is abundantly clear, breazeale follows the anti-PBC channels and reads the uk commenters on social media. I predict he leaves PBC after this and signs with Hearn and dazn
    I wouldn’t be surprised if he does that actually. Since he lost to Joshua he has had 3 fights with 22 rounds all put together. Whyte who lost 6 months prior has fought 9 times and had 82 rounds.... At least Breazeale would be kept active.

    Comment


    • #52
      Originally posted by JakeTheBoxer View Post
      Sure, Povetkin is more credible guy than Ortiz.

      Ortiz is the same class than guys like Takam. Thing is, Takam had more difficult fights and that`s why he has 5 losses.
      what exactly does povetkin do better than Ortiz?

      Comment


      • #53
        Originally posted by Jab jab boom View Post
        what exactly does povetkin do better than Ortiz?
        He is more experienced guy with better wins.

        Ortiz does things ok, but he lacks experience on high level.

        Comment


        • #54
          Originally posted by Oldskoolg View Post
          One thing is abundantly clear, breazeale follows the anti-PBC channels and reads the uk commenters on social media. I predict he leaves PBC after this and signs with Hearn and dazn
          You don't have to be "anti-PBC" to say the same things Breazeale says about Wilder having had "40 bogus-ass fights" with a single, meaningful win against a 40 year old nobody like Ortiz.

          Facts are facts. If you're an adult you can draw your own conclusions without watching any of these anti channels. It''s nonsense.

          Comment


          • #55
            Originally posted by vitali1999 View Post
            This of course is true and struggled with both of them. Ortiz nearly knocked him out and the Judges robbed Fury
            To me, this attitude towards good fights is what perverts the degradation of boxing. This is why fighters protect their records because getting in a close fight and losing, regardless of how hard you fight is somehow seen as a black mark.

            Comment


            • #56
              Originally posted by Ake-Dawg View Post
              To me all it does is help build Wilder's profile with folks that wanna see him lose. They still pay too!
              They want to see him lose so much, they never bought tickets for Wilder's fight. But he's growing in profile... Haha.

              Give me hard evidence and prove your nonsense isn't the biggest load of shlt that the usual Wilder zombies come out with? Where is he growing?

              Comment


              • #57
                Originally posted by Ake-Dawg View Post
                This is what angers the anti-PBC and some of the UK contingent. The other Wilder detractors simply want to degrade him such that they create a universe where Joshua is a boxing demigod without having to risk getting knocked out by Wilder.
                Yeah, it's AJ and his fans that don't want this fight. Haha.

                You people need putting down. There is not a single use for you.

                Comment


                • #58
                  Originally posted by Ake-Dawg View Post
                  PBC has brought us some of the best fights over the last three years. I don't understand why people want it to faill or why it receives so much negative comment.
                  I can't speak for everyone and don't want to see them or any boxing promotion fail, but my frustration is that they appear to be the common roadblock to the fights I most want to see and believe would best promote the sport.
                  Mikey v Loma has been ruined, Spence v Crawford is getting the MayPac treatment and Joshua v Wilder is going the same way. I don't understand fans who actively support this in all honesty.
                  Pointing at Top Rank and saying "what about them" is all well and good but we can't criticize them and support PBC doing the exact same thing.

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    Originally posted by Oldskoolg View Post
                    Ali had white America who wanted to see him lose badly. Mayweather had white America and Mexican Americans who wanted him to lose badly. Wilder seems to have the uk who want him to lose badly....what makes wilder’s situation different from the other two is that the only way it effects wilder is through likes, dislikes, and web traffic to his accounts on social media...which in this era does oddly have an effect on his popularity
                    It has nothing to do with race here you crazed weirdo. AJ is black if you haven't noticed.

                    Show mw where Wilder's popularity has grown? Don't just give me your usual mad and crazy talk. I want something solid.

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      Originally posted by Ake-Dawg View Post
                      PBC has brought us some of the best fights over the last three years. I don't understand why people want it to faill or why it receives so much negative comment.
                      They have brought us some good fights. I won't dispute that. But mostly, they bring us their top guys against complete jokes. They want to continue it and turn people away. They don't have the intellect to build PBC and let nature take it's cause. Sorry, but it's not enough. Eddie wants the best fighting the best. Even prospects fight each other on his watch. That's what is needed. Not Al and his continuing band of mismatches nobody even wants.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP