He is going to use every conceivable dirty and roughhousing tactic there is in order to frustrate Tyson Fury by throwing him off his game.[/QUOTE] Have you ever seen Fury V Cunningham? If Whyte fight dirty Fury will maul him like he did Steve.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Tyson Fury To WBC: I'll Fight Whyte - But Only For Diamond Title!
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF View Postif the wbc approves it, it's also good for whyte as whyte could probably get at least 60/40 as diamond champion. maybe even 55-45. as interim champion, whyte likely would have gotten 65/35 or maybe even only 70/30.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by kafkod View PostThe Helenius fight is one of the reasons why I think Fury is all wrong for Whyte. Dillian really struggled in that one because Helenius, who is 6' 6", used his height as a defence by leaning back, away from Whyte's power shots, and Dillian just couldn't land anything meaningful on him throughout the whole 12 rounds.
Fury is even taller and longer than Helenius, and a much, much better boxer. He would use footwork as well as height and Whyte would be eating jabs like there was no tomorrow!
Might've been a different fight if he was fit.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by 1hourRun View PostTyson doesn't really need a belt to leverage a better deal than he already got -- I'm pretty sure Diamond belts don't include PPV revenue, only a percentage on the purse, but I could be wrong.
Comment
-
Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF View PostBecause the WBC has wide discretion in these matters. Fury is a much bigger star than Whyte.
Whyte is a bigger PPV star than Fury.
It's insane to believe that Whyte after beating Browne, Parker, Chisora, Rivas and Fury only deserves 50% but Fury beating Seferi, Pianeta, Deyonce (draw), Schwarz and Whyte deserves 50%.
Comment
Comment