Originally posted by The Big Dunn
View Post
Well people want to know how you conclude floyds cw win over nelo is better than pac s best wins.? What is your criteria for ne o being such a good win?
Nel o wasn't prime! He was drained! He wasn't a p fp fighter in most eyes also! What adversity did he overcome?. On contrary he tried getting things in favour. And we know what happens when you try getting advantages don't we? It takes away from win. So exactly why is it a great win? Floyd beats weakest versions and his fans blow the wins up to epic proportions. Nelo would have been an ok win under normal circumstances. But nelo was far from prime. It was a CW and nelo had no real good wins of note.mSo whynhavevyou elevated the win for Floyd so much? PACs win over cotto was better
Explain yourself and stop being Parrott like. I know your embarrassed citeing the win as Floyd s best win and that's why you won't mention the obvious shortcomings of that win.
Comment