Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Canelo Alvarez is an Excellent Fighter... But Not The Best

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Whats the point of this this writer? Is he implying he will not vote Canelo for the FOTD award?

    Comment


    • #12
      Canelo vs. Khan - Spectacular K.O.

      Lomachenko vs. Rigondeaux - Not a single hard punch landed by either man. Rigondeaux just quit because his reflexes weren’t up to par with Lomachenko’s to win a chess match.

      Canelo did what you’re supposed to do when fighting someone moving up two divisions.

      Lomachenko lost to Orlando Salido.

      Canelo lost to one of the best fighters ever.

      Lomachenko is 31 years old.

      Canelo is 28 years old.

      Comment


      • #13
        Not surprised at all by this horrible biased writer but I bet if Canelo name was more along the lines of say Justin McElevy or some ***** like that he would have praised him as a god.

        The funny thing is he has some overhyped guy with a lesser resume than Canelo as number one tells you pretty much everything you need to know.

        Comment


        • #14
          Most of you guys shouldn’t feel offended by this article. He did acknowledge Canelo as being an excellent fighter. Even in top 3 mixed with Crawford and Loma is ok. These three still have miles to go, the count down is on all of them.

          Comment


          • #15
            Too many gift decisions taints his legacy.

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by Nehnenqui View Post
              Canelo vs. Khan - Spectacular K.O.

              Lomachenko vs. Rigondeaux - Not a single hard punch landed by either man. Rigondeaux just quit because his reflexes weren’t up to par with Lomachenko’s to win a chess match.

              Canelo did what you’re supposed to do when fighting someone moving up two divisions.

              Lomachenko lost to Orlando Salido.

              Canelo lost to one of the best fighters ever.

              Lomachenko is 31 years old.

              Canelo is 28 years old.
              The funny part is these fat balding pedophile looking writers are trying to tell you who’s the “best” boxer yet they have never thrown a single punch in their lives.

              I value experts opinions like the actual fighters.

              These fake biased writers like Rosenthal are biased clowns nothing else.

              Comment


              • #17
                This has to be the dumbest article I've ever read. Canelo is the best, P4P period!

                Comment


                • #18
                  Not a Rosenthal fan but he makes an intelligent argument. Canelo clearly isn't above Loma or Crawford in terms of talent so you have to go to resume. Well... it's got a ton of asteriks.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Found the Top Rank shill

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      P4P is for fighters who are a level above their opposition. It's also not so much about the body of work, but about the latest fight. Canelo has had too many close decisions lately...

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP