Whats the point of this this writer? Is he implying he will not vote Canelo for the FOTD award?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Canelo Alvarez is an Excellent Fighter... But Not The Best
Collapse
-
Canelo vs. Khan - Spectacular K.O.
Lomachenko vs. Rigondeaux - Not a single hard punch landed by either man. Rigondeaux just quit because his reflexes weren’t up to par with Lomachenko’s to win a chess match.
Canelo did what you’re supposed to do when fighting someone moving up two divisions.
Lomachenko lost to Orlando Salido.
Canelo lost to one of the best fighters ever.
Lomachenko is 31 years old.
Canelo is 28 years old.
Comment
-
Not surprised at all by this horrible biased writer but I bet if Canelo name was more along the lines of say Justin McElevy or some ***** like that he would have praised him as a god.
The funny thing is he has some overhyped guy with a lesser resume than Canelo as number one tells you pretty much everything you need to know.
Comment
-
Most of you guys shouldn’t feel offended by this article. He did acknowledge Canelo as being an excellent fighter. Even in top 3 mixed with Crawford and Loma is ok. These three still have miles to go, the count down is on all of them.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Nehnenqui View PostCanelo vs. Khan - Spectacular K.O.
Lomachenko vs. Rigondeaux - Not a single hard punch landed by either man. Rigondeaux just quit because his reflexes weren’t up to par with Lomachenko’s to win a chess match.
Canelo did what you’re supposed to do when fighting someone moving up two divisions.
Lomachenko lost to Orlando Salido.
Canelo lost to one of the best fighters ever.
Lomachenko is 31 years old.
Canelo is 28 years old.
I value experts opinions like the actual fighters.
These fake biased writers like Rosenthal are biased clowns nothing else.
Comment
-
-
Comment