Comments Thread For: Deontay Wilder Explains Importance of Keeping Title in America

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MastaBlasta
    Undisputed Champion
    • Jul 2017
    • 1851
    • 236
    • 328
    • 36,075

    #161
    [QUOTE=Laligalaliga;19741163][QUOTE=MastaBlasta;19741157]
    Originally Posted by MastaBlasta View Post
    That wasn't the problem with THAT offer. Controlling his next 3 fights WAS. So no deal. Tell your boss to remove that part and offer the 120 MIll to BOTH PARTICIPANTS, and he will have a fight.

    how big AJ's name can project your earnings from 1.5mil to potential 40mil but this brother dnt want that work.

    After 40 fights, no live dog on your resume. It's either a psychiatrist patient or a HBP patient. It doesn't tell good of a paper champ.
    AJ's "names" are all on the backend of their careers ... decent but not surprising. Klits who hadn't fought in 2 or 3 years after a devastating loss, Povetkin is winding down, really aj's best win is Whyte. Parker (no dog in him), Takam (gatekeeper), ... those guys are maybe a notch above the average guys Wilder has fought.

    Wilder's foes look worse because he destroyed them all pretty much. And they are usually a lot worse after the fight. AJ hasn't fought an elite guy in their prime other than Whyte (jury not complete on WHyte yet).

    All that "after 40 fight noise" is nonsense. Through history no 2 fighters paths are the same. If you get to be champ and defend nine times you are in elite company regardless. The book isn't complete on Wilder, AJ, or Fury ... maybe by the end your noise today will look ******, be careful.

    Comment

    • Laligalaliga
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Mar 2018
      • 6439
      • 71
      • 11
      • 90,109

      #162
      [QUOTE=MastaBlasta;19741220][QUOTE=Laligalaliga;19741163]
      Originally posted by MastaBlasta

      AJ's "names" are all on the backend of their careers ... decent but not surprising. Klits who hadn't fought in 2 or 3 years after a devastating loss, Povetkin is winding down, really aj's best win is Whyte. Parker (no dog in him), Takam (gatekeeper), ... those guys are maybe a notch above the average guys Wilder has fought.

      Wilder's foes look worse because he destroyed them all pretty much. And they are usually a lot worse after the fight. AJ hasn't fought an elite guy in their prime other than Whyte (jury not complete on WHyte yet).

      All that "after 40 fight noise" is nonsense. Through history no 2 fighters paths are the same. If you get to be champ and defend nine times you are in elite company regardless. The book isn't complete on Wilder, AJ, or Fury ... maybe by the end your noise today will look ******, be careful.
      Lolx.... How funny it sounds. These are the same guys wilder ran away from like a plague even with belt(s) on the line. He didn't want to risk the green belt sooner it can remain in America.
      Wilder has told us all that (his fears and worries) and we understand that it took almost 10yrs to have another American HW.

      He's trying as much as he can to keep as long as he can in America.

      Comment

      • Mr.365
        Undisputed Champion
        • Oct 2018
        • 1233
        • 77
        • 153
        • 36,030

        #163
        Holding on to that belt for dear life

        Comment

        • Cauliflower ear
          Contender
          Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
          • Jul 2018
          • 126
          • 7
          • 0
          • 9,782

          #164
          Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF
          Like every major PPV in history, it was the US broadcaster putting up the guarantees, in this case, Showtime.

          BT wasn't going to be involved in the fight. The contract listed Sky Sports as the UK PPV provider.

          The BT excuse was made up by Hearn months after he passed on the fight because telling the truth wasn't going over well with Joshua's fans. So Hearn switched to lying and it worked like a charm.
          Why on earth would SKY pay for UK exclusivity yet allow themselves to be dictated to by its competitor's?, kind of defeats the object...If i was Barney somebody would be receiving thier P45 if they agreed to the same deal as BT.

          I would also like to mention that in a previous response(thank you) to a post of mine you said that 'Wilder hasn't priced himself out' and that he wants 'the pot to be fully maximized'...I find that contradictory, in essence team Wilder want more money...ie pricing themselves out.

          Comment

          • bigjavi973
            Undisputed Champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Oct 2013
            • 24007
            • 759
            • 1,480
            • 1,236,071

            #165
            Originally posted by lfc19titles
            There was no multi fight deal with Hearn

            It was 2 fights with Joshua for 100m on dazn

            Or 3 fights for 120m paying 20m for Breazeale which is way more than social media



            you just cant make this shit up

            Comment

            • lfc19titles
              Undisputed Champion
              • Mar 2010
              • 8731
              • 725
              • 628
              • 94,838

              #166
              Originally posted by bigjavi973



              you just cant make this shit up
              You clearly struggle to read

              Not a surprise

              It was with dazn not Hearn which is what I said

              A two fight deal with Joshua on dazn who offered it which is what wilder wanted at the start of all of that

              Or three fights as he was ALREADY fighting Breazeale so it included him

              I would also like to make you aware, it was agreed from both at the get go when it all started that it would be two fights, both teams wanted this

              Team wilder simply ducked Joshua, they said they are loyal to showtime hence rejecting it

              Once again, team wilder wanted two fights from the start and it’s known to everyone

              A Joshua fight and a rematch with him win or lose

              Wilder straight up ducked and most of the boxing world knows it, just you wilder fan boys trying to re write history and making fake road blocks

              Wilder would never accept a one off fight nor would joshua, it will always have a rematch clause

              Have you just started watching boxing

              Comment

              • bigjavi973
                Undisputed Champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Oct 2013
                • 24007
                • 759
                • 1,480
                • 1,236,071

                #167
                Originally posted by lfc19titles
                You clearly struggle to read

                Not a surprise

                It was with dazn not Hearn which is what I said

                A two fight deal with Joshua on dazn who offered it which is what wilder wanted at the start of all of that

                Or three fights as he was ALREADY fighting Breazeale so it included him

                I would also like to make you aware, it was agreed from both at the get go when it all started that it would be two fights, both teams wanted this

                Team wilder simply ducked Joshua, they said they are loyal to showtime hence rejecting it

                Once again, team wilder wanted two fights from the start and it’s known to everyone

                A Joshua fight and a rematch with him win or lose

                Wilder straight up ducked and most of the boxing world knows it, just you wilder fan boys trying to re write history and making fake road blocks

                Wilder would never accept a one off fight nor would joshua, it will always have a rematch clause

                Have you just started watching boxing
                again

                he doesnt wanna bother with hearn....

                dazn are promoters now?

                who is gonna promote the fight if its on dazn? I would be surprised if they even let lou dibella promote there (dibella has been wilder's promoter for a while now)


                also.... why does the fight have to be exclusively to dazn? Why would showtime build up wilder with all those fights just to have his biggest fight not on showtime?


                its just common sense

                Comment

                • lfc19titles
                  Undisputed Champion
                  • Mar 2010
                  • 8731
                  • 725
                  • 628
                  • 94,838

                  #168
                  Originally posted by bigjavi973
                  again

                  he doesnt wanna bother with hearn....

                  dazn are promoters now?

                  who is gonna promote the fight if its on dazn? I would be surprised if they even let lou dibella promote there (dibella has been wilder's promoter for a while now)


                  also.... why does the fight have to be exclusively to dazn? Why would showtime build up wilder with all those fights just to have his biggest fight not on showtime?


                  its just common sense
                  You are changing the subject now

                  First it was he has to sign with Hearn which isn’t the case

                  Now it’s showtime built him up, it has to be on dazn as they are giving the most money

                  Man...really are clutching at straws

                  Either way team wilder admitted they don’t want Joshua in 2019 even if they get 50-50. They never wanted him

                  One day wilder will cash out and take his loss

                  Comment

                  • bigjavi973
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Oct 2013
                    • 24007
                    • 759
                    • 1,480
                    • 1,236,071

                    #169
                    Originally posted by lfc19titles
                    You are changing the subject now

                    First it was he has to sign with Hearn which isn’t the case

                    Now it’s showtime built him up, it has to be on dazn as they are giving the most money

                    Man...really are clutching at straws

                    Either way team wilder admitted they don’t want Joshua in 2019 even if they get 50-50. They never wanted him

                    One day wilder will cash out and take his loss
                    no im not....

                    he doesnt want to deal with hearn or dazn....

                    ive been saying this since he didnt take the deal imo that made the most sense

                    Comment

                    • lfc19titles
                      Undisputed Champion
                      • Mar 2010
                      • 8731
                      • 725
                      • 628
                      • 94,838

                      #170
                      Originally posted by bigjavi973
                      no im not....

                      he doesnt want to deal with hearn or dazn....

                      ive been saying this since he didnt take the deal imo that made the most sense
                      It’s an excuse man

                      He’s turned down more money several times to fight for less in a low risk fight compared to joshua or Whyte

                      The dude is shook and wants to keep his belt and has now been damaged after fury

                      He went and Heard dazns offer and knew it was best for him

                      As Shirley said

                      They won’t let him go

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP