Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Spence: Crawford Would Get Broken Brook I Already Finished

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Actually GGG already broke Brook before you got him. Just like when u fought Algieri thst was pac’s Leftovers who he stopped like 6 times. Peterson was Matthysse’s leftovers who he blitzed our way faster than u. And of u get Porter next well u just eating off of Brook’s and Thurman’s leftovers and really off of Ugas leftovers since he got robbed. See how that works son?

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by techliam View Post
      This guy is so hard to like

      He seems to have the skill, but his personality and approach is seriously off putting.

      This seems to me an attempted deflection at his own fight with Brook, which was dead even before Brook’s face fell apart (again). A couple of posters have mentioned a head butt, but i’d Need to rewatch to verify that. But, Brook has just been battered by Golovkin, at 160, and had surgery to correct his face. How is that not broken?
      Dead even? After four rounds that were not dominated by either fighter, Spence took over. I recall Carl Froch continuously stating that he felt Brook won the first either 3 or 4 but that Spence had swept every round since. Even still, Spence says he "finished" Brook. He acknowledged that GGG broke him first, then he broke him again and "finished" him.

      To me, Brook wasn't broken (in spirit) by GGG and that he came out with fire against Spence. However, when he couldn't impose his size and will on Spence, he wilted a bit. Since that fight, even though he hasn't had to drain to 147, he hasn't fought as spirited as he did in the beginning of the Spence fight. One could argue that as evidence that Brook was "finished" after the Spence fight. I think he just can't get up for a fight that isn't for a belt or against a rival like Khan.

      Comment


      • #43
        Crawford wants the best, the best make excuses. That's just an irrefutable fact. Spence, Thurman and Danny make excuses to avoid Bud Crawford...it's all over the internet, it's everywhere.

        Real question is why would anyone defend that dishonest behavior?

        Originally posted by SchoolTheseCats View Post
        If porter/Thurman/pac C level competition what is the likes of brook and khan... I mean it’s ok to be upset fight not happening next but at least make sense when trying downgrade fights when Crawford going fight pure grade A horse$h1t in the meantime

        Comment


        • #44
          Spence should just say, why fight Crawford when I can fight easy guys. Oh, I forget, he did say that...on film.

          My bad.

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by Slowhand View Post
            Good for him. Riddle me this: "Don't talk about it be about it. We need that fight." Whose words? The point is, why should we care about the networks, promoters, all the disgusting corrupt business side of the noble sport? Fighters fight, fans watch and enjoy, the rest should just stay in the back and keep their mouths shut.
            A great man's words. But you're talking in ideals. I had this discussion with someone else, if fans are willing to throw a guy away after a loss, then they deserve what they want immediately. Also, you're talking like the Porter is a bad fight. he not giving us garbage out here, but Bob and Crawford definitely are.

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by Bjl12 View Post
              He "whitewashed" a PFP guy 2 weight classes below him. And for someone who calls himself "Man Down" he couldnt even KO/TKO/KD or seriously hurt...a LIGHTWEIGHT.

              I guess youd be okay if Crawford said he was "licking his chops" for Lomachenko?

              You fucking cuck
              Another nerd with the unnecessary insults. It shows that you're either immature or your life lacks the things that makes life worthwhile. Keep it pushing clown

              Comment


              • #47
                Try 1 more time. Spence can make say $7 for Porter, $7 for Thurman, $10 Manny then unify $20 Crawford. $44 total. Crawford can do $5 Brook that’s it. Why would Spence bypass $24 fight Crawford now maybe lose out on $24. Business wise it’s the move

                Comment


                • #48
                  Somebody should tell Spence how ironic that statement was lmao.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    People are turning on Spence because he's dishonest and they instinctively know he's lying.

                    I don't think Spence is a natural liar and that's why he drinks to cope with the patent dishonesty. They're ruining Spence, he's ducking Crawford and he knows it and still he's all in 100%. Spence deserves 0 sympathy.

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      I see, it's fantasy fights holding it up. Yesterday it was the promoter today it's fantasy fights that Spence couldn't get in 4 years but magically he'll get all 4 in 2019.

                      Hello, is anyone there????????? Are you paying attention or just responding with a per-planed agenda?


                      Originally posted by bronx7 View Post
                      Try 1 more time. Spence can make say $7 for Porter, $7 for Thurman, $10 Manny then unify $20 Crawford. $44 total. Crawford can do $5 Brook that’s it. Why would Spence bypass $24 fight Crawford now maybe lose out on $24. Business wise it’s the move

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP