Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Fielding vs Rolls -who wins??

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Rocky, easily. A 35 year old prospect?

    LOOOL!!

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by icha View Post
      it seems like a logic choice here, but i have seen some posters claiming the opposite...
      You can probably find 97k people who will choose rolls.

      Comment


      • #13
        The more experienced bum beats the bum GGG is fighting next.

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by Boksfan View Post
          Rolls is undefeated so he beats Fielding.
          he does.

          until they fight of ourse.




          on the poll i say rocky outpoints rollo

          Comment


          • #15
            Only 1 of these guys has been a world class fighter. And the other is Rolls. Barely ranked top 100 and has never fought a top 80 ranked opponent and he's not some spring chicken. He's been a pro for a phuking decade and is 35 years old yet he is still a prospect level fighter LMAO

            Comment


            • #16
              Come on GGG fan girls explain to us all how Rolls is a better fighter then Fielding???? despite the fact that you have never seen him fight and never heard of him prior to GGG pulling his name out of the trash bin.

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by bigdunny1 View Post
                Come on GGG fan girls explain to us all how Rolls is a better fighter then Fielding???? despite the fact that you have never seen him fight and never heard of him prior to GGG pulling his name out of the trash bin.
                you aint getting an answer from them, but the poll speaks for it self...

                Comment


                • #18
                  I'll give you an answer. I've never even seen Rolls, and think its a disgraceful mismatch. I also know Fielding isnt world class because i have eyes that work, and had he not been a good ticket seller he could well be 35 years old and unknown. Zeuge had beaten no one, and if you think Ryder is world class, you might be legally blind, just watch the Blackwell fight. So while Rocky has better accomplishments it doesn't change he was an easy mismatch for Canelo, and he couldn't win. Same as this fight. Who knows what Rolls couldve done if he was a friendly scouser with a good promoter? Who cares. Canelo fought a no hoper, just like Golovkin. They both fought Welters. One fought Ishida and one fought Kirkland. One fought Jacobs and now the other is. Both talk about lightheavyweight when we know it wont happen. Neither fought Charlo or Saunders and neither ever will. And both are getting rich doing it, while most of you cant afford a blow up doll to entertain you..��

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by icha View Post
                    it seems like a logic choice here, but i have seen some posters claiming the opposite...
                    So do rated bigger fighters always beat underdogs with no big wins on there record? Do nobody's not beat higher rated guys? Boxing history says it happens plenty.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by lopetego View Post
                      better question..who the **** is Steve Rolls?
                      lol exactly...how is anyone supposed to evaluate how good he is when nobody has heard of him or seen him fight. if I was gonna watch this joke of a fight, I'd hope he would put up a better fight than fielding...that was shameful.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP