Comments Thread For: Jacobs: Canelo Will Have Another Loss Before 3rd Golovkin Fight

[kushking]

You forgot the 114-114 scorecard by CJ Ross against Floyd. Kush does that to you. You tend to forget things.

You mean like the castillo scorecards for floyd,or the scorecard or 2 of virtually every fighter in history that you seem to have forgotten. Name me a single fighter who didn't get 1 scorecard they didn't at all deserve.

your also forgetting that he was down on cards vs khan which is bs. Far cry from this armed robber you 3g fans make him to be don't you think? That was in vegas if I remember correctly too

[Insanityisbliss]

Let’s say he does soundly beat Canelo and gets the ko or decision. The guy will probably cherrypick like a mofo. The demands will be even more difficult in the GGG rematch negotiations because now he hasn’t more leverage. The list goes on. Anyways, I doubt he’ll knock out Canelo. Maybe he’ll hurt him, but somehow Canelo “wolverine healing factor” will kick right back in like it did in the GGG rematch.

[Jrtxboiy]

Please ggg beat him the first fight

[gbonafide]

You mean like the castillo scorecards for floyd,or the scorecard or 2 of virtually every fighter in history that you seem to have forgotten. Name me a single fighter who didn't get 1 scorecard they didn't at all deserve.

your also forgetting that he was down on cards vs khan which is bs. Far cry from this armed robber you 3g fans make him to be don't you think? That was in vegas if I remember correctly too

Man you really sound like a Floyd fanboy who has jumped on the Canelo bandwagon. I like GGG and Canelo and the fact of the matter is GGG edged him in the first fight but had to settle for a draw cuz of shady scorecards, not 1 but 2 in the same fight. Has Don Trella ever explained how he could give Canelo round 7 cuz it’s not plausible. I have no problems with Canelo winning the 2nd fight but can also see why people think GGG won, it was a very close fight. You just seem to have an anti-GGG agenda and are not being objective.

[kushking]

Man you really sound like a Floyd fanboy who has jumped on the Canelo bandwagon. I like GGG and Canelo and the fact of the matter is GGG edged him in the first fight but had to settle for a draw cuz of shady scorecards, not 1 but 2 in the same fight. Has Don Trella ever explained how he could give Canelo round 7 cuz it’s not plausible. I have no problems with Canelo winning the 2nd fight but can also see why people think GGG won, it was a very close fight. You just seem to have an anti-GGG agenda and are not being objective.

So according to your OPINION that ggg won a very close fight your claiming its all a conspiracy & i'm a fanboi 4 disagreeing with said conspiracy even though trella & every other judge has given ggg like every rd in prior fights


Your saying you think ggg just"edged it "but are still crying robbery. And i'm the fanboi? I think Canelo at least deserved a draw 1st fight (worst case scenario)
even though I had him 7-4 & 1 even rd,he controlled ggg w great defense in that fight despite giving him several rds off sheer activity. Ggg didn't land but 7 body shots the 1st fight to canelos 50,& he didn't land any combos or most his arsenal.

Canelo might've won 1st fight more convincingly even because ggg didn't do anything to him but headhunt. But at same time 2nd fight he won clearly because he fcked gggs face up way worse & was more aggressive but ate some shots because of it also.

Canelo landed flashy combos at will all fight and nasty body shots all day long. Try to rewatch without sound & be objective about which fighter landed all the clean powerful shots/combos/ & esp. bodyshots that score tons of pts in judges eyes especially trella whom loves bodywork from ggg in the past.

[icha]

something tells me canelo is going to shine in this fight... no disrespect for jacobs, he is a great fighter and person, but canelo is reaching his highest levels , he is just on fire and it will show his best in this fight...

[Lemonhead_Jeff]

C’mon Jeff, we all know Jacobs isn’t winning a decision against Canelo in Vegas. He’d have to knock him down like 4 times and even that would be dubious. He’s down 3 rounds already.

I'm not quite a cynical as most, but hopefully Jacobs will
bring the fight to Canelo if he shares your pessimistic point
of view about the potential for skullduggery. Historically,
we know that most judges usually seem to favor the
aggressor, so Jacobs should keep that in mind if he does
decide to employ a defensive approach. Jacobs does not
concede to his loss to Golovkin, and he will be even more
incredulous towards a potential loss to Canelo. There was
not necessarily any corruption involved in his close loss to
GGG, and there wont necessarily be corruption involved
if he loses a similarly close decision to Canelo.

[gbonafide]

So according to your OPINION that ggg won a very close fight your claiming its all a conspiracy & i'm a fanboi 4 disagreeing with said conspiracy even though trella & every other judge has given ggg like every rd in prior fights


Your saying you think ggg just"edged it "but are still crying robbery. And i'm the fanboi? I think Canelo at least deserved a draw 1st fight (worst case scenario)
even though I had him 7-4 & 1 even rd,he controlled ggg w great defense in that fight despite giving him several rds off sheer activity. Ggg didn't land but 7 body shots the 1st fight to canelos 50,& he didn't land any combos or most his arsenal.

Canelo might've won 1st fight more convincingly even because ggg didn't do anything to him but headhunt. But at same time 2nd fight he won clearly because he fcked gggs face up way worse & was more aggressive but ate some shots because of it also.

Canelo landed flashy combos at will all fight and nasty body shots all day long. Try to rewatch without sound & be objective about which fighter landed all the clean powerful shots/combos/ & esp. bodyshots that score tons of pts in judges eyes especially trella whom loves bodywork from ggg in the past.

You’re a hater, it’s clear. I had GGG winning 7-5 in the first fight. When I watched with the sound down months later I had it 8-4. The manner of the draw & the scorecards was what we were taking about. Favorable treatment in vegas for Canelo. You are without a doubt in the minority thinking Canelo won the first fight. You’re also in the minority thinking he doesn’t have an edge with the judges fighting in Vegas. That’s why ur a fanboy. Endy story.

[gbonafide]

I'm not quite a cynical as most, but hopefully Jacobs will
bring the fight to Canelo if he shares your pessimistic point
of view about the potential for skullduggery. Historically,
we know that most judges usually seem to favor the
aggressor, so Jacobs should keep that in mind if he does
decide to employ a defensive approach. Jacobs does not
concede to his loss to Golovkin, and he will be even more
incredulous towards a potential loss to Canelo. There was
not necessarily any corruption involved in his close loss to
GGG, and there wont necessarily be corruption involved
if he loses a similarly close decision to Canelo.

You’re absolutely right.

[Lemonhead_Jeff]

You’re absolutely right.

I genuinely like both fighters, and I'm really looking forward
to this one! This one has the potential to be a great fight,
if the shorter and stubbier, Canelo, doesn't have to chase
Jacobs too much. Jacobs could box 'n move all night,
completely frustrating Canelo, but if the judges perceive
him to be running then he's taking his chances on the
cards. Some people think Jacobs size will be a big factor,
but it's only his height and length that will be a factor. He
won't out-muscle Canelo. People thought GGG would be too
strong for Canelo, but that was not the case, and Canelo
seems to get physically stronger with each recent fight.
Canelo is also good and comfortable on the inside, so
Danny might be persuaded early to box from a distance and
use his legs. I think Jacobs will end up moving a lot, and
losing a close decision. People will call it controversial
either way. I just hope it's exciting!