Comments Thread For: Gennady Golovkin vs. Steve Rolls Finalized For June 8, MSG
Collapse
-
-
It's more like Golovkin already fought Javobs and beat him. Canelo then cherry picked no hope Fielding and admittedly Golovkin is cherry picking Rolls. Glad you brought up Rosado because thinking back on how long he lasted against Golovkin I think he would be a lock to beat Fielding. As a matter of fact Khan lasted longer against Canelo than Fielding and so did Smith. Jesus Fielding was horrible.
yea, but he is not worse than the guy who YOU never heard of an hour ago..... but insist can beat Fielding now
I bet you never even bothered to youtube a Rolls fight before you insisted that he could beat Fielding
you are full-of-itComment
-
You're the same ****** who said Loma has been fighting cans since Russell lol. Be a tribal little fanboy if you want but that's all you are.
This is a sh.it fight but with Canelo next it's not really a huge deal. GGG has the highest amount of good wins in this decade but keep on hating ****** boy.
You should have your posting privileges revoked for saying Loma has only been fighting cans since Russell. If you take an IQ test and it scores about 80 I will delete my account ******.
what the fk is wrong with you ?Comment
-
Actually, the bold is the other way around. No one is arguing that there's a possible 3rd fight with Canelo on the horizon. But why such a weak opponent? If you were being honest you would atleast acknowledge this is probably the absolute worst opponent he could've picked.
Since you said you've seen my posts you know I'm on record saying Golovkin should've won the decision in first fight with Canelo.
Which tribe was I apart of then?
Check my posts - I have always said this is a sh.it fight as the Adams fight would have been a sh.it fight. I would probably prefer a light touch versus inactivity for GGG at his age but that is his call anyway. If he wants to stay busy before Canelo or Jacobs/Andrade then so be it. I would prefer he got in there against a guy who I thought could give him some rounds but no one else is really available.
Well saying GGG should have won fight 1 was pretty obvious. Saying he should have won fight 2 was pretty obvious as well actually, but because Canelo did better there some want to give him a win yet I never hear which 7 rounds people give him there.
And you know your tribe is not GGG or Canelo. You know who your tribe is and you know what tribes GGG haters fall into. Canelo fans or Floyd/Wilder/Ward fans. Let's not be silly.Comment
-
Like I said man you're a literal ****** if you don't realize why this fight is happening and what fight is next. But again you show that you're a ****** in almost all of your posts so what else is new. You're probably fatter and uglier in real life that your sig pic lolComment
-
Actually, the bold is the other way around. No one is arguing that there's a possible 3rd fight with Canelo on the horizon. But why such a weak opponent? If you were being honest you would atleast acknowledge this is probably the absolute worst opponent he could've picked.
Since you said you've seen my posts you know I'm on record saying Golovkin should've won the decision in first fight with Canelo.
Which tribe was I apart of then?
He used to be boxing1012,
Is now boxing 1013,
and by the end of the year once his alt gets cooked a thousand times over, he’ll be Boxing2019Comment
-
Why would I do that? I know logic isn't your strong suit but I just challenged you to take an IQ test and post it on here and you deflected into asking me if I was going to the fight when I am on record saying it was a sh.it fight.
You might be more ******ed than I thought, it's almost impressive.Comment
-
Comment
-
Why would I do that? I know logic isn't your strong suit but I just challenged you to take an IQ test and post it on here and you deflected into asking me if I was going to the fight when I am on record saying it was a sh.it fight.
You might be more ******ed than I thought, it's almost impressive.
Your estrogen levels are through the roofLast edited by Curtis Harper; 04-16-2019, 07:26 PM.Comment
Comment