So, which has better fighters representing there belts WBC, WBA, IBF, or WBO.

[VanesBoxing]

Mostly WBO.....suckiest belt but has the better fighters.

ya, aesthetically speaking (the looks of the belts)

these are my choices:

1) WBC (green)
2) IBF (Red)
3) WBO (purple-ish)
4) WBA (black)

[Tha Greatest]

Can you guys please act like these belts don't exist?

[VanesBoxing]

Can you guys please act like these belts don't exist?

but they do man, and it adds a little ****e and flavor to boxing.

How plain do fighters look when they walk in the ring empty handed, compared to Mayweather coming in with like 5 guys behind him holding his belts up high. Its great for show purposes man, and of course its hard earned hardware for the fighters.

Did you know when you win a belt, you get 2 of them, one to keep forever, and another to carry in the ring with you and possibly lose it to your opponent.

Well im not sure if all the belts are like this, but i know a few are.

[Tha Greatest]

but they do man, and it adds a little ****e and flavor to boxing.

How plain do fighters look when they walk in the ring empty handed, compared to Mayweather coming in with like 5 guys behind him holding his belts up high. Its great for show purposes man, and of course its hard earned hardware for the fighters.

Did you know when you win a belt, you get 2 of them, one to keep forever, and another to carry in the ring with you and possibly lose it to your opponent.

Well im not sure if all the belts are like this, but i know a few are.

Bro, I know what you mean. It does look nice to have a bunch of belts when you're walking in the ring

but....

There's WAY too many belts out there. There should be one belt IMO. There should be one champion, it just doesn't make sence to have a bunch of champions. It was way better in the olden days when there was just one champion.

[VanesBoxing]

Bro, I know what you mean. It does look nice to have a bunch of belts when you're walking in the ring

but....

There's WAY too many belts out there. There should be one belt IMO. There should be one champion, it just doesn't make sence to have a bunch of champions. It was way better in the olden days when there was just one champion.

oh that i definitely agree with man, no doubt.

But to get rid of belts all together would be foolish.

Ya, I always wanted just one world title in each division too, so that at any given time, you could only have 17 active World Champions.

Id say keep the WBC belt, since it has the most history and looks the best, and dump the rest.

[Tha Greatest]

oh that i definitely agree with man, no doubt.

But to get rid of belts all together would be foolish.

Ya, I always wanted just one world title in each division too, so that at any given time, you could only have 17 active World Champions.

Id say keep the WBC belt, since it has the most history and looks the best, and dump the rest.

Nice.

I say...
Dump all 4 of them.

Keep the Ring Magazine belt since most of their rankings are acurate too.

WBC is way to messed up today, man.
Keep stripping everyone and have terrible rankings.