Very hard to pick.
Just going by what both have achieved I would have to say Manny but it would definitely be a war.
I think I might have to sit on the fence with this one and say a draw though.
I would say Lomachenko of it comes down to pure skills alone. But Pacquiao by late TKO probably because of the hige gap in power, and each landed punch of Pacquiao would damage Loma.
The only time we saw a Prime Pacquiao at his naturalweight (135) was at 135 where he looked untouchable.
I would say Lomachenko of it comes down to pure skills alone. But Pacquiao by late TKO probably because of the hige gap in power, and each landed punch of Pacquiao would damage Loma.
The only time we saw a Prime Pacquiao at his naturalweight (135) was at 135 where he looked untouchable.
I agree with your second half but come on man...Manny knows everything there is about boxing. I agree Loma is special...but to say Pac doesn't match him in skill must mean you are a blinkered modernist.
I agree with your second half but come on man...Manny knows everything there is about boxing. I agree Loma is special...but to say Pac doesn't match him in skill must mean you are a blinkered modernist.
I didnt say that. I said that if it comes to just pure skills which means if fighters doesnt have to worry about power then I'll give it to Lomachenko. Power is a form of a skill in a fighter and utilising it along a fighters skill is what makes Pacquiao, such a deadly fighter.
And Pacquiao's style darting in and out would be troublesome for Loma because all of Loma's opponent with the exception of Rigo is just sitting infront of with a highguard. And Pacquiaos the last person to do that.
Comment